Nuclear charge and atomic orbitals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Using hydrogen-like orbitals for atoms beyond hydrogen and helium is highly discouraged due to inaccuracies in probability density calculations. While the number of nodes remains consistent for one-electron atoms, the scaling factor for radius (##r##) varies with atomic number (##Z##) and nucleus mass. For accurate orbital approximations, quantum chemistry practitioners should utilize generally contracted Gaussian basis sets, such as the ANO-RCC sets, which provide reliable results. Smaller Gaussian sets may also suffice, but STO basis sets should be avoided entirely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrogen-like orbitals
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Gaussian basis sets in quantum chemistry
  • Concept of nodes in atomic orbitals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ANO-RCC basis sets for quantum chemistry applications
  • Learn about the limitations of STO basis sets in computational chemistry
  • Explore the effects of electron-electron interactions on atomic orbitals
  • Study the scaling factors for radius in multi-electron atoms
USEFUL FOR

Quantum chemists, physicists, and students studying atomic structure who require accurate modeling of atomic orbitals and their properties.

kthejohnster
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If I use hydrogen-like orbitals for other atoms, how are the number of nodes and probability density affected?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you are considering one-electron atoms (or negelcting electron-electron interactions), then the only difference is in a scaling factor for ##r## that depends on ##Z##. Note that this scaling factor also depends on the mass of the nucleus (if you are not considering an infinitely heavy nucleus).
 
For other atoms (more than one electron), the number of nodes of the H-like orbitals should be fine, but the probability density would be just wrong. Using hydrogen-like orbitals for anything else than hydrogen and helium is highly NOT recommended! As least not if you care about the results you get.

If you need a proper approximation of the orbitals, you can use the AO functions of a generally contracted Gaussian basis set from quantum chemistry. For example, the ANO-RCC sets should be very accurate and useful for such a purpose. Depending on your case, much smaller Gaussian sets might also do the trick. (but stay away from STO-anything sets--these are even worse than using H-orbitals).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K