Number Theory Questions: Proving p and x2 Congruencies

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around number theory, specifically focusing on proving congruencies related to prime divisors and quadratic residues. The original poster presents two questions that involve properties of integers and primes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for proving the form of prime divisors in the first question and discuss potential approaches for the second question, including hints about rearranging terms and using Wilson's Theorem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress on the first question, while others express difficulty with the second question. Hints and suggestions for further exploration have been provided, indicating a collaborative effort to navigate the problems.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of direction in starting the proofs, and there is a hint provided for the second question that references Wilson's Theorem, suggesting a specific mathematical concept under consideration.

ak_89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions I am having troubles with. If someone can push me in the right direction that would be awesome. Here are the questions:

1. Prove that the prime divisors, p cannot equal 3, of the integer n2-n+1 have the form 6k+1. (Hint: turn this into a statement about (-3/p) )

2. Show that if p is congruent to 1 (mod 4), then x2 is congruent to -1 (mod p) has a solution given by the least residue (mod p) of ( (p-1)/2)!

I honestly have no idea how to start. I would greatly appreciate some help.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first question, try multiplying the n2-n+1 term by some integer and rearranging things...

Unfortunately, I'm stumped on how to do the second question :rolleyes:
 
Thanks! I got that proof. But I am still stuck on the second question as well. I played around with it.. but I have yet to get anywhere that is useful to prove the question.

I could really use some help.
 
Hint for #2: Use Wilson's Theorem.

Petek
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K