Notation (v*gradient operator)v in Navier-Stokes

Click For Summary
The notation "(v * gradient operator)v" in the context of Navier-Stokes refers to the operation of the velocity vector field interacting with the gradient operator, specifically expressed as (v · ∇)v. This operation can be expanded to show how each component of the velocity vector affects the flow, resulting in a detailed expression involving partial derivatives of the velocity components. The gradient operator (∇) is clarified as only applying to scalar functions, while the divergence (∇·v) and curl (∇×v) are also defined in relation to vector fields. Additionally, the discussion touches on the expansion of expressions like (y + d/dx)y, which can be interpreted as y plus its derivative. Understanding these notations is crucial for grasping the mathematical framework of fluid dynamics.
TylerH
Messages
729
Reaction score
0
Notation "(v*gradient operator)v" in Navier-Stokes

What does \left( \textbf{v} \cdot \nabla \right) \textbf{v} mean, assuming knowledge of the gradient operator? And, specifically, how would that be expanded? In general, I'm ignorant of the notation \left( f \left( y, \frac{d}{dx}, \frac{d^2}{dx^2}, \ldots \right) y \right) where, for example, f \left( y, \frac{d}{dx}, \frac{d^2}{dx^2}, \ldots \right) could be y + \frac{d}{dx}.

ec8991a09ac20811fda72211cb486792.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That is, by the way, the "del" or "nabla" operator. It is specifically only \nabla f(x,y,z, with f a scalar valued function, that is the "gradient". \nabla\cdot \vec{v} is the "gradient" or grad \vec{v} and \nabla\times\vec{v} is the curl \vec{v}.

In any case
\vec{v}\cdot\nabla= v_x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial }{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial }{\partial z}
so that
\vec{v}\cdot\nabla \vec{v}= \left(v_x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial }{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\right)v_x\vec{i}+ \left(v_x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial }{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\right)v_y\vec{j}+ \left(v_x\frac{\partial }{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial }{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\right)v_z\vec{k}
= \left(v_x\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\right)\vec{i}+ \left(v_x\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z}\right)\vec{j}+ \left(v_x\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x}+ v_y\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}+ v_z\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right)\vec{k}
 


Oh, I didn't understand it as well as I thought I did. Thanks.

Just wondering, is \left( y + \frac{d}{dx} \right)y meaningless, or can it be expanded? If it can, what is it?

Thanks for your time.
 


it can be expanded as:
<br /> y+\frac{dy}{dx}<br />
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
849
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K