Is it correct to say that independent random events (additively) lead to a normal distribution, and dependent random events (multiplicatively) lead to a power law distribution?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following might be trivial, but it was quite interesting to find for me, someone with a very limited knowledge of mathematics or statistics:

Take a matrix of random numbers r(i,j), where 0 < r(i,j) < 1.

Let S(i) = int( ( r(i,1) + r(i,2) +...+ r(i,j) )*n ), with S(i) >= S(i-1) if i >= i-1, that is, S is a sorted list of the integer parts of the sums of random numbers multiplied by an integer.

Let P(i) = int( ( r(i,1) * r(i,2) * ... * r(i,j) )*n ), with P(i) >= P(i-1) if i >= i-1, that is P is a sorted list of the integer parts of the products of random numbers multiplied by an integer.

Hypothesis (based simply on observation of graphs of S(i) and P(i)):

the higher the values of i and j, the more S(i) approximates normal distribution, and P(i) approximates a power-law distribution.

Is this right?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Normal and power law distributions

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**