Number of C-14 atoms in old piece of wood

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmoh111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Wood
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the number of Carbon-14 (C-14) atoms in an ancient wood specimen, specifically determining the quantities in 9474 B.C. and 1986 B.C. using the decay formula N(t) = N(0)exp^(-lambda*t). The decay constant (lambda) for C-14 is established as 0.000121 yr-1, leading to the conclusion that the specimen contained approximately 4 x 1012 C-14 atoms in 9474 B.C. and 1.6 x 1012 atoms in 1986 B.C. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding half-lives in radioactive decay calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with the decay formula N(t) = N(0)exp^(-lambda*t)
  • Knowledge of natural logarithms and their application in decay calculations
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for solving exponential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the half-life concept in various radioactive isotopes
  • Learn about the calculation of decay constants for different isotopes
  • Explore advanced topics in radiocarbon dating techniques
  • Investigate the implications of C-14 dating in archaeology and geology
USEFUL FOR

Students in chemistry or physics, researchers in archaeology, and professionals involved in radiocarbon dating will benefit from this discussion.

kmoh111
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working a homework problem that states:

A very old specimen of wood contained 1012 atoms of 14C in 1986.
• How many 14C atoms did it contain in the year 9474 B.C.?
• How many 14C atoms did it contain in 1986 B.C.?



Homework Equations



N(t) = N(0)exp^(-lambda*t)


The Attempt at a Solution



For C-14, lambda = ln2/T1/2 = 0693/5730 yrs = .000121 yr-1

Since we do not know N0, I took the ratio of C-14 atoms in 1986 (A.D.) to C-14 atoms in 9474 B.C.:

Let t1 reflect the time from t0 to 1986.
Let t2 reflect the time from t0 to 9474 B.C.
then the ratio of N(t1)/N(t2) is:

N0 * e-lambda*t1
-----------------------------------------------------
N0 * e-lambda*t2

N0 cancels and we know that N(t1) = 1012 atoms.

Solving for N(t2) gives us:

1012
----------------------------------------------------
e-lambda(t2-t1)

We know that the difference t2 - t1 is equal to 1986 + 9474 = 11460 yrs. Plugging the numbers and solving for N(T2), gives us

1012
----------------------------
e(-0.693(11460/5730))

N(t2) = 4 x 1012 ===> number of C-14 atoms in 9474 B.C.

Is this the correct approach? I used the approach for the second part of the question for number of C-14 atoms in 1986 B.C.. I got 1.6 x 1012 atoms.

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well...*technically* [tex]N(t1) = N_0 * e^{-\lambda*t1}[/tex], so you shouldn't have canceled out the N0, although it does not affect your final answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perhaps an easier approach would be to note that the time elapsed, 11,460 years, is about 2 half-lives, 2.01 to be precise. What fraction of the original sample is left after 2 half-lives have gone by? If you know the fraction remaining, you can easily find the original amount.

In general, I find it easier to answer this kind of problem using the half-life as a unit of time because the fraction remaining after n half-lives is

f = 2-n.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K