Nuclear Interactions: Inelastic and elastic scattering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on neutron interactions in nuclear physics, specifically elastic and inelastic scattering scenarios involving various target nuclei. The instructor's analysis of 10-MeV neutrons interacting with lead suggests that inelastic scattering is more probable due to the excess energy available in the compound nucleus. The participant challenges the instructor's calculation of excess energy, asserting that their own calculation yields approximately 22 MeV using mass excess values for lead isotopes. The conversation highlights the complexities of neutron ejection versus elastic scattering and gamma decay in nuclear interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron interactions in nuclear physics
  • Familiarity with elastic and inelastic scattering concepts
  • Knowledge of mass excess calculations in nuclear reactions
  • Basic principles of compound nucleus formation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study neutron interaction types in detail, focusing on elastic and inelastic scattering
  • Learn about mass excess calculations using the formula: ΔQ = (m_A+m_a-m_b-m_B)c²
  • Research the binding energy per nucleon for various isotopes
  • Explore the role of compound nuclei in neutron-induced reactions
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in nuclear physics, medical physicists, and researchers interested in neutron interactions and nuclear reaction mechanisms.

physmurf
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I originally posted this in the homework section until I realized the homework section only covers through undergraduate courses. The course I am currently in is a graduate level Medical Physics course. So if you don't mind, here is the thread I posted in the homework section.

I am preparing for a Nuclear Physics test. One of the homework problems asks the following: Choose the proper neutron interaction type for each of the following scenarios and explain why. Interaction types: elastic, inelastic, (n,\gamma),(n,2n),(n,\alpha).

A. 10-MeV neutrons interacting with lead.
B. Thermal neutrons interacting with gold.
C. 1-MeV neutrons interacting with hydrogen in water.
D. Thermal Neutrons interacting with boron-10.
E. 6-MeV neutrons interacting with beryllium.



Instructors answer to part A: Both elastic and inelastic scattering are possible, but inelastic is more probable; This is because there is a large amount of "excess" energy (~17.5 Mev) available in the compound nucleus, and it takes little time (<10^{-14} sec) for a neutron to gain enough energy (~7 MeV to escape. This most likely would leave the residual nucleus at an excited state as there are so many low-lying excited states available in a Pb nucleus.

First off, I am unsure of where he gets the 17.5 MeV. Every calculation I use gives an excess energy of about 22 MeV. This was obtained using the following formula:
I used a table in the back of my book which gives the mass excess for different nuclei: I decided to use ^{208}Pb for the target nucleus since it is the most abundant form of Lead.

_\Delta Q = (m_A+m_a-m_b-m_B)c^2

Mass excesses are:
^{208}Pb: -23364 _\muu
Neutron: 8665 _\muu
^{209}Pb: -18926 _\muu

This gave me a result close to 12 MeV. When this is added to 10 Mev I get approximately 22 Mev.

In any event, even if this is 22 MeV, what will determine weather or not a Neutron is ejected from the compound nucleus as opposed to just some elastic scattering or \gamma gamma decay? This is perhaps my biggest "hang up" with this. What do any of you think?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photons are generally unlikely if there is a process that happens via the strong interaction.

The 17.5 MeV might be an approximation from the average binding energy per nucleon, which is roughly 7.5 MeV for heavy nuclei (+10 for the incoming neutron). That doesn't take into account specific nuclides and even small variations in the binding energy per nucleon can lead to large differences in the overall binding energy, so this is a very poor approximation method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K