gianeshwar
- 225
- 14
Friends!
Is there anything wrong in the statement"A null matrix is idempotent".
Is there anything wrong in the statement"A null matrix is idempotent".
The discussion revolves around the concept of idempotent matrices, specifically whether a null matrix qualifies as idempotent. Participants explore definitions and implications related to idempotency in the context of matrix algebra.
Participants generally agree on the definition of idempotent matrices, but there is disagreement regarding the status of the null matrix and the implications of matrix dimensions on idempotency. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of the statements made.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of idempotency and the conditions under which certain matrices are considered. The mathematical notation used by some participants is also noted as a point of confusion.
This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners of linear algebra, particularly those interested in matrix properties and idempotency.
What do you think? How is the term "idempotent" defined?gianeshwar said:Friends!
Is there anything wrong in the statement"A null matrix is idempotent".
Any square zero matrix A is idempotent, since A2 = A. So, in regard to your question in the first post, not all zero matrices are idempotent, since A2 might not be defined. For example,gianeshwar said:A square equal A. So if A is zero matrix then it satsfies this condition.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Writing an equation would make it clearer.gianeshwar said:Thank You.Doubt had arisen while showing B square not equal to I to be not always true when given B equal I minus A and A is idempotent.
Like I said in my previous post, this is easy to do.gianeshwar said:I needed to show that( B squarenot equai to I) is not always true.
You're welcome!gianeshwar said:Thank You Mark44 for the valuable help and suggestions!