Not so independent investigation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the announcement that President George W. Bush would personally lead an investigation into the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, raising concerns about the independence and effectiveness of such an inquiry. Participants express skepticism about the integrity of the investigation and discuss the implications of having the president oversee a probe into his own administration's actions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of Bush leading the investigation, suggesting it undermines its independence.
  • Others predict that opinions on the investigation will vary based on political affiliations, noting past inconsistencies in support for similar proposals.
  • A few participants express disbelief that such a decision could be made, indicating a lack of confidence in the president's judgment.
  • Concerns are raised that the investigation will absolve Bush and his administration of responsibility for the failures in response to the disaster.
  • Some suggest that an independent body, such as the Corps of Engineers or academic institutions, should conduct the investigation to ensure objectivity.
  • There are references to past awards given by Bush, such as the Medal of Freedom, which some participants believe reflect a pattern of rewarding incompetence.
  • Participants express frustration over the perceived acceptance of Bush's actions by some Americans, questioning the implications for democracy and accountability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism and concern regarding the investigation's integrity, but there is no consensus on the best approach to conducting the investigation or the implications of Bush's leadership role in it. Multiple competing views remain on the effectiveness and necessity of an independent investigation.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect assumptions about the political landscape and public opinion, which may not be universally held. The discussion includes references to specific events and figures that may not be fully explained within the thread.

  • #31
DM said:
It's pretty obvious that Bush publicly announced that he would conduct a PERSONAL investigation only to reassure Americans that he STILL (to the supporting half) holds power and credibility. It's crucial that he becomes the central person in this investigation for he also wishes to reinforce the idea that he's a responsible president.
:smile: :smile: If he wants to portray himself as responsible I have an idea...How about assuming responsibility!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Well Georgie's little ploy didn't work. Within the day his announcement to oversee a probe was criticized and other investigations are to take place. This Katrina disaster isn't giving him the camouflage that 9-11 did, and now his ratings are such that he is exposed to scrutiny. Perhaps what comes around goes around, eh?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
14K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K