Observing someone falling into a Black Hole.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of gravitational time dilation at a black hole's event horizon, specifically how an observer perceives an object falling into a black hole. It is established that while an observer at a distance sees the infalling object appear to freeze as it approaches the event horizon, the infalling object crosses the horizon without incident from its own perspective. Communication is possible until the object crosses the event horizon, but signals cannot return once the object has fallen in. The conversation also touches on the implications of redshift and the visual representation of objects near the event horizon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational time dilation
  • Familiarity with black hole physics and event horizons
  • Knowledge of signal transmission in relativistic contexts
  • Concept of redshift and its implications in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of gravitational time dilation in detail
  • Study the properties and implications of black hole event horizons
  • Investigate the effects of redshift on light from infalling objects
  • Learn about Stephen Hawking's theories on information preservation in black holes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and anyone interested in the complexities of black hole dynamics and relativistic physics will benefit from this discussion.

Flatland
Messages
218
Reaction score
11
I understand that anything falling into black hole would appear to take forever to cross the event horizon relative to an observer at a distance. But what if you were hovering right above the event horizon and you saw someone fall in? Would they still appear to be frozen in time? If so what if you tried to shove them in?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Even then it would appear to take forever. The gravitational time-dilation at the event horizon is a proper of the horizon itself---as viewed from any finite (non-zero) distance away, the effect becomes infinite as the infalling object approaches the horizon.

The particular conditions of infall (e.g. whether they are pushed or not) doesn't matter.
 
So what if I was right behind him pushing him in as hard as I could? And also would I be able to communicate with the person falling in? And how long would I be able to communicate with him for since it takes him "forever" to fall in?
 
It doesn't matter how hard you push him. As long as you are not falling in with him, he will appear to take forever to go in.

You can communicate with him---you can send signals to him (because signals can go INTO the horizon), but he won't be able to respond (signals can't come out).

While he 'appears' to take forever to fall in, he did actually fall in----from his perspective, he cross the event horizon without anything interesting happening.
 
zhermes said:
You can communicate with him---you can send signals to him (because signals can go INTO the horizon), but he won't be able to respond (signals can't come out).

So initially I would receive his responses but not after he falls into the event horizon even though he appears to still be falling in?
 
Yes.

The exact details are a little more complicated---but yes, that is the main idea.

Imagine he sends a signal towards you every second---from his perspective (his reference frame). From your perspective his signals get farther and farther apart, until there is an infinite amount of time between the signals----in this way, you only end up receiving a certain number of signals.
From his perspective, he eventually crosses the horizon, and even though he keeps sending signals every second---only a certain number of them were sent out before he crossed the horizon---and again only a certain number of signals end up getting out to you.

In this way, both reference frames agree on the number of signals that are received---this is an important aspect of maintaining physical symmetry.
 
So what if I try to grab him at this point? Would he just be a hologram of sort?
 
You wouldn't see him by the time you got there.
Even just reaching out your arm.
 
a side question to falling into a black hole: the event horizon is a surface, right? If I watched someone fall into it, wouldn't their image become "flat"?
 
  • #10
SHISHKABOB said:
a side question to falling into a black hole: the event horizon is a surface, right? If I watched someone fall into it, wouldn't their image become "flat"?
Yes it would.
 
  • #11
So if someone were to take a close look at a black hole's event horizon, it would be a cluttered flat image of everything that ever struck the surface, right? Assuming that the black hole existed in an environment with a lot of stuff falling onto it.

whoah and wait, if something at the event horizon appears to take forever to continue falling inwards, what happens to the light that is bouncing off of an object falling onto the event horizon?
 
  • #12
SHISHKABOB said:
So if someone were to take a close look at a black hole's event horizon, it would be a cluttered flat image of everything that ever struck the surface, right?

If I'm remembering correctly off the top of my head, this is Steven Hawking's current argument for why information is not destroyed when it falls into the BH.
 
  • #13
The infalling observer has the same problem as the stationary observer. The stationary observer also becomes frozen from the perspective of the infalling observer as he reaches the event horizon, so, neither can communicate with the other. Photons from outside the EH cannot catch up with the infalling observer as he reaches the EH.
 
  • #14
zhermes said:
You wouldn't see him by the time you got there.
Even just reaching out your arm.

I'm not quite sure I understand this. I'm assuming you mean that the light is being red shifted but wouldn't you be able to see him with sensitive enough equipment?
 
  • #15
Flatland said:
I'm not quite sure I understand this. I'm assuming you mean that the light is being red shifted but wouldn't you be able to see him with sensitive enough equipment?

He would eventually be infinitely red-shifted. i.e. the photon's energy would approach zero, its wavelength would approach infinity.
 
  • #16
DaveC426913 said:
He would eventually be infinitely red-shifted. i.e. the photon's energy would approach zero, its wavelength would approach infinity.

Does it actually become infinitely red-shifted after some finite time or does it only approach infinity?
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Can there be slowly-falling accretion disks in black holes?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Undergrad Information loss in black hole, why is it a problem?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
High School What is the actual shape of black holes?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad Light curving around vortex simulating a black hole
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Does Dark Matter Fall into Black Holes?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
High School So, a black hole and an antimatter star bump into each other....
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad Can Hawking Radiation Exist If Nothing Escapes a Black Hole?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
High School What keeps most galactic stars from falling into the centeral black hole?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad You can't actually enter a blackhole?
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
High School Does my theory about black holes make sense ?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K