Calculating Carbon Decay: Kinetic Energy, Mass, and Activity

  • Thread starter Thread starter theleftlane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Decay
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of carbon decay, specifically focusing on the properties of carbon-14, its decay process, and the implications for human exposure to radiation. The original poster presents a series of questions related to the decay scheme, kinetic energy released, and the activity of carbon-14 in the human body.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the decay scheme of carbon-14 and discuss the kinetic energy released during the decay process. There are attempts to calculate the amount of carbon in a human body and the associated decay rates. Some participants question the necessary information for calculating kinetic energy and clarify the interpretation of decay rates in terms of grams versus atoms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing hints and clarifications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of decay rates and the significance of the carbon-14 fraction in the body. Multiple interpretations of the calculations are being explored, particularly concerning the decay activity and the mass of carbon-14.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the distinction between carbon-14 and the more abundant carbon-12 in the body. The discussion also highlights the need for specific values, such as the mass of nitrogen produced in the decay process, and the implications of using Bq as a unit of decay rate.

theleftlane
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The radiocarbon in our bodies is one of the naturally occurring sources of radiation. Let's see how large a dose we receive. 14C decays via Beta- emission, and 18% of body mass is Carbon.

A) Write out the decay scheme of carbon-14 and show the end product. (A neutrino is also produced.) I got this correct: 146C--> e- + 147N + ve

B) Neglecting the effects of the neutrino, how much kinetic energy (in MeV) is released per decay? The atomic mass of C-14 is 14.003242 mu.
I honestly don't know how to go about this one at all. I've reread the section this problem comes from and I don't even see a formula that could begin to solve this.

C) How many grams of carbon are there in a 77.0 kg person?
I got this correct. I multiplied 77000g * .18 which =13900g

D) How many decays per second does this carbon produce? (Hint: Assume activity of 14C is about 0.255 Bq per gram of carbon.)
I've tried this multiple different ways now. For the most part I've started by taking 13900g/14*6.022*1023 which should give me the N and then I've multiplied that by .255. The equation I used was -lambda*N=deltaN/deltat. As I am looking for decays per second (deltaN/deltat) I don't know how else to go about this.

Homework Equations


deltaN/deltat=-lambda*N
1Bq=1decay/s
N=N0*e-lambda*t
T1/2=ln/2

The Attempt at a Solution


Shown above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
B - you need either the mass of 14N, or you need to just lookup the energy of this decay step

D - the decay is given in Bq per gram of carbon, not per atom
 
Thanks a bunch! I'll work on it!
 
D is much simpler than you think
"Assume activity of 14C is about 0.255 Bq per gram of carbon"
means there are 0.255 decays per gram of carbon / second - you have worked out how much carbon is in the body, and you want the total decays per second!
 
Don't forget that most of the carbon in your body is C-12. Only a small fraction (which you can look up) is C-14.
 
phyzguy said:
Don't forget that most of the carbon in your body is C-12. Only a small fraction (which you can look up) is C-14.

I think that is taken into account in the decay rate given
The half life of C14 is around 5500yr, so 1.7E11 seconds and 10E23 atoms would give a lot more than 0.255Bq if it was just for the C14
 
You're right. Sorry.
 
phyzguy said:
You're right. Sorry.
That was my first answer as well before I ran the numbers!
Especially because I got Bq mixed up with the Curie which is a lot larger.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K