Object is dragged across a semicircle's perimeter

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small object being dragged without friction along the perimeter of a semicircle. The object is subjected to gravitational forces, and the task includes proving a relationship involving force and calculating work done during its movement from the highest to the lowest point of the semicircle.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between force and gravitational components, with some attempting to prove that F = mgcosθ. Others express uncertainty about integrating to find work, questioning the direction of integration and whether a typo exists in the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights on how to approach the integration, suggesting that it may be more effective to use angular coordinates rather than Cartesian ones. There is acknowledgment of the potential for a typo in the problem statement regarding the direction of movement, and some participants are exploring the connection between angle and displacement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem may lack clarity regarding the integration limits and the variables used, which could affect their understanding and approach to the solution.

Const@ntine
Messages
285
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement



A small object with mass m is dragged without friction to the highest point of a semicircle with a radius of R, by a weightless rope.

a) If the magnitude of his velocity is constant, then his acceleration that is parallel to the semicircle, is zero. Prove that F = mgcosθ

b) Integrate the following swiftly W = ∫ F*dr, to calculate the work that is produced when the object is moved from the highest point, to the lowest.

Uz8qH6M.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) So, first up I set the direction of the force F as the Y axis, and then created the net force (I don't know the proper term yet, but you get the gist of it from the pic). Like this:

XF1pHbE.jpg


Thus: ΣFy = mat = 0 <=> F = Fgy = Fgcosθ = mgcosθ

(b) Now's the part where I can't quite figure it out. I didn't do much intergals at school, so it's pretty new to me, and I haven't reached that part in my math book. I glanced at the back and found the basic ones (eg ∫cosθdθ = sinθ + c), but I've never come across an intergal with both x & y coordinates. I took a look at other examples from the solution manual, but only one other problem was intergals, and it's quite different.

The book's answer is "mgR", and I kinda sort of found the same, but from lowest to highest, not the opposite, like the book's asking. If anyone could help me with the intergal, I'd appeciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Darthkostis said:
b) Integrate the following swiftly W = ∫ F*dr, to calculate the work that is produced when the object is moved from the highest point, to the lowest.

The book's answer is "mgR", and I kinda sort of found the same, but from lowest to highest, not the opposite, like the book's asking. If anyone could help me with the intergal, I'd appeciate it!
I'm not sure what the problem setter had in mind. From the instruction to integrate F, I would say highest to lowest is a typo. Must have meant lowest to highest. There is no information about F in a highest to lowest phase.
The "swiftly" is suspicious. Might mean that you are not supposed to do the integral at all, just use work conservation and write down mgr straight away. Hard to tell.
 
haruspex said:
I'm not sure what the problem setter had in mind. From the instruction to integrate F, I would say highest to lowest is a typo. Must have meant lowest to highest. There is no information about F in a highest to lowest phase.
The "swiftly" is suspicious. Might mean that you are not supposed to do the integral at all, just use work conservation and write down mgr straight away. Hard to tell.

Yeah, I just took it as a typo as well. From lowest to highest I get the book's result, so that's probably it.
 
Darthkostis said:

Homework Statement



A small object with mass m is dragged without friction to the highest point of a semicircle with a radius of R, by a weightless rope.

a) If the magnitude of his velocity is constant, then his acceleration that is parallel to the semicircle, is zero. Prove that F = mgcosθ

b) Integrate the following swiftly W = ∫ F*dr, to calculate the work that is produced when the object is moved from the highest point, to the lowest.

Uz8qH6M.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) So, first up I set the direction of the force F as the Y axis, and then created the net force (I don't know the proper term yet, but you get the gist of it from the pic). Like this:

XF1pHbE.jpg


Thus: ΣFy = mat = 0 <=> F = Fgy = Fgcosθ = mgcosθ

(b) Now's the part where I can't quite figure it out. I didn't do much intergals at school, so it's pretty new to me, and I haven't reached that part in my math book. I glanced at the back and found the basic ones (eg ∫cosθdθ = sinθ + c), but I've never come across an intergal with both x & y coordinates. I took a look at other examples from the solution manual, but only one other problem was intergals, and it's quite different.

The book's answer is "mgR", and I kinda sort of found the same, but from lowest to highest, not the opposite, like the book's asking. If anyone could help me with the intergal, I'd appeciate it!

You shouldn't convert to Cartesian coordinates. It is easiest to answer both questions in terms of theta. That integral solution you found is exactly what you need. Now you just need the initial and final theta.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
You shouldn't convert to Cartesian coordinates. It is easiest to answer both questions in terms of theta. That integral solution you found is exactly what you need. Now you just need the initial and final theta.

I'm not sure how though. As I've said, I'm not that familiar with intergals, so I'm not sure how to get it to work. I figure that at the highest point, theta is 90 degree, and at the lowest, it's 0 degree. But I'm not exactly sure how to handle the intergal.
 
Cutter Ketch said:
Well, you have the antiderivative, so now you just need to know about definite integrals.

https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/4adf00a8a26fd6b9d052e81607ea15c2af9d6122

I know how the basic version works (only one kind of variable, say, x), and I have some experience with more complex types, but I don't know how to connect the angle (theta) and the displacement (r). The best I've got is:

W = ∫Fdr = ∫HighestLowestmgcosθdy = ∫900mgcosθRdθ = mgR∫900(sinθ)'dθ = mgR[sinθ]900 = mgR(sin90 -sin0) = mgR

I'm not sure if that's correct though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cutter Ketch
Darthkostis said:
I know how the basic version works (only one kind of variable, say, x), and I have some experience with more complex types, but I don't know how to connect the angle (theta) and the displacement (r). The best I've got is:

W = ∫Fdr = ∫HighestLowestmgcosθdy = ∫900mgcosθRdθ = mgR∫900(sinθ)'dθ = mgR[sinθ]900 = mgR(sin90 -sin0) = mgR

I'm not sure if that's correct though.
That all looks fine, but it is a little confusing to use r and y as variable names with such non-standard meanings. You could use ds as a generic displacement along a path, and write ds=Rdθ.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cutter Ketch
haruspex said:
That all looks fine, but it is a little confusing to use r and y as variable names with such non-standard meanings. You could use ds as a generic displacement along a path, and write ds=Rdθ.
I had the y-axis in my mind, hence why I used that symbol. But yeah, your way is better.
 
  • #10
Darthkostis said:
I know how the basic version works (only one kind of variable, say, x), and I have some experience with more complex types, but I don't know how to connect the angle (theta) and the displacement (r). The best I've got is:

W = ∫Fdr = ∫HighestLowestmgcosθdy = ∫900mgcosθRdθ = mgR∫900(sinθ)'dθ = mgR[sinθ]900 = mgR(sin90 -sin0) = mgR

I'm not sure if that's correct though.

Yes, that's it. And better with Haruspex's suggested labeling.
 
  • #11
Well, that settles it then.

Thanks for the help everybody!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K