Normalisation of quantum states

In summary, the conversation discusses the normalization of a state with two components, and how this normalization may be affected when those components are not orthogonal. The conversation also touches on the use of ladder operators and the Gram-Schmidt process in this context.
  • #1
bayners123
31
0
Hi,

Just a little thing that's been puzzling me:

Consider a state

[tex] \mid \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid A \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid B \rangle[/tex]

This is normalised since [tex] [\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}]^2 + [\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}]^2 = 1 [/tex]

Now let A = B:

[tex] \mid \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid A \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid A \rangle = \frac{2}{\sqrt{2}} \mid A \rangle = {\sqrt{2}} \mid A \rangle[/tex]

This isn't normalised anymore! What happened?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A and B must be normalized and orthogonal for your normalization to work. A and A is obviously not orthogonal.
 
  • #3
You implicitly assumed <A|B> = 0 in your first expression.
 
  • #4
Ah ok.. The reason this came up is that I was looking at latter operators on paired states. So with 2 atoms in a 1,1 state you can get
[tex] \mid 2,2 \rangle = \mid 1,1 \rangle\mid 1,1 \rangle [/tex]
And then you can use ladder operators to go down:
[tex] J_-\mid 2,2 \rangle = (J_-\mid 1,1 \rangle)\mid 1,1 \rangle + \mid 1,1 \rangle(J_- \mid 1,1 \rangle) \\
\mid 2,1 \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid 1,0 \rangle\mid 1,1 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \mid 1,1 \rangle \mid 1,0 \rangle
[/tex]
Which is fine, but then the next one:
[tex]
\sqrt{6} \mid 2,0 \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{2} \mid 1,-1 \rangle\mid 1,1 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{2} \mid 1,0 \rangle\mid 1,0 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{2} \mid 1,0 \rangle \mid 1,0 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{2} \mid 1,0 \rangle \mid 1,-1 \rangle
[/tex]
is actually also fine now I look at it again.. Sorry for wasting your time!
 
  • #5

1. What is normalisation of a quantum state?

The normalisation of a quantum state refers to the process of ensuring that the total probability of all possible outcomes for a quantum system is equal to 1. This is necessary because quantum states are described by complex numbers, and the absolute value squared of these complex numbers give the probability of measuring a particular state.

2. Why is normalisation important in quantum mechanics?

Normalisation is important in quantum mechanics because it ensures that the total probability of all possible outcomes for a quantum system is equal to 1. This is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics and without it, the predictions and calculations of the theory would not hold true.

3. How is a quantum state normalised?

A quantum state is normalised by dividing each component of the state vector by the square root of the sum of the absolute value squared of all the components. In other words, each component is divided by the magnitude of the state vector.

4. What happens if a quantum state is not normalised?

If a quantum state is not normalised, it means that the total probability of all possible outcomes is not equal to 1. This can lead to incorrect predictions and calculations in quantum mechanics. In addition, it violates the fundamental principle of normalisation in quantum mechanics.

5. Is normalisation of quantum states always necessary?

Yes, normalisation of quantum states is always necessary in order to ensure the validity of predictions and calculations in quantum mechanics. It is a fundamental principle that must be followed in order to accurately describe and understand the behavior of quantum systems.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
611
Replies
9
Views
967
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
944
Replies
1
Views
528
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
779
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
845
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
574
Back
Top