Normalizing a wave function - how the integration is done?

Click For Summary
Normalization of a wave function involves integrating the probability density, given by the square of the wave function's magnitude, over a specified volume and setting the result equal to one. The integration process can yield different results depending on the chosen wave function; for example, a plane wave leads to a constant probability density, while a standing wave results in a non-constant density. When using a wave function like Ψ = Ψ₀ sin(ωt - kx), it is crucial to consider the integration limits and the physical realism of the wave function, as idealized plane waves cannot be normalized over infinite space. To make a wave function acceptable in quantum mechanics, it may need to be modified to ensure it approaches zero at infinity, leading to the concept of wave packets. Understanding these principles requires a solid grasp of quantum mechanics fundamentals.
71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
I have been searching for an anwser everywhere, but i can't seem to understand something. In this topic (you don't need to read it) i managed to find out that "we can calculate normalisation factor ##\Psi_0## of a wavefunction ##\Psi## if we integrate probability ##|\Psi|^2## over some volume and equate it to 1". Hence:

<br /> \int\limits_{V} |\Psi|^2 \, \textrm{d}V= 1<br />

Now how exactly do we integrate this? Please be specific, because in the post i linked to i got an anwser that the result of integration is

<br /> \int\limits_{V} |\Psi|^2 \, \textrm{d}V = |\psi_0|^2 V<br />

and i don't know how is this possible. Maybee my interpretation of this is wrong and this is why below i am supplying you with my interpretation.

My interpretation:
For the sake of clarity i will just choose some wave function for example ##\Psi = \Psi_0 \sin(\omega t - kx)##. I chose this as it is similar to an already known wave function of a sinusoidal wave ##A = A_0 \sin(\omega t - kx)## which i have been using allover wave physics. I don't know if i am allowed to choose the ##\Psi## like that because for now i don't know enough to know what i am alowed/not allowed to do in QM. If i understand this ##\Psi_0## in a vave function ##\Psi = \Psi_0 \sin(\omega t - kx)## is the normalisation factor i am seeking? (Please confirm this). So now i take an integral of the wavefunction and equate it to 1:

<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int \limits^{}_{V} \left|\Psi \right|^2 \, \textrm{d} V &amp;= 1\\<br /> \int \limits^{}_{V} \big|\Psi_0 \sin (\omega t - kx) \big|^2 \, \textrm{d} V &amp;= 1\\<br /> &amp;\dots<br /> \end{split}<br />

I get lost at the spot where i wrote down "##\dots##". I really don't know how to get ##|\psi_0|^2 V## as a result of integration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course the answer you get depends on what wavefunction you start with. If, as in the thread you quoted, you choose ψ = ψ0 expi(kx - ωt), this is a traveling plane wave. Its probability density is |ψ|2 = ψ*ψ = ψ02 = const, so the integral gives you ψ02 V.

If, on the other hand you choose ψ = ψ0 sin(kx - ωt), this is a standing wave. Its probability density is ψ02 sin2(kx - ωt) which is not constant, and you'll get a different integral.
 
Bill_K said:
Of course the answer you get depends on what wavefunction you start with.
Yes i understand this.
Bill_K said:
|ψ|2 = ψ02
THIS is what i still am not certain of. If i try to calculate ##|\Psi| ^2## using ##\Psi = \Psi_0 e^{i(\omega t - kx)}## i get this:

<br /> |\Psi|^2 = \left| \Psi_0 e^{i(\omega t - kx)} \right| ^2 = \overline{\Psi} \Psi = \underbrace{\Psi_0 e^{-i(\omega t - kx)}}_{conjugate} \Psi_0 e^{i(\omega t - kx)} = {\Psi_0}^2 \frac{\Psi_0 e^{i(\omega t - kx)}}{\Psi_0 e^{i(\omega t - kx)}} = \Psi_0^2<br />

Is my calculation legit? Please confirm. And please tell me how do i know that ##\Psi_0^2## is a constant and i should therefore integrate it as such?
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's correct. And a plane wave will have a constant amplitude, so ψ0 will be constant.
 
But how can i calculate integral for wave function ##\Psi = \Psi_0 \sin(\omega t - kx)##. Could i simplify this by stating that the wave is traveling in ##x## direction and only integrate over ##x## or should i use a triple ##\iiint## and integrate over ##x##, ##y## and ##z##? I need some advice on how to calculate this integral:

<br /> \int\limits_V \left| \Psi_0 \sin(\omega t - kx) \right|^2 \, \textrm{d} V<br />
 
A plane wave that extends to infinity in all directions cannot be normalized in the usual sense, i.e.

$$\int_{all space} {\Psi^* \Psi dx dy dz} = 1$$

(in three dimensions)

Such waves are not physically realistic. The amplitude of a real-world wave function has to drop off to zero as we go "far enough" away from the center of the system. This leads to the concept of wave packets.

Nevertheless, we often talk about plane waves as convenient idealizations or approximations over small regions of space.
 
jtbell said:
Such waves are not physically realistic. The amplitude of a real-world wave function has to drop off to zero as we go "far enough" away from the center of the system.

How could i then modify the wave function ##\Psi = \Psi_0 \sin(\omega t - kx)## to be acceptable for QM?
 
I think it would be best to go back and look at the fundamentals of QM, once you have, the answers to your questions will become obvious.
The answer to your question is complicated and i don't know where to start explaining.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K