B Non-parallel double slit experiment

Devin-M
Messages
1,069
Reaction score
765
Is it possible to tell which slit some of the light went through when the slits aren’t parallel (green & red boxes in option 3)?

I used a Bahtinov mask to cover the aperture of my 600mm f/9 lens while observing the star Polaris. Various open slits were tested while others were covered with masking tape. -
All exposures were 5 minutes with a 656nm narrowband filter on a Nikon D800 @ 6400iso. Only option 4 appears to show a double slit interference pattern while options 1, 2 & 3 appear to show a single slit interference pattern.

14-jpg.jpg

02CB6C6D-9F93-42DF-A0C5-F25A48506D66.jpeg


12-jpg.jpg
13-jpg.jpg


69677B3C-86DB-4C0B-B117-8EEEFDB95D26.jpeg

BEB6D57C-6BED-473E-8558-E321416AC426.jpeg

RAW Files: https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=kZcjE2VZR1eBfOCgGAYfuGOv9EMgPH3KIR07

A bit of prior discussion…
Post in thread 'Diffraction Effects and Artifacts in Telescopes like the JWST'
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...telescopes-like-the-jwst.1047305/post-6823238
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Devin-M said:
Is it possible to tell which slit some of the light went through when the slits aren’t parallel
I was going to say what I said in the thread you linked to, that you can't tell which slit the light went through. But after thinking about the problem more, I have to confess that I don't actually know. I'm assuming the more your rotate the slits relative to each other, the less correlation their patterns have, as image #3 appears to show.
 
The point is that if you make it possible to observe, through which slit a photon comes with certainty, you completely loose the interference pattern. On the other hand, if you want an interference pattern with the best contrast you can get you need perfect ignorance of the which-way information. You can of course have everything between these two extremes, i.e., you can have some probabilistic information through which slit the photon came (i.e., with some probability larger than 1/2 a photon came through one of the slits instead of the other) at the cost of lower contrast of the interference pattern and vice versa. This, of course, is a typical wave phenomenon applying to both classical waves as well as single quanta (photons) of the quantized field.
 
  • Like
Likes kered rettop, DrChinese and DrClaude
vanhees71 said:
On the other hand, if you want an interference pattern with the best contrast you can get you need perfect ignorance of the which-way information.

The picture below seems a strange case… on the one hand, for the circled light (vertical spikes) we see a strong interference pattern and don’t know exactly which slit the light went through, on the other hand it seems like we also can deduce with high probability the circled light didn’t go through the diagonal slits…

F596F6FC-1178-4B86-801B-C8018D7CB120.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Back
Top