Notation for Domain Variable Expressions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tomwilliam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    domains Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proper notation for expressing domain restrictions in mathematical equations, specifically for the equation x=1/((y-2)(y-3)). The participants agree that while the original expression "y<2 or 2 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of mathematical notation and inequalities
  • Familiarity with set theory concepts
  • Knowledge of open and closed intervals
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research standard set notation in mathematics
  • Learn about open and closed intervals in real analysis
  • Explore the implications of domain restrictions in algebraic functions
  • Study the use of union and intersection symbols in set theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone involved in algebra or real analysis who seeks to improve their understanding of domain variable expressions and proper notation.

tomwilliam
Messages
142
Reaction score
3
If you have an equation with a variable which isn't defined for a given value or values, how do you express this in proper notation? For example:
x=1/((y-2)(y-3))

Do I write simply " y<2 or 2<y<3 or 3<y" or is there a better way to express it?
Thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tomwilliam said:
If you have an equation with a variable which isn't defined for a given value or values, how do you express this in proper notation? For example:
x=1/((y-2)(y-3))

Do I write simply " y<2 or 2<y<3 or 3<y" or is there a better way to express it?
Thx
There exist no strictly better ways than the one you've chosen, but it is perhaps slightly more conventional to use standard set notation. your "or" is then replaced by the symbol for "union" (a "U"), and your (strict) inequalities are replaced by indicating the open sets the inequality indicates.
For example, we may write yours that "y" is an element of:
(-inf,2)U(2,3)U(3,inf)

Alternatively, we might write something like:
[tex]y\in\mathcal{R},y\neq{2},y\neq{3}[/tex]

Again, your own expression is perfectly fine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K