- 1,864
- 34
What properties does some measurement possesses such that they fit along a normal curve? And how was the general formula found? Wikipedia says very little on this.
The discussion centers on the properties of measurements that fit a normal distribution, the origins of the normal distribution formula, and the assumptions underlying these concepts. It explores theoretical aspects, particularly the Central Limit Theorem, and its implications for the nature of errors in measurements.
Participants express various viewpoints regarding the assumptions necessary for measurements to fit a normal distribution, particularly concerning the independence of errors. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the nature of these assumptions.
Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of independence and randomness, as well as the unresolved nature of how these concepts directly lead to a normal distribution.
The normal distribution comes out of one of the fundamental theorems in probability theory "Central Limit Theorem". The general idea is that when adding up, and properly normalizing, a large number of independent random variables, the distribution of the result is approximately normal.Jarle said:What properties does some measurement possesses such that they fit along a normal curve? And how was the general formula found? Wikipedia says very little on this.
mathman said:The normal distribution comes out of one of the fundamental theorems in probability theory "Central Limit Theorem". The general idea is that when adding up, and properly normalizing, a large number of independent random variables, the distribution of the result is approximately normal.
The errors are random in nature, independent from each other. If there is a systematic error, it will show up as an error in the mean (assuming you have a theoretical mean to compare).Jarle said:What assumptions are we making about the nature of our measurements when we assume they will fit the normal curve?
mathman said:The errors are random in nature, independent from each other. If there is a systematic error, it will show up as an error in the mean (assuming you have a theoretical mean to compare).
Jarle said:How does the independence of errors imply that it is normally distributed?