Nuclear plant refueling and temporary workers

  • Thread starter Thread starter meb66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Plant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the refueling process at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant and the influx of temporary workers involved in this activity. It highlights the last refueling outage in fall 2009, during which thousands of temporary workers were present due to major installations, such as new steam generators. Concerns were raised about the potential for these workers to inadvertently transport radioactive materials off-site, despite stringent contamination checks, including whole-body scans for those entering and exiting restricted areas. The discussion emphasizes the heightened security measures post-9/11 and the effectiveness of monitoring systems in place to ensure community safety.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear plant operations and refueling processes
  • Knowledge of contamination control measures in nuclear facilities
  • Familiarity with radiation safety protocols and monitoring equipment
  • Awareness of historical incidents related to nuclear safety, such as the Stanley Watras case
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest radiation monitoring technologies used in nuclear facilities
  • Explore the protocols for worker decontamination in nuclear power plants
  • Investigate the impact of temporary workers on nuclear plant safety and community health
  • Learn about the regulations governing nuclear plant security post-9/11
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear safety professionals, environmental health researchers, community safety advocates, and anyone interested in the operational protocols of nuclear power plants and their impact on local communities.

meb66
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I live and work approximately ten miles from the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant. As many of you probably know, this facility (and I assume others around the country) is periodically shut down for refueling. From what I understand, hundreds of temporary workers are brought into assist with this activity.

I believe the last refueling outage at TMI was back in fall 2009. Literally thousands of temp workers arrived for that one due to some other major work (installation of new steam generators. etc) that was being done at the time. I assume that many of these workers stayed at local hotels, possibly rented cars, ate at local restaurants, etc. during their time in the area.

My question has to do with how closely a small army of workers like this is checked for potential contamination before they leave a plant site everyday. In other words, what is the chance that any of these workers could inadvertently transport radioactive particles/material off-site (into the community) via their clothing, shoes, etc?

Thanks for taking the time to read
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
meb66 said:
I live and work approximately ten miles from the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant. As many of you probably know, this facility (and I assume others around the country) is periodically shut down for refueling. From what I understand, hundreds of temporary workers are brought into assist with this activity.

I believe the last refueling outage at TMI was back in fall 2009. Literally thousands of temp workers arrived for that one due to some other major work (installation of new steam generators. etc) that was being done at the time. I assume that many of these workers stayed at local hotels, possibly rented cars, ate at local restaurants, etc. during their time in the area.

My question has to do with how closely a small army of workers like this is checked for potential contamination before they leave a plant site everyday. In other words, what is the chance that any of these workers could inadvertently transport radioactive particles/material off-site (into the community) via their clothing, shoes, etc?

Thanks for taking the time to read
Workers going into certain areas of the plant - particularly containment are scanned - whole body in and out. Whenever I go into highly restricted areas - I've been scanned in and out. The detectors are pretty sensitive.

That is even more so true today than in the past. Since 9/11 security is much tighter. The utility has an interest to make sure that nothing unwanted gets in or out.
 
meb66 said:
I live and work approximately ten miles from the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant. As many of you probably know, this facility (and I assume others around the country) is periodically shut down for refueling. From what I understand, hundreds of temporary workers are brought into assist with this activity.

I believe the last refueling outage at TMI was back in fall 2009. Literally thousands of temp workers arrived for that one due to some other major work (installation of new steam generators. etc) that was being done at the time. I assume that many of these workers stayed at local hotels, possibly rented cars, ate at local restaurants, etc. during their time in the area.

My question has to do with how closely a small army of workers like this is checked for potential contamination before they leave a plant site everyday. In other words, what is the chance that any of these workers could inadvertently transport radioactive particles/material off-site (into the community) via their clothing, shoes, etc?

Thanks for taking the time to read

This link might help...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_decontamination
 
Thanks for the info, guys

Can get a little scary thinking about this given the large number of people going in and out of these plants daily ... and the fact that even tiny amounts of some radioactive substances (particularly if inhaled from what I've read) can potentially be very dangerous.
 
You should remember that everything around a nuclear power plant is very well monitored for the presence of radioactive contamination, with very sensitive instruments.

Look up the case of Stanley Watras, for an interesting demonstration of the implications of this.

As another example, if you went into a nuclear power plant and you have recently had a nuclear medicine procedure, you would probably set off all those monitors too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
Replies
64
Views
18K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K