Normal force acting on a block on an accelerating wedge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a block placed on a frictionless wedge that is accelerating. Participants are trying to determine the normal force acting on the block while considering the effects of the wedge's acceleration and the forces involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to draw free body diagrams (FBDs) and establish equations of motion. There are questions about the reference frames for acceleration and the nature of forces acting on the block.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the problem, including the creation of equations and consideration of the wedge's non-inertial frame. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the wedge's acceleration on the forces acting on the block.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the frictionless nature of the wedge and the assumptions about the reference frames being used. Participants are questioning the validity of certain force components and their relationships in the context of the problem.

Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
I created this stupid question to help me better understand Newtonian mechanics.
Relevant Equations
N/A
1595707881568.png

We have a wedge whose surface is ##\theta## from the horizontal surface. After a block is placed on its frictionless slant surface, the wedge starts to accelerate due to a force F. What is the normal force acting upon the block?

I have been trying to solve it but I got no clue. Could someone give me a hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First step: draw separate FBDs for the two components, showing forces. Next, create variables for the accelerations. Third, write the ΣF=ma equations and any appropriate kinematic equations that express relationships between the accelerations.
For that last, you need to represent the fact that the block stays on the wedge surface.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu
haruspex said:
First step: draw separate FBDs for the two components, showing forces. Next, create variables for the accelerations. Third, write the ΣF=ma equations and any appropriate kinematic equations that express relationships between the accelerations.
For that last, you need to represent the fact that the block stays on the wedge surface.

Hi. The constraints in this problem gives these four distinct equations. Could you tell me if they are correct?
2020_07_25 22_05 Office Lens.jpg

Answer:
$$\begin{pmatrix}
a_{sx}\\a_{sy}\\a_t\\N
\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}
0\\0\\-mg\\F
\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}
\tan \theta & 1 & 0 & 0\\
m & 0 & m & -sin \theta\\
0 & m & 0 & -\cos \theta\\
0 & 0 & M & \sin \theta
\end{pmatrix}^{-1}$$
 
Last edited:
Is asx the horizontal acceleration of the block in the lab frame or in the frame of the wedge?
 
If you define the height and leg of the wedge as ##h## and ##\ell##, then the net force on the block in the wedge's reference frame is in the direction of ##(\ell, -h)##. Since we know that the net force's norm is ##g\sin\theta##, we can describe it by ##\vec f_{b|w} = \frac{g\sin\theta}{\sqrt{\ell^2+h^2}}(\ell, -h)##. I think that this might work (you can find the block's absolute acceleration from this since you know the wedge's acceleration).$$\vec a_{b|w}=\vec a_b-\vec a_w$$The block starts falling from the top, so i think that it okay that we are considering the whole wedge to be only the topmost point (so that ##\vec x_b(0)-\vec x_w(0)=\vec y_b(0)-\vec y_w(0)=\vec 0##).
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Is asx the horizontal acceleration of the block in the lab frame or in the frame of the wedge?
The frame of the wedge; since it is an non inertial frame, I added the acceleration of the frame to get the real acceleration.
 
Leo Liu said:
The frame of the wedge; since it is an non inertial frame, I added the acceleration of the frame to get the real acceleration.
Then it all looks fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu
archaic said:
the net force's norm is ##g\sin\theta##
Can you please tell me why this isn't ##\mu N##? I don't think you can use the component of the weight vector to calculate the sliding friction force.
 
Leo Liu said:
Can you please tell me why this isn't ##\mu N##? I don't think you can use the component of the weight vector to calculate the sliding friction force.
Oh, that isn't the frictional force. You mentioned that your surface is frictionless, right? I meant by ##\vec f## the net force on the block.
Sorry, I shouldn't even have answered without reading your post well. I just assumed some things. :sorry:
 
  • #10
The normal force would be in the direction of ##(\sin\theta,\cos\theta)## and with norm ##mg\cos\theta##, so:$$\vec N=mg\cos\theta(\sin\theta,\cos\theta)$$The force I have written in my other post has a missing ##m## factor. It should be:$$\vec f_{b|w}=mg\sin\theta(\cos\theta,-\sin\theta)$$
 
  • #11
archaic said:
The normal force would be in the direction of ##(\sin\theta,\cos\theta)## and with norm ##mg\cos\theta##, so:$$\vec N=mg\cos\theta(\sin\theta,\cos\theta)$$The force I have written in my other post has a missing ##m## factor. It should be:$$\vec f_{b|w}=mg\sin\theta(\cos\theta,-\sin\theta)$$
I don't think this is the case since the wedge is accelerating.
 
  • #12
Leo Liu said:
I don't think this is the case since the wedge is accelerating.
Those are in the wedge's frame of reference. But yeah, I'm not sure if that relative acceleration formula in my first post is usable in this problem.
 
  • #13
Please ignore my posts; the wedge is not an inertial frame of reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K