Norm 2, f Integrable function, show: ##||f-g||_2<\epsilon##

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physics1000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Norm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of finding a continuous and periodic function \( g \) such that the \( L_2 \) norm \( ||f-g||_2 < \epsilon \) for a given integrable function \( f \) defined on the interval \([0, 2\pi]\). Participants explore various methods and approaches to demonstrate this relationship, touching on concepts from Riemann integration, polynomial approximation, and periodic extensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the Weierstrass approximation theorem to find a polynomial \( P(X) \) that approximates \( g \) such that \( ||g - P||_2 < \epsilon \), but struggles to connect this with \( f \).
  • Another participant proposes a method involving Riemann sums to approximate the integral and create a continuous curve, although they express difficulty with the Riemann method.
  • A later reply discusses the need for \( g \) to be periodic and continuous, while \( f \) is only Riemann integrable, and introduces the idea of using a continuous function to adjust \( f \) near its endpoints to ensure periodicity.
  • Some participants mention the challenge of ensuring \( f \) is \( L_2 \)-equivalent to a continuous function and suggest methods to handle discontinuities in \( f \).
  • One participant considers approximating the integral of \( f \) with a polynomial \( G(x) \) and discusses the difficulties in ensuring that the derivative \( G'(x) \) approximates \( f \) in the \( L_2 \) sense.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and ideas, but there is no consensus on a single approach to solve the problem. Multiple competing views and techniques are presented, with some participants questioning the feasibility of certain methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions about the continuity of \( f \) and the specific conditions required for the approximation methods to hold. There is also mention of the challenges posed by the endpoints of the interval and the need for adjustments to ensure periodicity.

physics1000
Messages
104
Reaction score
4
Let ##F:[0,2\pi] --> Complex##
##F## is integrable riemman.
show for all ##\epsilon>0## you can find a ##g##, continuous and periodic ##2\pi## s,t: ##||f-g||_2<\epsilon##
What I tried ( in short ), which is nothing almost, but all I know:
because g in continuous and periodic, according to Weirsterass sentence, we can find polynom ##P(X)## such that ##||g-p||_2<\epsilon##
and I know that, because f is integrable, ##||S_n(f)(x)-f(x)||_2<\epsilon##
But I dont know how to use the two of them to reach the answer, since I can not connect between p and f or to reach ##S_n(f)(x)## someway.
any tip will be welcomed!

EDIT:
Oww, I just noticed there is actually a fourier server here, I didnt see it because it said analysis and not fourier.
if needed, move it there please, if not, then you can keep it here :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple method: nth step of Riemann sum approx. to integral - within each section, place a constant = approx. to function used above except at ends of length ##\epsilon /(2n)##. Connect ends of remaining intervals by straight lines. This will give a continuous curve with integral ~ ##\epsilon## of approx. sum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics1000
mathman said:
Simple method: nth step of Riemann sum approx. to integral - within each section, place a constant = approx. to function used above except at ends of length ##\epsilon /(2n)##. Connect ends of remaining intervals by straight lines. This will give a continuous curve with integral ~ ##\epsilon## of approx. sum.
Ahh forgot to mention, I know we can solve it using Riemann method, but I understand that concept real hard. we have not touched Riemann since calculus two ( integrable subject ).
Is there not any way with norms maybe? :(
I really do not know anything already with riemann
 
physics1000 said:
Let ##F:[0,2\pi] --> Complex##
##F## is integrable riemman.
show for all ##\epsilon>0## you can find a ##g##, continuous and periodic ##2\pi## s,t: ##||f-g||_2<\epsilon##
What I tried ( in short ), which is nothing almost, but all I know:
because g in continuous and periodic, according to Weirsterass sentence, we can find polynom ##P(X)## such that ##||g-p||_2<\epsilon##
and I know that, because f is integrable, ##||S_n(f)(x)-f(x)||_2<\epsilon##
But I dont know how to use the two of them to reach the answer, since I can not connect between p and f or to reach ##S_n(f)(x)## someway.
any tip will be welcomed!

EDIT:
Oww, I just noticed there is actually a fourier server here, I didnt see it because it said analysis and not fourier.
if needed, move it there please, if not, then you can keep it here :)

The point here is that g must periodic and continuous, but f is only defined on [0,2\pi] and is merely Riemann integrable. However, if f is L_2-equivalent to a continuous function f_c, in the sense that \|f - f_c\|_2 = 0, then you can clearly work with f_c instead.

A starting point is to consider the periodic extension of f, and deal with the ways in which it might fail to be continuous. One obvious problem is that you are not given that f(0) = f(2\pi). But you can deal with that by multiplying f by a continuous function which is 1 everywhere except in small neighbourhoods of 0 and 2\pi, where it rapidly adjusts to zero; for example, the following family of functions for \delta &gt; 0: <br /> h_\delta: [0, 2\pi] \to \mathbb{R}: x \mapsto \begin{cases} \frac x\delta &amp; 0 \leq x &lt; \delta \\<br /> 1 &amp; \delta \leq x \leq 2\pi - \delta \\<br /> \frac{2\pi - x}{2\pi - \delta} &amp; 2\pi - \delta &lt; x \leq 2\pi. \end{cases}
Another problem is that although you know that f is Riemann integrable, so its discontinuities are confined to a set of measure zero, you are not actually told that f is continuous. If it isn't L_2-equivalent to a continuous function, then you will need to take a similar approach at each point of discontinuity.

It remains to show that this approach results in a continuous periodic function g such that \|g - f\|_2 &lt; \epsilon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics1000
pasmith said:
The point here is that g must periodic and continuous, but f is only defined on [0,2\pi] and is merely Riemann integrable. However, if f is L_2-equivalent to a continuous function f_c, in the sense that \|f - f_c\|_2 = 0, then you can clearly work with f_c instead.

A starting point is to consider the periodic extension of f, and deal with the ways in which it might fail to be continuous. One obvious problem is that you are not given that f(0) = f(2\pi). But you can deal with that by multiplying f by a continuous function which is 1 everywhere except in small neighbourhoods of 0 and 2\pi, where it rapidly adjusts to zero; for example, the following family of functions for \delta &gt; 0: <br /> h_\delta: [0, 2\pi] \to \mathbb{R}: x \mapsto \begin{cases} \frac x\delta &amp; 0 \leq x &lt; \delta \\<br /> 1 &amp; \delta \leq x \leq 2\pi - \delta \\<br /> \frac{2\pi - x}{2\pi - \delta} &amp; 2\pi - \delta &lt; x \leq 2\pi. \end{cases}
Another problem is that although you know that f is Riemann integrable, so its discontinuities are confined to a set of measure zero, you are not actually told that f is continuous. If it isn't L_2-equivalent to a continuous function, then you will need to take a similar approach at each point of discontinuity.

It remains to show that this approach results in a continuous periodic function g such that \|g - f\|_2 &lt; \epsilon.
Ahh, I thought I could skip the delta's part, I guess its impossible.
Thanks, I will try to work with it :)
 
What about this: ##\int_0^xf(t)dt## is continuous, so can be approximated by some polynomial ##G(x)##. ##G'(x)## is a polynomial that approximates ##f## in the ##L_2## sense (I haven't checked this works but it feels like it must) then tweak the endpoints to make it periodic.

Edit: OK, this isn't going to work easily. For example ##F(x)=x## is uniformly approximatws by ##G(x)=x+\epsilon \sin(x/\epsilon)## to arbitrary precision as ##\epsilon\to 0## but ##F'=1## and ##G'=1+\cos(x/\epsilon)##.

This isn't quite the same situation since ##G## isn't a polynomial and ##G## is the sequence that is a good approximator, but if you can find a sequence of good polynomials it's probably hard to describe them and prove they work.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K