[number theory] product of co primes congruent to 1 (mod m)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that the product of integers coprime to a given integer \( m \) is congruent to either 1 or -1 modulo \( m \). This relates to concepts in number theory, particularly Euler's theorem and properties of coprime integers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relevance of Euler's theorem and Wilson's theorem, considering how these might apply to the problem. There is an exploration of whether a proof similar to Wilson's theorem can be adapted for non-prime \( m \). Questions arise about the uniqueness of pairs of coprime integers and their properties under multiplication modulo \( m \).

Discussion Status

The discussion is actively exploring potential approaches to adapt known theorems to the current problem. Participants are questioning the assumptions and definitions related to coprime integers and their behavior under multiplication. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of requirement for \( m \) to be prime, which adds complexity to the problem. There is also uncertainty regarding the uniqueness of pairs of integers that are coprime to \( m \) and how they relate to the proof structure.

RossH
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let b1 through b_phi(m) be integers between 1 and m that are coprime to m. Let B be the product of these integers. Show that B must be congruent to 1 or -1 (mod m)

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I know that the quantity B appears during the proof of Euler's formula. That is, that a^phi(m) is congruent to 1 (mod m). So I probably have to work from there somehow. I have looked at Wilson's theorem, Euler's theorem, and Fermat's little Theorem. I'm not really sure where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you apply a proof which is similar to the proof of Wilson's theorem?
 
micromass said:
Can't you apply a proof which is similar to the proof of Wilson's theorem?

There is no requirement that m be a prime number. That's where I'm confused.
 
Allright, can you write the proof to Wilson's theorem here?? Then we can see if the proof is adaptable or not... (in fact: this theorem is a generalization of Wilson's theorem for non-primes, so I suspect that an analogous proof should do)
 
micromass said:
Allright, can you write the proof to Wilson's theorem here?? Then we can see if the proof is adaptable or not... (in fact: this theorem is a generalization of Wilson's theorem for non-primes, so I suspect that an analogous proof should do)

Okay, this is how I understand the proof:

To be proved: n>1 is prime iff (n-1)! is congruent to -1 (mod n)
This must be true for 2.
For all integers n>2 in m there exists b in m such that ab is congruent to 1 (mod n).
This b is unique (mod n) [I'm not sure why] and because n is prime, a is congruent to b iff a is 1 or n-1.

So it seems to me that this means that the numbers can be grouped into pairs, where each one will have a pair (b). a*b will always be congruent to 1 based on the number of pairs because n must be odd. No a will have the same pair so this modulus can be raised to an even power, to get 1 [I'm not quite sure why this works].

At least, this is my cursory understanding of the proof.
 
Good, now we're going to try to adapt this proof so that it works in this case.

Take b_1,...,b_{\phi(m)} the integers coprime to m. Our goal is to group them in pairs so that they cancel out.

Try to show the following: if b is coprime to m, then there is a unique a such that ab=1 (mod m). Furthermore, a is also coprime to m.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K