Nonlinear Wave Equation (Nonlinear Helmholtz)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a nonlinear wave equation, specifically the nonlinear Helmholtz equation represented as a partial differential equation (PDE). The user attempts to utilize the 4th Order Runge-Kutta method in MATLAB for numerical solutions but faces convergence issues, particularly with high values of the loss coefficient, γ. The equation involves a complex permittivity ε(z) that is dependent on the intensity of the electric field |E(z)|². Suggestions include exploring soliton solutions in nonlinear optics and accounting for absorption due to the complex index of refraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with numerical methods, specifically 4th Order Runge-Kutta
  • Knowledge of nonlinear optics and soliton theory
  • Basic MATLAB programming skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research soliton solutions in nonlinear optics
  • Learn about numerical stability in solving PDEs
  • Explore alternative numerical methods for nonlinear equations, such as finite difference methods
  • Investigate the effects of complex permittivity on wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in the fields of nonlinear optics, applied mathematics, and numerical analysis, particularly those working on wave propagation and soliton dynamics.

jgk5141
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Looking to solve a nonlinear wave equation using some sort of numerical method. Struggling with convergence issues.
I am trying to solve a PDE (which I believe can be approximated as an ODE). I have tried to solve it using 4th Order Runge-Kutta in MATLAB, but have struggled with convergence, even at an extremely high number of steps (N=100,000,000). The PDE is:
\frac{\partial^2 E(z)}{\partial z^2} + \frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\epsilon(z)E(z)=0
Where \epsilon(z) = \epsilon[ 1 + i \gamma |E(z)|^2]. This is the "nonlinear" part where the imaginary part of the permittivity (\epsilon) is dependent on the intensity of the field (~ |E(z)|^2). The coefficient \gamma can be considered the Loss Coefficient. With low \gamma the intensity dependent term is negligible and the RK4 approach will converge, but with high intensities or higher \gamma then it blows up.

I am using the numerical outputs from another simulation to give the field and the value of it's derivative for initial conditions.

Any suggestions on how to solve this type of differential equation? Analytically or numerically? I do not have much experience in numerical methods.
 

Attachments

  • NL-RK4_High_Gamma.png
    NL-RK4_High_Gamma.png
    10 KB · Views: 250
  • NL-RK4_Low_Gamma.png
    NL-RK4_Low_Gamma.png
    16 KB · Views: 241
Physics news on Phys.org
Your d.e. describes non-linear optics. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton_(optics) for the closed form derivation that results in a soliton. You will have to account for absorption due to your complex index of refraction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K