Noncommuting operators and uncertainty relations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between noncommuting operators and uncertainty relations in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of operator commutativity for the measurement of observables, particularly focusing on the conditions under which simultaneous eigenstates can be achieved and the nature of uncertainty relations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that simultaneous eigenstates are both a necessary and sufficient condition for two observables to be measured simultaneously and accurately.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of commuting operators, noting that if two operators A and B commute, then they can be measured simultaneously, but seeks clarification on the proof of this assertion.
  • A participant provides a mathematical argument regarding the relationship between eigenstates of B and the ability to diagonalize A in the eigenspace of B, particularly in cases of degeneracy.
  • There is a request for clarification on how the property of Aψ being an eigenstate of B relates to diagonalizing A in the b-eigenspace, indicating some uncertainty in understanding this connection.
  • Another participant responds by elaborating on the linear independence of eigenstates and how this relates to the measurement of observables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the basic principles of operator commutativity and its implications for measurement, but there is ongoing debate and clarification needed regarding the specifics of diagonalization in degenerate cases and the proof of the converse relationship.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved questions about the proof of the converse relationship between commuting observables and simultaneous measurements, particularly in the context of degenerate eigenvalues. Some assumptions about linear independence and the structure of eigenspaces are also implicit but not fully explored.

noospace
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I've been thinking about the connection between commutativity of operators and uncertainty.

I've convinced myself that to have simultaneous eigenstates is a necessary and sufficient condition for two observeables to be measured simultaneously and accurately.

It's also clear that simultaneous eigenstates gives us commutativity. So we have that non-commuting observables have an uncertainty relation between them.

What's not exactly clear to me is why the converse holds, ie commuting observeables can be measured simultaneously and accurately.

Is there simple proof of this that I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noospace said:
What's not exactly clear to me is why the converse holds, ie commuting observeables can be measured simultaneously and accurately.

Let A, B two operators with [A,B]=0. If \psi is an eigenstate of B that is B\psi = b\psi, then BA\psi = AB\psi = b A\psi so \phi = A\psi is also an eigenstate of B corresponding to the eigenvalue b.

If the eigenvalue b is not degenerate then this means that phi must be proportional to psi, that is \phi = A\psi = a\psi and thus psi is a simultaneous eigenvector of A and B.

If the eigenvalue b is is for example twice degenerate, then you may diagonalize A in the eigen space of b, i.e. find eigenstates psi1 and psi2 of b, that fulfill A\psi_1 = a_1\psi_1 and A\psi_2 = a_2\psi_2 and consequently psi1 and psi2 serve as a common system of eigenstates for A and B in the subspace defined by the eigenvalue b.
 
Last edited:
In the degenerate case, I'm not quite understanding what A\psi being an eignestate of B has to do with being able to diagonalize A in the b-eigenspace?

Could someone please help me understand this?
 
Ahh,

If A\psi belongs to the b-eigenspace then we can express it as

A\psi = a_1\psi_1 + a_2\psi_2
A(\psi_1 + \psi_2) = a_1\psi_1 + a_2\psi_2

so A\psi_i = a_1\psi_i by linear independence.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
947
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K