Nuclear plant refueling and temporary workers

  • Thread starter Thread starter meb66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Plant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the safety protocols for temporary workers at nuclear plants during refueling outages, specifically regarding the potential for contamination and the measures in place to prevent radioactive materials from being transported off-site. The scope includes concerns about health risks, monitoring practices, and community safety related to nuclear energy facilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the possibility of temporary workers inadvertently transporting radioactive particles off-site via their clothing and shoes.
  • Another participant notes that workers entering certain areas of the plant are scanned for contamination, indicating that security measures have become stricter since 9/11.
  • A third participant mentions the potential dangers of even tiny amounts of radioactive substances, particularly if inhaled, highlighting the anxiety surrounding the influx of workers.
  • One participant reassures that the area around nuclear power plants is well monitored for radioactive contamination using sensitive instruments.
  • Another participant references the case of Stanley Watras as an example of the implications of contamination monitoring.
  • There is a mention that individuals who have undergone nuclear medicine procedures may trigger contamination monitors when entering a nuclear facility.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of concern regarding contamination risks and the effectiveness of monitoring protocols. While some emphasize the strict measures in place, others remain apprehensive about the potential health risks associated with temporary workers at nuclear plants. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the adequacy of safety measures.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully explored the specific protocols for monitoring workers or the exact procedures for decontamination, leaving some assumptions unaddressed. The discussion also lacks detailed information on the effectiveness of current safety measures and the historical context of contamination incidents.

meb66
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I live and work approximately ten miles from the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant. As many of you probably know, this facility (and I assume others around the country) is periodically shut down for refueling. From what I understand, hundreds of temporary workers are brought into assist with this activity.

I believe the last refueling outage at TMI was back in fall 2009. Literally thousands of temp workers arrived for that one due to some other major work (installation of new steam generators. etc) that was being done at the time. I assume that many of these workers stayed at local hotels, possibly rented cars, ate at local restaurants, etc. during their time in the area.

My question has to do with how closely a small army of workers like this is checked for potential contamination before they leave a plant site everyday. In other words, what is the chance that any of these workers could inadvertently transport radioactive particles/material off-site (into the community) via their clothing, shoes, etc?

Thanks for taking the time to read
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
meb66 said:
I live and work approximately ten miles from the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant. As many of you probably know, this facility (and I assume others around the country) is periodically shut down for refueling. From what I understand, hundreds of temporary workers are brought into assist with this activity.

I believe the last refueling outage at TMI was back in fall 2009. Literally thousands of temp workers arrived for that one due to some other major work (installation of new steam generators. etc) that was being done at the time. I assume that many of these workers stayed at local hotels, possibly rented cars, ate at local restaurants, etc. during their time in the area.

My question has to do with how closely a small army of workers like this is checked for potential contamination before they leave a plant site everyday. In other words, what is the chance that any of these workers could inadvertently transport radioactive particles/material off-site (into the community) via their clothing, shoes, etc?

Thanks for taking the time to read
Workers going into certain areas of the plant - particularly containment are scanned - whole body in and out. Whenever I go into highly restricted areas - I've been scanned in and out. The detectors are pretty sensitive.

That is even more so true today than in the past. Since 9/11 security is much tighter. The utility has an interest to make sure that nothing unwanted gets in or out.
 
meb66 said:
I live and work approximately ten miles from the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear plant. As many of you probably know, this facility (and I assume others around the country) is periodically shut down for refueling. From what I understand, hundreds of temporary workers are brought into assist with this activity.

I believe the last refueling outage at TMI was back in fall 2009. Literally thousands of temp workers arrived for that one due to some other major work (installation of new steam generators. etc) that was being done at the time. I assume that many of these workers stayed at local hotels, possibly rented cars, ate at local restaurants, etc. during their time in the area.

My question has to do with how closely a small army of workers like this is checked for potential contamination before they leave a plant site everyday. In other words, what is the chance that any of these workers could inadvertently transport radioactive particles/material off-site (into the community) via their clothing, shoes, etc?

Thanks for taking the time to read

This link might help...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_decontamination
 
Thanks for the info, guys

Can get a little scary thinking about this given the large number of people going in and out of these plants daily ... and the fact that even tiny amounts of some radioactive substances (particularly if inhaled from what I've read) can potentially be very dangerous.
 
You should remember that everything around a nuclear power plant is very well monitored for the presence of radioactive contamination, with very sensitive instruments.

Look up the case of Stanley Watras, for an interesting demonstration of the implications of this.

As another example, if you went into a nuclear power plant and you have recently had a nuclear medicine procedure, you would probably set off all those monitors too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
Replies
64
Views
18K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K