Normal Modes and Normal Frequencies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the normal modes and frequencies of a coupled oscillation system described by the differential equations: \(\ddot{x_A}+2(\omega_0^2+\tilde{\omega_0}^2)x_A-\omega_0^2x_B = 0\) and \(\ddot{x_B}+2\omega_0^2x_B-\omega_0^2x_A = 0\). The user initially derived four solutions for the normal mode frequency \(\omega\) but later identified errors in their calculations. The correct approach leads to two distinct normal mode frequencies, which correspond to the oscillations of masses A and B moving in the same or opposite directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coupled oscillations and normal modes
  • Familiarity with differential equations in physics
  • Knowledge of natural frequencies and their significance in oscillatory systems
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normal modes in coupled oscillators
  • Learn about the implications of negative frequencies in oscillatory systems
  • Explore the concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in the context of normal modes
  • Investigate the role of symmetry in coupled oscillation systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and oscillatory systems, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of normal modes and frequencies in coupled systems.

RicardoMP
Messages
48
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have to determine the frequencies of the normal modes of oscillation for the system I've uploaded.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I determined the following differential equations for the coupled system:
\ddot{x_A}+2(\omega_0^2+\tilde{\omega_0}^2)x_A-\omega_0^2x_B = 0
\ddot{x_B}+2\omega_0^2x_B-\omega_0^2x_A = 0
which I confirmed are correct.

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the usual normal modes solutions are:
x_A=Ccos(\omega t)
x_B=C'cos(\omega t)
where C and C' are the amplitudes for each of the oscillating masses and \omega is the associated normal mode frequency. Therefore, I proceeded by determining the ratio \frac{C}{C'} for each equation, after substituting the solutions in the differential equations.
\frac{C}{C'}=\frac{\omega_0^2}{-\omega^2 +2\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2} and \frac{C}{C'}=\frac{-\omega^2+2\omega_0^2}{\omega_0^2}
My problem now is that, when I try to determine the solutions for \omega, I arrive to 4 solutions of the form:
\omega=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-(-4\omega_0^2 -2\tilde{\omega_0})\pm \sqrt{(-4\omega_0^2 -2\tilde{\omega_0})^2 -4(-4\omega_0^2 -2\tilde{\omega_0})(3\omega_0^3 +4\tilde{\omega_0}\omega_0)}}{2}}
which I think it's wrong, since with these solutions I don't even know how to schematically draw the normal modes with these kind of solutions. So is my solving method wrong or is this method only applicable to symmetric systems? Did I get the calculations wrong? Is there another way to solve this problem?
Thank you in advance!
 

Attachments

  • modosnormais.PNG
    modosnormais.PNG
    13.9 KB · Views: 542
Physics news on Phys.org
RicardoMP said:

Homework Statement


I have to determine the frequencies of the normal modes of oscillation for the system I've uploaded.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I determined the following differential equations for the coupled system:
\ddot{x_A}+2(\omega_0^2+\tilde{\omega_0}^2)x_A-\omega_0^2x_B = 0
\ddot{x_B}+2\omega_0^2x_B-\omega_0^2x_A = 0
which I confirmed are correct.

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the usual normal modes solutions are:
x_A=Ccos(\omega t)
x_B=C'cos(\omega t)
where C and C' are the amplitudes for each of the oscillating masses and \omega is the associated normal mode frequency. Therefore, I proceeded by determining the ratio \frac{C}{C'} for each equation, after substituting the solutions in the differential equations.
\frac{C}{C'}=\frac{\omega_0^2}{-\omega^2 +2\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2} and \frac{C}{C'}=\frac{-\omega^2+2\omega_0^2}{\omega_0^2}*
My problem now is that, when I try to determine the solutions for \omega, I arrive to 4 solutions of the form:
\omega=\pm \sqrt{\frac{-(-4\omega_0^2 -2\tilde{\omega_0})\pm \sqrt{(-4\omega_0^2 -2\tilde{\omega_0})^2 -4(-4\omega_0^2 -2\tilde{\omega_0})(3\omega_0^3 +4\tilde{\omega_0}\omega_0)}}{2}}
which I think it's wrong, since with these solutions I don't even know how to schematically draw the normal modes with these kind of solutions. So is my solving method wrong or is this method only applicable to symmetric systems? Did I get the calculations wrong? Is there another way to solve this problem?
Thank you in advance!
What are the data? The masses of A and B, the spring constants. What do the ω 0-s mean?
Assuming your derivation is correct up to *, the last equation perhaps is not. First, ω should not be negative. Solve for ω2. You get two ω2-s, that is, two normal-mode frequencies, which correspond two kinds of motion of A and B, (in the same direction and in opposite directions). Check the powers and simplify the expression for ω2. Show your work. One can not find your mistakes without seeing it.
 
ehild said:
What are the data? The masses of A and B, the spring constants. What do the ω 0-s mean?
Assuming your derivation is correct up to *, the last equation perhaps is not. First, ω should not be negative. Solve for ω2. You get two ω2-s, that is, two normal-mode frequencies, which correspond two kinds of motion of A and B, (in the same direction and in opposite directions). Check the powers and simplify the expression for ω2. Show your work. One can not find your mistakes without seeing it.
The relevant information for this problem is that the masses are the same m_A=m_B. The \omega_0 and \tilde{\omega_0} are the natural frequencies associated with each spring. The long springs have constant \tilde{k}, so \tilde{\omega_0}=\sqrt{\frac{\tilde{k}}{m}}. The short springs have constant k, so \omega_0=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}. Sorry for the lack of information.
So, assuming that up to * I'm correct (which I verified again), my calculations are the following:
(-\omega^2 + 2\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0^2})(-\omega^2+2\omega_0^2)=(\omega_0^2)^2
I call my \omega^2 = a, so a^2-2\omega_0^2a-2\omega_0^2a+4\omega_0^4-2\tilde{\omega_0}a+4\tilde{\omega_0}\omega_0=(\omega_0^2)^2.
And that's it. I solve the quadratic equation for \omega^2 and get the last equation in my original post without the large square root.
 
I found at least one mistake, when solving the quadratic equation, dumb me!
The final equation I get, solving the quadratic equation for \omega^2 is :
\omega^2=\frac{(4\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2)\pm \sqrt{(4\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2)^2-4(3\omega_0^4+4\omega_0^2 \tilde{\omega_0^2}})}{2}
and therefore:
\omega^2=\frac{(4\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2)\pm 2\sqrt{\omega_0^4+\tilde{\omega_0^4}}}{2}
 
RicardoMP said:
So, assuming that up to * I'm correct (which I verified again), my calculations are the following:
(-\omega^2 + 2\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0^2})(-\omega^2+2\omega_0^2)=(\omega_0^2)^2
I call my \omega^2 = a, so a^2-2\omega_0^2a-2\omega_0^2a+4\omega_0^4-2\tilde{\omega_0}a+4\tilde{\omega_0}\omega_0=(\omega_0^2)^2.
.
You have mistakes again with powers and tilde.
 
ehild said:
You have mistakes again with powers and tilde.
Yes, just corrected it in the reply above. Is my solving method correct at least? Won't I have 4 solutions for \omega?
 
RicardoMP said:
Yes, just corrected it in the reply above. Is my solving method correct at least? Won't I have 4 solutions for \omega?

RicardoMP said:
I found at least one mistake, when solving the quadratic equation, dumb me!
The final equation I get, solving the quadratic equation for \omega^2 is :
\omega^2=\frac{(4\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2)\pm \sqrt{(4\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2)^2-4(3\omega_0^4+4\omega_0^2 \tilde{\omega_0^2}})}{2}
and therefore:
\omega^2=\frac{(4\omega_0^2+2\tilde{\omega_0}^2)\pm 2\sqrt{\omega_0^4+\tilde{\omega_0^4}}}{2}
It looks correct. Simplify by 2.
You get two values for ω2, and ω can not be negative, so it is 2 solutions for ω.
Remember, the solutions are of the form C*cos(ωt). Do you get different solution with -ω?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
987
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K