Notation question for Maxwell's Equations.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of specific equations from the wave equation involving the 4-potential in the context of electromagnetism, specifically Maxwell's equations. Participants are exploring the relationships between the magnetic field, electric field, and the 4-potential.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of using a 4-potential and how it relates to the equations for magnetic and electric fields. Questions arise about the role of the current density term, j^\mu, in the context of these equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationships between the fields and the 4-potential, noting the mathematical properties of divergence and curl. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the treatment of the j^\mu term and its implications in the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the source material being from Halzen Martin, which may imply specific constraints or assumptions relevant to the discussion. Additionally, the use of LaTeX for notation has been noted, indicating a focus on precise mathematical expressions.

neutrino33
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know I may be in the wrong place, but I think I'll get a quicker and better response here. My question is:

How do
[tex]\nabla \cdot \textbf{B} = 0[/tex]
and
[tex]\nabla \times \textbf{E} + \frac{\partial \textbf{B}}{\partial t} = 0[/tex]
derive from
[tex]\Box^2 A^\mu -\partial^\mu(\partial_\nu A^\nu) = j^\mu[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations you are thinking of are implicit in the fact that you are using a 4-potential.

Because

[tex]B = \nabla x A[/tex]

then

[tex]\nabla \cdot B = \nabla \cdot \nabla x A[/tex]

Because the divergence of a curl is 0 (or there is no boundary of a boundary, or the exterior derivative is nilpotent, or whatever your favorite math expression is)

Using

[tex]E = -\nabla A^0 -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} A[/tex]

You can take the curl to get the standard

[tex]\nabla x E = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} B[/tex]
 
del.B=0,is nonexistence of magnetic monopole, and the second equation is ampere's law where the time varying magnetic field depends on circulation of electric field.This all equation can be found by using wave equation.
 
ParticleGrl said:
The equations you are thinking of are implicit in the fact that you are using a 4-potential.

Because

[tex]B = \nabla x A[/tex]

then

[tex]\nabla \cdot B = \nabla \cdot \nabla x A[/tex]

Because the divergence of a curl is 0 (or there is no boundary of a boundary, or the exterior derivative is nilpotent, or whatever your favorite math expression is)

Using

[tex]E = -\nabla A^0 -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} A[/tex]

You can take the curl to get the standard

[tex]\nabla x E = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} B[/tex]

I buy that. I don't see, however, what happens to the [tex]j^\mu[/tex].
 
It would be useful to know that the LaTex code for vector/cross product would be: [itex]\times[/itex] [ itex] \times [/itex].
 
This is what I'm working on. It is from Halzen Martin.
 

Attachments

  • HM.jpg
    HM.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 543

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K