Normal subgroups (Sylow Theorem)

  • Context:
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathgirl1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Theorem
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
mathgirl1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Let G be a group of order [tex]pm[/tex] where p is a prime and p > m. Suppose H is a subgroup of order p. Show that H is normal in G.

There is a very similar problem

Let |G| = [tex]p^nm[/tex] where p is a prime and [tex]n \ge 1, p > m[/tex]. Show that the Sylow p-subgroup of G is normal in G.

Proof:
Let [tex]n_p[/tex] be the number of Sylow p-subgroups of G. By the 3-d Sylow Subgroup Theorem we know that [tex]n_p \mid m[/tex] and that [tex]n_p \equiv 1 (mod p)[/tex]. Since m < p and [tex]n_p \mid m[/tex], it follows that [tex]1 \le n_p \le m < p[/tex]. Since we also know that [tex]n_p \equiv 1 (mod p)[/tex], it follows that [tex]n_p=1[/tex]. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Since for every [tex]g \in G[/tex], [tex]g^{-1}Pg[/tex] is also a Sylow p-subgroup of G and since [tex]n_p=1[/tex], it follows that for every [tex]g \in G[/tex] that [tex]g^{-1}Pg=P[/tex]. Hence P is normal in G, as claimed.

So this is the same problem that I need to solve with n=1. Is there a way to solve this without Sylow Theorems or Sylow subgroups? We barely covered that so not sure we can use it to prove this problem.

Also, why is [tex]g^{-1}Pg[/tex] also a Sylow p-subgroup of G since P is?

Any help is appreciated. I would like to solve this problem without Sylow theorems but not sure where to start cause I am already stuck in this thinking.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have shown above that there is exactly one subgroup of order $p$. Let us call it $P$. Furthermore, this is a Sylow $p$-subgroup because $p$ is the largest power of $p$ which divides $|G|=pm$. Thus, by the third theorem all Sylow $p$-subgroups are conjugate. Consider $gPg^{-1}$. Show that this subgroup has order $p$, and so, it is a Sylow $p$-subgroup. But since there is only one such subgroup it follows that $gPg^{-1} = P$. Since this is true for all $p$ we conclude that $P$ is invariant under conjugation, so it is a normal subgroup.
 
Hi,
You asked for a different proof that doesn't use the Sylow theorems. Here is one. The idea of representing (finding a homomorphism) a group G on the cosets of a subgroup is worth remembering.

nx43sw.png