Nuclear Decay Scheme: Learn the Basics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the amount of molybdenum (99Mo) needed to produce technetium-99m (99mTc) with a specific activity. Participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between the two forms of technetium, 99mTc and 99Tc, as the question lacks clarity. There is a consensus that the calculation should focus on the production of 20 MBq of 99mTc rather than 20 MBq of 99Tc. Additionally, the yield of 85% for 99mTc is noted as a factor that must be considered in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise terminology and understanding in nuclear decay equations.
Benlaww
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Using a simplified decay scheme for the generator (shown in attempt of solution box) and assuming that initially only 99Mo is present, the number of 99Tc atoms N_Tc as a
function of time t is given by:
N_Tc(t) = (landa_Mo/(landa_Tc - landa_Mo))*N_Mo(0)*(e^(-landa_Mo*t) - e^(-landa_Tc*t))

Calculate the minimum activity of 99Mo required to produce 20 MBq of 99Tc at t
= 6 hours. State clearly any assumptions you make
Relevant Equations
A=landa*N
tc.JPG
I'm not too sure where to start, do I differentiate the equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benlaww said:
I'm not too sure where to start, do I differentiate the equation?
You can just calculate how much Tc99m has an acitivity of 30 Bq, and then use the equation to calculate how much Mo you need six hours earlier. The only thing not accounted for in the equation is the yield of 85% Tc99m.
I'm sure you can ignore the decay of the ordinary Tc99,
 
  • Like
Likes Benlaww and Steve4Physics
There's a mistake/ambiguity in the question which could cause confusion. There are 2 different forms of technetium referred to in this question but the question doesn't distinguish between them.

99Mo decays either to 99mTc (the metastable form) or to 99Tc.

Neither the diagram nor the question mention 99mTc but it appears you are actually being asked how many atoms of 99Mo were needed to produce 20MBq of 99mTc (not 20MBq of 99Tc).

I agree with @willem2's approach, except that I presume
"how much Tc99m has an acitivity of 30 Bq"
should really be
"how many atoms of Tc99m have an acitivity of 20MBq ".

Also, for information, the English-equivalent spelling of the Greek lettter ##\lambda## is ‘lambda’. It is pronounced ‘lam-da’. (Not to be confused with the dance the 'lambada' as some of my students did many years ago!).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top