Numbers which are not exactly calculable by any method.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bjshnog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Numbers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of real numbers that are not calculable by any method, exploring concepts of computable and non-computable numbers. Participants examine the implications of countability in relation to the set of real numbers and computable numbers, as well as specific examples of known non-computable numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to prove the existence of a real number that cannot be calculated by any method, suggesting that known irrational and transcendental numbers like e or π are calculable.
  • Another participant notes that the set of computable numbers is countable while the set of all real numbers is uncountable, implying that "almost all numbers are not computable."
  • There is skepticism about the possibility of providing an example of a non-computable number, as naming such a number might inherently describe a method to compute it.
  • Participants discuss the notation for the set of real numbers, clarifying that \mathbb{R} represents the set of all real numbers, which is distinct from a hypothetical "set of everything."
  • A participant mentions Chaitin's constant as an example of a non-computable real number with known properties.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of Ω, a non-computable number, and seeks information on other non-computable numbers with known properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the existence and examples of non-computable numbers, with some agreeing on the theoretical implications of countability while others remain skeptical about providing concrete examples. The discussion does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in defining non-computable numbers and the challenges in providing examples, as well as the dependence on the definitions of computability and the nature of real numbers.

bjshnog
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Is there any way to prove that a real number exists which is not calculable by any method?

For example, you could have known irrational and/or transcendental numbers like e or π. You could have e^x where x is any calculable number, whether it be by infinite series with hyperbolic/normal trigonometric functions and an infinite number of random terms, and use that as the upper limit for an integral of whatever other type of function or combination of functions.

Is there a possible way to prove that there exists any real number that is not equal to any combination of functions (apart from 0/0)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bjshnog said:
Is there any way to prove that a real number exists which is not calculable by any method?

For example, you could have known irrational and/or transcendental numbers like e or π. You could have e^x where x is any calculable number, whether it be by infinite series with hyperbolic/normal trigonometric functions and an infinite number of random terms, and use that as the upper limit for an integral of whatever other type of function or combination of functions.

Is there a possible way to prove that there exists any real number that is not equal to any combination of functions (apart from 0/0)?
It's easy to prove such number exists (the site micromass links to shows that the set of all "computable numbers" is countable while the set of all real numbers is uncountable. In a very real sense "almost all number are not computable".

I don't believe, however, it is possible to give an example of such a number- in fact the very naming of such a number would probably be a description of how to compute it!
 
Interesting. Just out of curiosity, is there a standard symbol for the "set of everything" or "set of all numbers"?
 
bjshnog said:
Interesting. Just out of curiosity, is there a standard symbol for the "set of everything" or "set of all numbers"?

The set of all real numbers is denoted \mathbb{R}. The latex is \mathbb{R}.

Of course that is not the set of "everything"; in standard set theory there is no set of everything. The set of real numbers is the set we're talking about when we talk about numbers in this thread. The computable numbers are a subset of the reals.

Interestingly, there is a noncomputable real number that has a name and whose properties can be talked about. It's called Chaitin's constant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitin's_constant
 
I actually began thinking about non-computable numbers, so I Googled it and found Ω. That is what led me to post here, to see if anyone knew of any other non-computable numbers with known properties.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K