Non-relativistic limit of Dirac bilinear

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrea M.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Limit
Click For Summary
In the non-relativistic limit, the vector and axial currents of Dirac spinors simplify due to the dominance of the first two components of the spinor, which are large, while the last two components are small. This leads to the approximation where the off-diagonal terms involving the gamma matrices can be neglected, resulting in the forms: $$\bar{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\nu\rightarrow\nu^{\dagger}\nu$$ and $$\bar{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_5\nu\rightarrow\bar{\nu}\vec{\gamma}\gamma_5\nu$$. The behavior of gamma5 is different, as it reverses the roles of the components, making the diagonal terms more relevant for small momenta. References such as Peskin's work provide additional context on how these approximations relate to the Coulomb potential and the behavior of currents at low momentum. Understanding these simplifications is crucial for grasping the physics behind direct detection techniques for dark matter.
Andrea M.
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I'm studying direct detection techniques for dark matter and in almost all the articles I read (e.g.
Gondolo, P. (1996, May 13). Phenomenological Introduction to Direct Dark Matter Detection. arXiv.org.) the authors say that in the non-relativistic limit the vector and axial currents take the following forms: $$\bar{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\nu\rightarrow\nu^{\dagger}\nu$$ $$\bar{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_5\nu\rightarrow\bar{\nu}\vec{\gamma}\gamma_5\nu$$
can anyone explain me why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One fast answer, in the non-relativistic limit, the first two components of the Dirac spinor are large and the last two are small...
That means that when you take the products of the type: ## \bar{\psi} \gamma_\mu \psi## the ##\gamma_i## which are off-diagonal will couple your small component to the large... while the ##\gamma_0## will couple your large to large and small to small. That's why the ##\bar{\psi} \gamma_i \psi## can be neglected versus the ##\bar{\psi} \gamma_0 \psi = \psi^\dagger \psi##.

For the ##\gamma_5## case the thing is the opposite because gamma5 reverses them (the gamma0 becomes off-diagonal in block form, while the gamma_i become diagonal).
 
You can also have a look in Peskin, Ch4.8 Coulomb potential, where he gives \bar{u} \gamma_0 u \approx 2m \xi^\dagger \xi while he also mentions that the other can be neglected for small momenta... The thing is that again the 1st two go with ##m## for ##p \rightarrow 0## while the other two go with ##p##.
 
Thank you so much, I'm having little hard time trying to understand the physics behind the direct detection techniques.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K