NxN-complex matrix, identified 2Nx2N-real matrix, determinant

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 11K views
jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
If [itex]A\in\mathbb{C}^{N\times N}[/itex] is some complex matrix, is there anything we could say about the determinant of the matrix

[tex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> \textrm{Re}(A) & -\textrm{Im}(A) \\<br /> \textrm{Im}(A) & \textrm{Re}(A) \\<br /> \end{array}\right)\quad\in\mathbb{R}^{2N\times 2N}[/tex]

where [itex]\textrm{Re}(A)\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times N}[/itex] and [itex]\textrm{Im}(A)\in\mathbb{R}^{N\times N}[/itex] have been defined by element wise real and imaginary parts?

For example, could it be that the determinant of the [itex]2N\times 2N[/itex]-matrix could be expressed as function of the determinants of the real [itex]N\times N[/itex]-matrices?

Or is the asked determinant related to the complex determinant [itex]\det(A)\in\mathbb{C}[/itex]?

I'm interested in this, because if I want to identify N-dimensional complex space with 2N-dimensional real space, then the complex linear transformation is naturally identified with the above matrix. The equation

[tex] z^2 = Az^1,\quad\quad z^1,z^2\in\mathbb{C}^N[/tex]

is equivalent with

[tex] \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> \textrm{Re}(z^2) \\ \textrm{Im}(z^2) \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> = \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> \textrm{Re}(A) & -\textrm{Im}(A) \\<br /> \textrm{Im}(A) & \textrm{Re}(A) \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> \textrm{Re}(z^1) \\ \textrm{Im}(z^1) \\<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a conjecture

I computed by brute force the following formula:

[tex] \textrm{det} \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> R_{11} & R_{12} & -I_{11} & -I_{12} \\<br /> R_{21} & R_{22} & -I_{21} & -I_{22} \\<br /> I_{11} & I_{12} & R_{11} & R_{12} \\<br /> I_{21} & I_{22} & R_{21} & R_{22} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)[/tex]
[tex] = \textrm{det}(R)^2 + \textrm{det}(I)^2 + (R_{11}I_{22} - R_{21}I_{12})^2 + (R_{22}I_{11} - R_{12}I_{21})^2<br /> + 2(R_{11}I_{21} - R_{21}I_{11})(R_{22}I_{12} - R_{12}I_{22})[/tex]
[tex] = \textrm{det}(R - iI) \textrm{det}(R + iI)[/tex]

So it seems that

[tex] \textrm{det}\left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> \textrm{Re}(A) & -\textrm{Im}(A) \\<br /> \textrm{Im}(A) & \textrm{Re}(A) \\<br /> \end{array}\right) = |\textrm{det}(A)|^2[/tex]

could be true for all [itex]A\in\mathbb{C}^{N\times N}[/itex].