Nonconservative vs conservative force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces in physics. Conservative forces, such as gravitational and spring forces, conserve mechanical energy, meaning the work done is independent of the path taken. In contrast, non-conservative forces, including friction and tension, do not conserve energy, resulting in energy loss that cannot be recovered. The potential energy in a conservative field, exemplified by gravity, is calculated using the formula mgh, where m is mass, g is the gravitational constant, and h is height above ground.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts
  • Knowledge of force types (conservative vs. non-conservative)
  • Basic mathematical skills for energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in physics
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem
  • Explore examples of non-conservative forces in real-world applications
  • Investigate the implications of conservative forces in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental principles of forces and energy conservation.

-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the difference between two of the forces above?? Can someone please give me an example so that it's easier for me to understand

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
A conservative force is a force that conserves mechanical energy, where the work done by that force on an object moving between 2 points is independent of the path taken. That's a pretty unclear definition, so suffice to say that in basic mechanics, gravity forces and spring forces are conservative forces, and every other type force (friction, tension, applied forces, other contact forces, etc.) are non conservative forces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Volcano
Your explanation is basically the same as what my book says.. If I am not mistaken my instructor used to say that we can convert back the energy produced/lost by conservative forces but not in non-conservative forces. Is this right?
 
We say that gravity is a conservative field, because there IS independence of path.
the potential energy of an object is mgh, mass X gravitational constant X height above ground. It does NOT matter how the object got there the result is the same.
As the object moves through this field(gravity in this example) sometimes the force works
AGAINST the object, and sometimes the force helps the object (downhill) but if we move in a closed path, the net result is zero. We did NOT profit, and we did not loose anything,
we BROKE EVEN (in layman's terms)
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
973
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
766
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
744
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
757
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
841