Normal subgroups and Abelian property

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter soumyashant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Property
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between normal subgroups and the abelian property of groups. Participants explore whether a group with all normal subgroups must be abelian, seeking counter-examples and discussing properties of specific groups.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that a group with all normal subgroups is not necessarily abelian and requests a counter-example.
  • Another participant suggests the quaternion group Q as a fruitful candidate for a nonabelian counter-example, noting that it has all normal subgroups and contains noncommuting elements.
  • A participant reflects on their attempts to find counter-examples using dihedral groups and the Klein four group, which is abelian and thus not suitable.
  • There is a discussion about the properties of the Klein four group and the quaternion group, highlighting similarities and differences in their structure.
  • Questions arise regarding the existence of a generalized quaternion group and the conditions under which a subgroup generated by two elements can be isomorphic to the quaternion group.
  • Concerns are raised about the cardinality of groups and the implications for isomorphism, with a participant recalling that the proof of isomorphism may be more complex than initially outlined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a group with all normal subgroups is not abelian, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the counter-examples or the conditions for isomorphism with the quaternion group.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of proofs regarding isomorphism and the specific properties of groups being discussed, which may not be fully resolved in the conversation.

soumyashant
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If all subgroups of a group are normal, is the group abelian?
I know that the answer is NO...

Can you give a counter-example..?

Better still can you logically deduce some property the counter-example must have, which will ease our way to finding it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whenever you want to look for a nonabelian counterexample, it's usually good to try the quaternion group Q first (and then the symmetric and dihedral groups!). In the case at hand this strategy is particularly fruitful, because
(1) Q does have this property (all its subgroups are normal), and
(2) every group which has this property contains a copy of Q as a subgroup.

The idea is that if the group G which we're after is nonabelian, then it contains two noncommuting elements x and y in G. If we let Q0 be the subgroup of G generated by x and y, then it can be shown that Q0 is isomorphic to the quaternion group. For a proof, see Rotman's Theory of Groups.
 
Thanks for the example and the suggestion...

Firs thing I tried with was dihedral groups and was unsuccessful, quaternion groups never crossed my mind...
I tried with the Klein four subgroup (dihedral group with [tex]x^2=e,y^2=e[/tex]) which satisfies the condition, but is Abelian and thus obviously ahould satisfy the conditions ,of no use...

A little more patience may have helped because the quaternion group is similar to Klein four group...

For example,
In Klein four subgroup, [tex]x^2=y^2=z^2=e[/tex] and [tex]xy=z,yz=x,xz=y[/tex]
And in quaternion,[tex]x^2=y^2=z^2=-e[/tex] and [tex]xy=z,yz=x,zx=y[/tex]
morphism said:
The idea is that if the group G which we're after is nonabelian, then it contains two noncommuting elements x and y in G. If we let Q0 be the subgroup of G generated by x and y, then it can be shown that Q0 is isomorphic to the quaternion group. For a proof, see Rotman's Theory of Groups.

Is there some general quaternion group??
I only know of the quaternion group of order 8...

In that case, how can we have bijection between the subgroup generated by [tex]x,y[/tex] and quaternion group if their cardinality is not the same and thus, isomorphism??...

EDIT: In Wikipedia, I see something called the generalised quaternion group, did you mean that??
 
Last edited:
soumyashant said:
Is there some general quaternion group??
I only know of the quaternion group of order 8...

In that case, how can we have bijection between the subgroup generated by [tex]x,y[/tex] and quaternion group if their cardinality is not the same and thus, isomorphism??...
Maybe my outline of the proof was overly simplistic. I don't remember much of it, but what I do remember is that you can always choose two appropriate noncommuting elements x and y such that the group generated by {x,y} is isomorphic to the quaternion group of order 8. The proof isn't exactly easy though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K