Norm 2, f Integrable function, show: ##||f-g||_2<\epsilon##

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physics1000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Norm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that for any integrable Riemann function \( F: [0, 2\pi] \to \mathbb{C} \), there exists a continuous and periodic function \( g \) such that \( ||f - g||_2 < \epsilon \) for all \( \epsilon > 0 \). Participants suggest using polynomial approximations and the properties of Riemann integrability to construct \( g \). Key strategies include leveraging the Weierstrass approximation theorem and addressing discontinuities by modifying \( f \) with continuous functions that ensure periodicity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrability and its properties.
  • Familiarity with \( L_2 \) norms and their applications in function approximation.
  • Knowledge of the Weierstrass approximation theorem for continuous functions.
  • Basic concepts of Fourier series and periodic functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Weierstrass approximation theorem in detail.
  • Learn about \( L_2 \) norms and their significance in functional analysis.
  • Explore the construction of periodic functions from non-periodic functions.
  • Investigate the properties of Fourier series and their convergence for integrable functions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone interested in the approximation of functions, particularly in the context of Riemann integrability and Fourier analysis.

physics1000
Messages
104
Reaction score
4
Let ##F:[0,2\pi] --> Complex##
##F## is integrable riemman.
show for all ##\epsilon>0## you can find a ##g##, continuous and periodic ##2\pi## s,t: ##||f-g||_2<\epsilon##
What I tried ( in short ), which is nothing almost, but all I know:
because g in continuous and periodic, according to Weirsterass sentence, we can find polynom ##P(X)## such that ##||g-p||_2<\epsilon##
and I know that, because f is integrable, ##||S_n(f)(x)-f(x)||_2<\epsilon##
But I dont know how to use the two of them to reach the answer, since I can not connect between p and f or to reach ##S_n(f)(x)## someway.
any tip will be welcomed!

EDIT:
Oww, I just noticed there is actually a fourier server here, I didnt see it because it said analysis and not fourier.
if needed, move it there please, if not, then you can keep it here :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple method: nth step of Riemann sum approx. to integral - within each section, place a constant = approx. to function used above except at ends of length ##\epsilon /(2n)##. Connect ends of remaining intervals by straight lines. This will give a continuous curve with integral ~ ##\epsilon## of approx. sum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics1000
mathman said:
Simple method: nth step of Riemann sum approx. to integral - within each section, place a constant = approx. to function used above except at ends of length ##\epsilon /(2n)##. Connect ends of remaining intervals by straight lines. This will give a continuous curve with integral ~ ##\epsilon## of approx. sum.
Ahh forgot to mention, I know we can solve it using Riemann method, but I understand that concept real hard. we have not touched Riemann since calculus two ( integrable subject ).
Is there not any way with norms maybe? :(
I really do not know anything already with riemann
 
physics1000 said:
Let ##F:[0,2\pi] --> Complex##
##F## is integrable riemman.
show for all ##\epsilon>0## you can find a ##g##, continuous and periodic ##2\pi## s,t: ##||f-g||_2<\epsilon##
What I tried ( in short ), which is nothing almost, but all I know:
because g in continuous and periodic, according to Weirsterass sentence, we can find polynom ##P(X)## such that ##||g-p||_2<\epsilon##
and I know that, because f is integrable, ##||S_n(f)(x)-f(x)||_2<\epsilon##
But I dont know how to use the two of them to reach the answer, since I can not connect between p and f or to reach ##S_n(f)(x)## someway.
any tip will be welcomed!

EDIT:
Oww, I just noticed there is actually a fourier server here, I didnt see it because it said analysis and not fourier.
if needed, move it there please, if not, then you can keep it here :)

The point here is that g must periodic and continuous, but f is only defined on [0,2\pi] and is merely Riemann integrable. However, if f is L_2-equivalent to a continuous function f_c, in the sense that \|f - f_c\|_2 = 0, then you can clearly work with f_c instead.

A starting point is to consider the periodic extension of f, and deal with the ways in which it might fail to be continuous. One obvious problem is that you are not given that f(0) = f(2\pi). But you can deal with that by multiplying f by a continuous function which is 1 everywhere except in small neighbourhoods of 0 and 2\pi, where it rapidly adjusts to zero; for example, the following family of functions for \delta &gt; 0: <br /> h_\delta: [0, 2\pi] \to \mathbb{R}: x \mapsto \begin{cases} \frac x\delta &amp; 0 \leq x &lt; \delta \\<br /> 1 &amp; \delta \leq x \leq 2\pi - \delta \\<br /> \frac{2\pi - x}{2\pi - \delta} &amp; 2\pi - \delta &lt; x \leq 2\pi. \end{cases}
Another problem is that although you know that f is Riemann integrable, so its discontinuities are confined to a set of measure zero, you are not actually told that f is continuous. If it isn't L_2-equivalent to a continuous function, then you will need to take a similar approach at each point of discontinuity.

It remains to show that this approach results in a continuous periodic function g such that \|g - f\|_2 &lt; \epsilon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics1000
pasmith said:
The point here is that g must periodic and continuous, but f is only defined on [0,2\pi] and is merely Riemann integrable. However, if f is L_2-equivalent to a continuous function f_c, in the sense that \|f - f_c\|_2 = 0, then you can clearly work with f_c instead.

A starting point is to consider the periodic extension of f, and deal with the ways in which it might fail to be continuous. One obvious problem is that you are not given that f(0) = f(2\pi). But you can deal with that by multiplying f by a continuous function which is 1 everywhere except in small neighbourhoods of 0 and 2\pi, where it rapidly adjusts to zero; for example, the following family of functions for \delta &gt; 0: <br /> h_\delta: [0, 2\pi] \to \mathbb{R}: x \mapsto \begin{cases} \frac x\delta &amp; 0 \leq x &lt; \delta \\<br /> 1 &amp; \delta \leq x \leq 2\pi - \delta \\<br /> \frac{2\pi - x}{2\pi - \delta} &amp; 2\pi - \delta &lt; x \leq 2\pi. \end{cases}
Another problem is that although you know that f is Riemann integrable, so its discontinuities are confined to a set of measure zero, you are not actually told that f is continuous. If it isn't L_2-equivalent to a continuous function, then you will need to take a similar approach at each point of discontinuity.

It remains to show that this approach results in a continuous periodic function g such that \|g - f\|_2 &lt; \epsilon.
Ahh, I thought I could skip the delta's part, I guess its impossible.
Thanks, I will try to work with it :)
 
What about this: ##\int_0^xf(t)dt## is continuous, so can be approximated by some polynomial ##G(x)##. ##G'(x)## is a polynomial that approximates ##f## in the ##L_2## sense (I haven't checked this works but it feels like it must) then tweak the endpoints to make it periodic.

Edit: OK, this isn't going to work easily. For example ##F(x)=x## is uniformly approximatws by ##G(x)=x+\epsilon \sin(x/\epsilon)## to arbitrary precision as ##\epsilon\to 0## but ##F'=1## and ##G'=1+\cos(x/\epsilon)##.

This isn't quite the same situation since ##G## isn't a polynomial and ##G## is the sequence that is a good approximator, but if you can find a sequence of good polynomials it's probably hard to describe them and prove they work.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K