Normed Vector Space Homework: Prove No Inner-Product Norm

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the norm defined as ||f|| sup = max{|f(x)|, x ∈ [a,b]} for the vector space C[a,b] does not satisfy the parallelogram law, thereby confirming it is not an inner-product norm. Participants emphasize the importance of applying the properties of norms, such as the triangle inequality and the non-negativity condition. The conversation also clarifies that for continuous functions on a closed interval, the definitions of "sup" and "max" coincide, aiding in the proof process. Additionally, breaking down complex functions into real and imaginary parts is suggested for analyzing the parallelogram law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces, specifically C[a,b]
  • Familiarity with norm definitions and properties
  • Knowledge of the parallelogram law in the context of inner-product spaces
  • Basic concepts of complex-valued functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of norms in functional analysis
  • Learn how to prove the parallelogram law for inner-product spaces
  • Explore the relationship between suprema and maxima in closed intervals
  • Investigate the implications of breaking complex functions into real and imaginary components
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying functional analysis, as well as educators and anyone interested in the properties of norms and inner-product spaces.

poobar
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the vector space C[a,b] of all continuous complex-valued functions f(x), x \in [a,b]. Define a norm ||f|| sup = max{|f(x)|, x \in [a,b]}. (Math Note: technically we want to use sup instead of max but a physicists operational definition of max is the mathematial notion of sup).

a. Show that this is a norm.
b. Show that this norm does not satisfy the parallelogram law, ||x-y|| + ||x+y|| = 2||x||^{2} + 2||y||^{2}. Therefore, it cannot be an inner-product norm

Homework Equations



IF ||v|| = 0 then |v> = 0
||v1 + v2|| \leq ||v1|| + ||v2|| (triangle inequality)
||v|| \geq 0
||av|| = |a| ||v|| if a \in complex

The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no idea where to start on this. i tried to apply the rules of a norm, but i am very confused. please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you have "no idea how to start". You wrote out what is required for a norm. What happens if you put your specific definition of the norm into those?

If max(|f(x)|)= 0, what can you say about f(x)?
For any given x, |f(x)+ g(x)|\le |f(x)|+ |g(x)|.
max (a g(x)), for fixed a, is equal to a(max(g(x)).

By the way, because [a, b] is a closed interval, even the mathematical definitions of "sup" and "max" are the same.
 
ok, that makes sense. i guess the part i am confused about is how to go about proving that the definition fits all of the rules.

also, for the part about the parallelogram law, do i have to break f(x) into real and imaginary parts in oder to prove that it doesn't hold true for the rule? i feel like that's a dumb question, but this is part that is most confusing to me. since it is a complex valued function, this is the first thing that comes to mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K