Numerical Solution for Complex PDE (Ginzburg-Landau Eqn.)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on numerically solving the complex Time Domain Ginzburg-Landau Equation using a Python simulator. The user employs a fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) solver, as the odeint solver does not support complex variables. Key insights include the necessity of separating real and imaginary parts during integration and using discrete convolutional kernels for the Laplacian operator. The conversation also highlights challenges in handling nonlinear terms and the need for validation strategies in simulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Time Domain Ginzburg-Landau Equation
  • Proficiency in Python programming, specifically with NumPy
  • Knowledge of numerical methods, particularly the Runge-Kutta algorithm
  • Familiarity with discrete Laplacian operators and convolutional kernels
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of the Runge-Kutta algorithm for complex variables in Python
  • Explore finite difference methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Investigate validation techniques for numerical simulations of PDEs
  • Learn about sparse matrix encoding to optimize memory usage in simulations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and developers working on numerical simulations of complex systems, particularly in the fields of superconductivity and fluid dynamics, as well as those interested in advanced numerical methods for PDEs.

  • #31
Twigg said:
Finite difference is the method I was thinking of. Specifically, a central-difference scheme for the Laplacian. The catch is that your problem is non-linear due to the |ψ|2ψ|\psi|^{2} \psi term. You will need to use Newton's method to get a solution, and that opens a new can of worms with convergence and validation. I've never tried this personally, but I know at least one piece of commercial software (COMSOL) that uses Newton's method to solve the matrix problems of finite element methods.

Why would you think there is a problem with non-linear terms? I really can not see how this should pose a problem as long as he uses some explicit time integration scheme ( and even if he used an implicit I can not see why the difficulties would even be related to the finite difference method ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Strum said:
Why would you think there is a problem with non-linear terms? I really can not see how this should pose a problem as long as he uses some explicit time integration scheme ( and even if he used an implicit I can not see why the difficulties would even be related to the finite difference method ).
You're absolutely right, my mistake. I was thinking of a steady-state problem, which this is not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K