Nuclear statistical equilibrium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "nuclear statistical equilibrium," particularly in the context of nuclear physics and its applications to neutron stars and other astrophysical phenomena. Participants seek to clarify the meaning and implications of this term, exploring its relationship to thermodynamic equilibrium and the equation of state (EoS).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the term "nuclear statistical equilibrium," noting its frequent use without a clear explanation.
  • Another participant, who works in nuclear physics, admits unfamiliarity with the term and suggests it may relate to statistical hadronization models in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
  • A reference to a specific paper is provided, which discusses dense nuclear matter in thermal equilibrium, particularly in the context of neutron stars.
  • Participants discuss the importance of the equation of state (EoS) for understanding neutron stars, linking it to the concept of nuclear statistical equilibrium.
  • There is a query about whether "nuclear statistical equilibrium" implies that reactions are in equilibrium and how it differs from thermodynamic equilibrium.
  • One participant explains that nuclear equilibrium is analogous to thermodynamic equilibrium, highlighting the role of chemical potentials in beta-stable matter.
  • Further elaboration on the process of deriving the EoS from nuclear force models is presented, emphasizing the need for experimental data.
  • Links to introductory resources on nuclear astrophysics are shared, suggesting further reading for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the term "nuclear statistical equilibrium," and while some provide insights and references, there is no consensus on a definitive explanation or understanding of the term.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the topic, including the dependence on definitions and the need for further research in nuclear astrophysics to fully grasp the implications of nuclear statistical equilibrium.

Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18
Sorry, I have never found what does it mean Nuclear statistical equilibrium. It is used in any text but exact explanation nowhere.
Please explain a physical meaning of it.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hm, although working in nuclear physics, I've never heard the expression "nuclear statistical equilibrium". Do you have a concrete reference, where the term is used? There is a statistical hadronization model in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Maybe you are referring to that?
 
vanhees71 said:
Hm, although working in nuclear physics, I've never heard the expression "nuclear statistical equilibrium". Do you have a concrete reference, where the term is used? There is a statistical hadronization model in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Maybe you are referring to that?
I deal with this paper... http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991NuPhA.535..331L
I don't know if is possible to access online, but... This is stated in the introduction...for example
"
upload_2017-10-4_16-51-39.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-10-4_16-51-24.png
    upload_2017-10-4_16-51-24.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 697
I see. This paper is about dense (and not too hot) nuclear matter in thermal equilibrium as it occurs in neutron stars. To understand neutron stars you need to know the equation of state, i.e., the relation between pressure and energy density. That's what this paper is about.

Note that there has been a lot of more research about this still very interesting issue!
 
vanhees71 said:
I see. This paper is about dense (and not too hot) nuclear matter in thermal equilibrium as it occurs in neutron stars. To understand neutron stars you need to know the equation of state, i.e., the relation between pressure and energy density. That's what this paper is about.

Note that there has been a lot of more research about this still very interesting issue!
Oki I know it is about EoS in neutron star. But I'm not sure how to explain "nuclear statistical equilibrium". Does it mean that the reactions are in equilibrium? Why statistical. I understand thermodynamical equilibrium. What is the difference?
 
Hello

Nuclear equilibrium means the same as in thermodynamics (thermodynamics for chemists, because particles can decay or scape/dissapear as neutrinos).

So, in a neutron star (beta-stable matter) you have
mu_n = mu_p + m_e

Inside a nucleus (beta-stable) you have
mu_n = mu_p (i
f it is not beta-stable, the chemical potentials will be different and it will try to decay to beta-stability)

In white dwarfs, electrons keep the pressure and nuclei the mass. If you want to compute the partition function of electrons you can do it normally, taking into account the electrons are relativistic.

The EoS is just the next step (application in astrophysics) of the research in theoretical models of nuclear force. As far as I know, the flow is something like:
-Model of nuclear force interaction (effective forces)
-Refine the model with experimental data (3000 isotopes sounds good, but not enough)
-Derive EoS
-Astrophysical part

You can find more information about the nuclear statistical equilibrium in books about "nuclear astrophysics", in the section about compact objects. Sorry, at this moment I don't remember any author/title.

Regards,
ORF
 
vanhees71 said:
Here's a good intro by my nuclear-astrophysics colleagues here at Goethe University Frankfurt:

http://inspirehep.net/record/685336
Very nice indeed!
Thank you :)

Greetings!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K