Norm of operator vs. norm of its inverse

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Norm Operator
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 23K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Are there any circumstances under which we can conclude that, for an invertible, bounded linear operator T,

[tex] \| T^{-1} \| = \frac{1}{\| T \|} ?[/tex]

E.g., does this always hold if we know the inverse is bounded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this doesn't even hold for finite-dimensional spaces! (i.e. for matrices).

Consider the matrix

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)[/tex].

The norm of this operator is 2. However, the inverse operator is

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1/2 & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)[/tex]

and this has norm 1.

However, you do have an inequality (for bounded operators of course): Since [tex]1=\|id\|=\|TT^{-1}\|\leq \|T\|\|T^{-1}\|[/tex], it follows that [tex]\frac{1}{\|T\|}\leq \|T^{-1}\|[/tex].
 
Or simpler, the 1x1-matrix (a) has inverse (1/a), and these have norms a and 1/a, respectively :p

In general, it's good advice to test statements in functional analysis in the easy case of finite dimensions first.
 
Landau said:
Or simpler, the 1x1-matrix (a) has inverse (1/a), and these have norms a and 1/a, respectively :p

In general, it's good advice to test statements in functional analysis in the easy case of finite dimensions first.

Good advice. Thanks to all of you :biggrin: