Normal force on block placed on incline.2 approaches different result

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the normal force exerted on a block placed on a 30° incline based on different orientations of an applied force F. The original poster attempts to analyze the problem using two different coordinate frames and expresses confusion regarding the results obtained from these approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of using different coordinate systems for analyzing forces acting on the block. The original poster questions why one approach yields illogical results compared to another. There is also mention of the normal force's behavior in relation to the incline and the applied force.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the normal force and the effects of different axes on the analysis. There is recognition of the complexity introduced by the choice of coordinate systems, and the discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The problem statement specifies that the force directions are either horizontal or vertical, and that the normal force is to be ranked based on its magnitude. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the forces acting on the block and the conditions for equilibrium.

Curieuse
Messages
51
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The problem wants me to order the choice for the directions of a force F of a constant magnitude F(a,b,c,d are unit vectors along which F has to be oriented) exerted on the block placed on an incline at 30° to the horizontal based on the normal force Fn that the incline would exert on the block in each case. attached: w.jpg is the pic with the question

2. The attempt at a solution
I've attempted this from two coordinate frames! One inclined with the plane and the other horizontally aligned with the base of the incline! And I get the solutions as attached! I want to know why the question marked approach gives haywire answers! The other approach is for reference!
The first is the legit answer and the next one is easier because of the chosen orientation of the frame of reference but the results are illogical. Why?
0002 is the legit answer and 0003 is the illogical one
 

Attachments

  • w.JPG
    w.JPG
    6.5 KB · Views: 567
  • scan0003.jpg
    scan0003.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 648
  • scan0002.jpg
    scan0002.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 560
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please right click on the images and open in a new tab. that must help!
 
I am not sure what you are trying to find. The normal force acts perpendicular to the incline no matter what reference axes you choose.
The normal force is mgcostheta no matter what reference axes you choose. You can find components of that force in the horiz and vert directions if you want. It is a little messy when you choose horiz and vert axes instead of choosing the x-axis parallel to incline and y-axis perp to incline.when so doing, the normal force has an x comp of Nsintheta left and Ncostheta up.
 
Yes. That's exactly the glitch i found. And about the problem statement which i messed up.. I quote:
"Figure w.jpg shows four choices for the direction of a force of magnitude F to be applied to a block on an inclined plane. The directions are either horizontal or vertical.(For choices a and b, the force is not enough to lift the block off the plane). Rank the choices according to the magnitude of the normal force on the block from the plane- greatest first." And I arrived at the order d>c>a>b, which seems logically legit. The illogical one is tormenting.
As far as the 'a' choice in direction is considered, I see that the horizontal components:
F+FNsin 30°=0
This i think is messed up because, as the acceleration in the x direction is zero and the two forces acting to the left do not have magnitudes as equal to zero, there must be some force that is the negative vector of the resultant due to these above forces acting on the body to cancel stuff out so that there's no acceleration in the horizontal way.. I wonder what that force would be, because clearly the normal force doesn't have any components in a direction opposite to F leave alone the fact that the component is in the same direction as F.
 
No matter which set of axes you choose, the acceleration can only be parallel to the surface. Thus, if you use axes oriented horizontally and vertically, realize that each of those axes will have a component of acceleration. (That's why using axes parallel and perpendicular to the surface is easier. No acceleration perpendicular to the surface.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks Doc al! I didn't see that the block could accelerate well. :P
 
SaiSwetha said:
Thanks Doc al! I didn't see that the block could accelerate well. :P
:thumbs:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K