Nonlinear 2nd order ode reduction solutions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reduction of a nonlinear second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE). Participants are exploring the integration of a separable equation derived from the original ODE and questioning the validity of their integration steps.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of integrating a derived expression for p, questioning whether the integration to obtain y is correct. There are attempts to clarify the integration steps and the implications of initial conditions on the constant c.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing guidance on integration techniques and clarifying the relationship between p and y'. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the initial condition and the resulting expressions for y, with no explicit consensus reached on the correctness of the derived solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the impact of initial conditions on the constant c and are discussing the presence of the ± sign in their solutions, indicating potential ambiguities in the integration process.

physicsjock
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
hey guys

i've been trying to work out this ode reduction question,

http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8198/asdawt.jpg

after i use the hint and end up with a seperable equation then integrate to get

\begin{align}<br /> &amp; p=\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{{{y}^{2}}-2c}} \\ <br /> &amp; \text{Then}\,\,\,\text{integrating}\,\,\,\text{again (using}\,\,wolframalpha) \\ <br /> &amp; y=\pm \log \left( \sqrt{{{y}^{2}}-2c}+y \right)+c \\ <br /> &amp; A{{e}^{\pm y}}=\sqrt{{{y}^{2}}-2c}+y \\ <br /> \end{align}

the first line above is consistent with what i get when i use mathematica

but after getting p, is it correct to integrate p to get y? It doesn't look correct in my working but I can't find another way to do it.

i thought about trying to solve the equation as y'= +/- ... instead as a first order ode but it seems too complicated,

Is there something simple I am not seeing?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are told that p= y'= dy/dx so
\frac{dy}{dx}= \pm\frac{1}{\sqrt{y^2- 2c}}
and then
\frac{dy}{\pm\sqrt{y^2- 2c}}= dx

Integrate both sides of that.
 
Hey HallsofIvy

Thanks for replying,

Are you sure its not:
\pm dy \sqrt{y^2- 2c}= dx

since you take the dx to the right side, and the inverted root onto the left?

using the initial condition I get c=0 since

\begin{align}<br /> &amp; y&#039;(0)=\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{{{y}^{2}}(0)-2c}}=\pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2c}}=-1 \\ <br /> &amp; \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2c}}=-1,\,\,\,\pm 1=-\sqrt{1-2c}\,\,squaring\,\,both\,\,sides \\ <br /> &amp; 1=1-2c \\ <br /> &amp; c=0 \\ <br /> &amp; So\,y&#039;(x)=\pm \frac{1}{y} \\ <br /> &amp; \pm ydy=dx \\ <br /> &amp; \pm \frac{1}{2}{{y}^{2}}=x+c \\ <br /> &amp; \pm \frac{1}{2}{{y}^{2}}(0)=\pm \frac{1}{2}=c \\ <br /> &amp; \therefore y(x)=\sqrt{2x\pm \frac{1}{2}} \\ <br /> \end{align}<br />

does that look ok?
 
Last edited:
I tried it again today with a fresh start and I ended up getting the same thing,
The thing that makes me sus about it is the +/- inside the square root
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K