Normalizing error of affine transformation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing the error of an affine transformation derived from a set of point pairs. The user highlights the challenge of measuring the error, defined as the Euclidean distance between the transformed points and their target locations. They suggest that, similar to Euclidean transformations, the error should be normalized based on the distance from the transformation center, which can be computed from the rotation matrix's eigenvector. The user seeks insights or methods for achieving this normalization in the context of affine transformations. The conversation emphasizes the need for a more representative measure of transformation accuracy.
zokos
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have the following problem. Suppose I have a set of n>3 point pairs ( (x,y)->(x',y') ). From this set I can create an overdetermined linear system and using for example least squares compute an affine transformation that when applied to (x,y) gives us (x',y') within an error.
So for example let's say that least squares method gave us an affine transformation (A,T) where A is a linear transformation and T a translation vector. This affine transformation when applied to (x,y) will map it to (x'',y'') that is different to (x',y'). That is:
[x'';y''] = A * [x;y] +T (the semicolon means different row)
now the error of the computed transformation is the euclidean distance between (x',y') and (x'',y''). Let's say this distance d. I have an intuition that this distance should be normalized with something to be more representative of the failure or success of the computed transformation, but I don't know what that should be.

This thought came to me when thinking the simpler case of an euclidean transformation consisting of a rotation R and translation T. In this case point correspondences that are further from the transformation center are expected to have greater error than point close to the center. So in this case I could maybe divide the error with the distance of (x,y) from the transformation center. This transformation center could be easily computed as an eigenvector of the rotation matrix.

Now in the more general affine case is there something similar to do?

Any comment,solution,link is really welcome,
many thx,
zokos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
850
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K