Nonorganic Brain? Can Machines Think Like Humans?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain Organic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of whether non-organic systems, such as machines or artificial intelligence, can replicate human-like consciousness and cognitive functions. Participants explore the implications of material composition, particularly the role of carbon versus other elements, and the potential for emergent properties in non-organic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that consciousness and other emergent properties may arise from complex non-organic systems, questioning whether these properties are exclusive to organic materials like carbon.
  • Others argue that certain theories, such as those by Penrose and Chaitin, suggest that non-organic systems cannot replicate the human mind due to limitations in arithmetic or digital frameworks.
  • A participant mentions the possibility of creating non-algorithmic brains that differ fundamentally from current computers, raising questions about whether such systems could exhibit consciousness similar to organic brains.
  • There is speculation about silicon as an alternative material for creating non-organic brains, with the caveat that the emergent properties might differ significantly from those of carbon-based brains.
  • One participant notes the existence of AI robotic brains currently being developed, but expresses skepticism about achieving self-awareness in these systems, suggesting that consciousness may be an elusive force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus reached on whether non-organic systems can achieve human-like consciousness or the implications of material differences. The discussion remains unresolved with competing perspectives on the capabilities of non-organic brains.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific interpretations of consciousness and emergent properties, while others depend on the definitions of organic versus non-organic systems. The discussion also touches on the current technological limitations in creating complex non-organic systems.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Our brians are made out of organic material. It is very likely that the macro features we have such as consciousness, mind, qualia etc are an emergent property from these complex physical properties.

But could these emergent properties come from an extremely complicated device that is not made out of organic material? If the answer is yes than we will oneday have nonorganic things that function just like humans. If no than there must be something speical about carbon and the way it interacts with other chemical elements.

What do you think?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I know a few Brians and they are very complicated people.
 
One I know is definitely non-organic though; he loves GM crops!

Now if you meant a non-organic brain, note that there is nothing that prevents arbitrarily complex non-organic systems from existing in principle, though at the present time we may be technologically unable to produce them.

Some people, such as Penrose, use Goedel's theorems to infer that no arithmetic algorithmic non-organic system can every equal the human mind, which they assume to be trans-goedelian. Others like Chaitin use complexity theory to infer that no digital non-organic system can equal the numan mind, which they assume to be trans-complex.

I regard these views as (a) off the point and (b) in the last degree egotistical. For who ever said a non-organic system had to be arithmetic or digital? And where, aside from ego, do they get this human mind transcendence stuff?
 
Last edited:
of course there's something special baout carbon its the first of group 4A.
Go to your periodic table and read off the first few elements. Then go to standard astrophysics textbook and read about nuclear core burning in stars...Now this statement does not restrict human-like intelligence to just carbon. It just states that carbon is indeed special in the way the universe evolved. Go look for Blue Brain its an IBM research project on the brain, that is one of th efirst few to attempt to model the ENTIRE animal brain publicly.
 
selfAdjoint said:
One I know is definitely non-organic though; he loves GM crops!
Now if you meant a non-organic brain, note that there is nothing that prevents arbitrarily complex non-organic systems from existing in principle, though at the present time we may be technologically unable to produce them.
Some people, such as Penrose, use Goedel's theorems to infer that no arithmetic algorithmic non-organic system can every equal the human mind, which they assume to be trans-goedelian. Others like Chaitin use complexity theory to infer that no digital non-organic system can equal the numan mind, which they assume to be trans-complex.
I regard these views as (a) off the point and (b) in the last degree egotistical. For who ever said a non-organic system had to be arithmetic or digital? And where, aside from ego, do they get this human mind transcendence stuff?

If we make a brain that is non algorithmic than it wouldn't be like a computer as we know it. It would have to use a piece of technology fundalmentally different to anything we know today. Possible with some other element. But that poses the question, would that brian function just like an organic brian? I am a materialist and believe that unique functional properties correspond to unique materials that they are made out of. Properities like consciousness is highly complex and is an emergent property of our organic brian. Would such a thing emerge from material fundalmentally different to carbon?

I heard that silicon is an element that binds well with other elements. Maybe a brian made fundalmentally from silicon might work. But the properties that emerge out of this silicon brian might be vastly different to our carbon brian.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I know a few Brians and they are very complicated people.

I just noticed my wrong spelling. I meant brain.
 
Actually AI non-organic robotic brains are being created today in Japan and in some places in the US. These robots work using the same mechanics we human minds use but at a far more primitive stage. Their learning capacities are horrible and their vision is equally as horrible (if they really see at all).

But will we be able to ever create a robot with a non-organic brain with self-awareness? I doubt it but if we are to do so we have to find what part of the brain deals with self-aware conscious. Or perhaps consciousness is a force so mysterious (yet as natural as dark matter) that we may never find it (or something close to it anytime soon).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
24K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K