News Occupy Wall Street protest in New-York

  • Thread starter Thread starter vici10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wall
AI Thread Summary
The Occupy Wall Street protests in New York have entered their second week, with approximately 5,000 participants initially gathering on September 17. Protesters are voicing their discontent over issues such as bank bailouts, the mortgage crisis, and the execution of Troy Davis, leading to 80 arrests reported by the New York Times. While some view the movement as disorganized, others argue that it highlights significant economic disparities and calls for reforms like reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act. The protests are seen as a response to rising poverty and unemployment rates in the U.S., with many participants expressing frustration over the current economic situation. The ongoing demonstrations reflect a broader sentiment of dissatisfaction with the financial system and government accountability.
  • #901
WhoWee said:
Doesn't Bank of America have about 6,000 locations and 250,000 employees? My guess is most of these branches offer personal and business checking and savings accounts, make car loans, home loans, business loans, and operate 6 days per week. I doubt if more than 2 -5% of all offices have anything to do with non-retail activities.

great. and when BoA goes down, they can have a fire sale. some of those branches can get bought up by credit unions, et al. actually, now that you mention it, this is a great way to pry the retail from the non-retail activities as you put it.

fwiw, my first bank account was with a savings and loan. when they went down, my account got purchased by a large regional bank. i got a letter in the mail, and very little changed except that my new banking location was a couple of blocks away.

oh, another thing. one problem with the economy right now (and i see this even in your posts, i think) is that banks just aren't lending. perhaps people getting funds into smaller banks will spur lending on the local levels (banks can lend several times their holdings, correct?) and get things moving again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #902


Evo said:
But this has nothing to do with OWS, as a matter of fact the person that suggested this on Facebook has been emphatic that it is not related to OWS.

From your link

I disagree. The author of the idea may be simply distancing herself from the crack whores and heroin addicts who, like refrigerator magnets, have been attached to the movement.

I believe it has everything to do with the core concept behind OWS: The empowerment of average people to implement change.

I finished reading Graven's linked article this morning(It took all my willpower not to quote it every other paragraph), and ended up surfing to a couple of recent articles:

http://www.theburningplatform.com/?p=24547#comment-93830"
Posted on 5th November 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues
If Zero Hedge is right about this, Monday could be one of the most chaotic days in the history of our country. I hope they are wrong, because financial markets will collapse as people sell hundreds of billions to meet their margin calls. Stocks would be crushed. But don’t think gold and silver would be excluded. People will sell everything to meet their margin requirements. There are still two days until Monday. I’ve got to believe the BIG BOYS (Bernanke and Geithner) would threaten the CME and make them reverse this decision. Who knows what is going on behind the scenes. Our financial system is based on trust. The MF Global fraud proves that no one can be trusted. No trust means the system will seize up due to no liquidity.

I have no idea whether this will be the beginning of the end. But I do think it would be prudent to withdraw some extra cash from the ATM this weekend, just in case.


Tyler Durden said:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest...ncial-system-necessary-and-positive#comments"
11/05/2011

The only way to clear a zombie economy is to write off uncollectable debt and liquidate all the assets, loans and hedges. That would collapse our financial system, but since it is the cause of our political and economic dysfunction, that would be the highest possible good and extremely positive.

There is a great final irony in the scare-mongering threats of the skimmers and their political toadies. If the taxpayers don't bail out the skimmers, then we'll have martial law by the weekend, the smouldering fires of Europe will rekindle into open warfare, and so on.

The irony is the propping up of a deeply, intrinsically pathological and destructive financial system is not saving the economy, it's the reason the economy is imploding. The Big Lie technique of propaganda is to reverse the polarity of reality: we are told up is down until we believe it.

We are told that liquidating the overhang of bad debt, leverage and hedges would "destroy the world as we know it." The truth is that keeping the zombie system from expiring and covering up the corruption with propaganda is what's actually destroying the world as we know it.

Thus the collapse of the current financial system of central banks, pathological Wall Street and insolvent banks would be the greatest possible good and the greatest possible positive for the global economy and its participants.


Unfortunately, I have little understanding of such things, so I can't really intelligently comment on them. But I always find the articles at Zero Hedge to be most entertaining.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #903
I think that the Occupy movement is a bit more organized than many people think.

They have a website for every location complete with with video feeds.

http://gibberbabble.com/local-occupy-groups
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #904
edward said:
I think that the Occupy movement is a bit more organized than many people think.

They have a website for every location complete with with video feeds.

http://gibberbabble.com/local-occupy-groups
Yes, it was organized by a Canadian activist group called Adbusters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #905
Evo said:
Yes, it was organized by a Canadian activist group called Adbusters.
Adbusters? :smile: How do you know these things? :smile:
 
  • #906
dlgoff said:
Adbusters? :smile: How do you know these things? :smile:
If you are a policy-geek, it's easy to track this stuff as it happens. As stuff falls off the radar, it can be a bit harder, since not all news outlets archive their earlier content once the "shine" has faded.
 
  • #907
dlgoff said:
Adbusters? :smile: How do you know these things? :smile:
I read the news,

Occupy Wall Street (OWS) is an ongoing series of demonstrations in New York City based in Zuccotti Park in the Wall Street financial district. The protests were initiated by the Canadian activist group Adbusters.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street
 
  • #909
Evo said:
Thanks Evo. I'm going to have to get out of the house more.

dugout.jpg


And take advantage of this technology.
 
  • #910
Things just keep getting more and more interesting in the eToys case I mentioned way back ago:

For a decade now, I have been fighting Goldman Sachs, Mitt Romney's BAIN and their attorney's. Though I am in the valley of financial death's doorway, my hope is renewed with anxious fever of the mere possibility that justice may come. Goldman Sachs attorney's were forced in my case to confess to supplication of more than 15 written false affidavits to the court. After all, Martha Stewart went to jail for one verbal lie - shouldn't Goldman Sachs attorneys, as officers of the court, face much harsher penalties for lying to a court and deliberately killing a public company?
Though MNAT, (Goldman Sachs's Delaware law firm) has managed to thus far escape culpability for their scheme and artifices to defraud, they have bled somewhat, at times. Scott Bloch, the Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel witnessed the FBI raiding and arresting himfor destroying case files. We also found out that Goldman Sachs law firm was not being investigated by the Delaware US Attorney, despite confessions to acts of Perjury and Fraud, because the US Attorney was a former partner of Goldman Sachs law firm MNAT (see former US Attorney Colm Connolly's resume (here)). Though Colm Connolly has not been held accountable for this major ethical violation and betrayal of his oath and the public's trust, he was prevented from becoming a Delaware Federal District Court Judge (here)).

As is easy to see, Goldman Sachs walks around immune from prosecution or even verbal reference by the main stream media. We all have recently heard the issue of the $500 million dollar loan to the Solar company in Silicon Valley - Solyndra. What most are not aware of, is the fact that Goldman Sachs carved up the $10 million dollars in fees on obtaining Solyndra that loan. According to this Bloomberg story (here), Goldman Sachs was "the" financial advisor for Solyndra as the Bloombery article denotes that;

You would also think the firm's reputation police would put the kibosh on Solyndra, too. But Goldman, which Solyndra credited as the exclusive financial adviser on its Treasury loan application, kept the firm as a client through thick and thin.
But the bubble of protection for Goldman Sachs could be bursting. Despite the fact that the SEC is under investigation for extremely bad ethics in the Madoff debacle. Mary Schapiro, as head of the SEC, has just hired a Goldman Sachs's gal to head one of the SEC divisions. Everyone knows something funky is afoot when a person leaves a $50 million dollar per year job and goes into heading up a Government agency in charge of regulating securities transacted by Goldman Sachs - but we all sit idle by in abject curious silence watching.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein has deemed it appropriate to hire a personal criminal defense attorney, as is denoted by the Los Angeles Times story (here). Sachs CEO Blankfein purportedly has much to lose. But in the overall scheme of things, does he have any more to lose than you or I? If he loses $10 million here or there, he will not have another island in the Pacific. When you or I lose $10,000 - we lose our house and car. The news of Blankfein hiring a criminal attorney sent Goldman Sachs stock downward;

Investors were rattled by news that Blankfein had hired a lawyer. Goldman shares, which had barely moved all day before the news, plunged and finished the day down $5.25, or 4.7% at $106.51. The stock fell further in after-hours trading.
Goldman, the most envied name on Wall Street, has been under intense public scrutiny since the financial crisis because of the record profit it generated at a time when the national economy was still struggling.

Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi reports that the SEC has been destroying files
Helping foster the civil unrest throughout America, on Wall Street and globally, is the fact that the powers that be keep rubbing our noses in the mud, while we are down and then talk to us as if we are stupid. When my face is full of the manure you are shoveling upon us - it is intolerable to expect my ears to be able to swallow your verbal crap too.
Fortunately, along with the citizen activists and journalists, including people like Larry and Mike at GoldmanSachs666.com , there's also radical nationally known journalists like Matt Taibbi, who has the tiger Goldman Sachs' by the tail and won't let them go. In one of Taibbi's more recent stories, he points out the fact that the SEC has been destroying case files for nearly 20 years. Including Madoff case files. In his story Matt Taibbi remarks that;

This is a different world, one far friendlier to lawbreakers, where even the suspicion of wrongdoing gets wiped from the record.
That, it now appears, is exactly how the Securities and Exchange Commission has been treating the Wall Street criminals who cratered the global economy a few years back. For the past two decades, according to a whistle-blower at the SEC who recently came forward to Congress, the agency has been systematically destroying records of its preliminary investigations once they are closed. By whitewashing the files of some of the nation's worst financial criminals, the SEC has kept an entire generation of federal investigators in the dark about past inquiries into insider trading, fraud and market manipulation against companies like Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and AIG.


and Taibbi continued

With a few strokes of the keyboard, the evidence gathered during thousands of investigations "18,000 ... including Madoff," as one high-ranking SEC official put it during a panicked meeting about the destruction has apparently disappeared forever into the wormhole of history.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/29/1021278/-Its-Official-Goldman-Sachs-Rules?via=user
But yeah let's focus all of our attention on the protesters and not condemn the REAL criminals walking away completely free stealing millions of dollars from all of us.
 
  • #911
Label this post IMO - my bold.

My wife and I took our 12 year old daughter to a lunch buffet yesterday. We sat with friends and their 12 year old boy (in my daughter's class at school). The little boy kept talking about the Occupied movement - he wanted to know who the 1% people are and if the restaurant was owned by them?

His dad kept trying to change the subject, but I was curious. The boy was concerned about what would happen if the 1% went on strike and closed their businesses - out of the mouth's of babes.

At this point his dad started to explain about banks (boy has a savings account - concern followed) and stock brokers (more concern because grand pap has a stock broker). Then he asked me.

I explained the mall and plazas were owned by 1%, the NFL, NBA, NHL, and Baseball. Then he asked about the internet, TV, radio, and movies - then his dad took over the conversation.

Dad explained the 1% weren't going on strike - nothing to worry about. The boy turned to me and said he was going to be a 1% guy after college. I wished him luck and our wives changed the subject to the fall concert.
 
  • #912
gravenewworld said:
Things just keep getting more and more interesting in the eToys case I mentioned way back ago:



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/29/1021278/-Its-Official-Goldman-Sachs-Rules?via=user



But yeah let's focus all of our attention on the protesters and not condemn the REAL criminals walking away completely free stealing millions of dollars from all of us.
How do you determine who the real criminals are? By reading "laserhaas" from the DK?
 
  • #913
Laserhaas is the mergers and acquisitions lawyer that has been on the case.
 
Last edited:
  • #914
gravenewworld said:
Things just keep getting more and more interesting in the eToys case I mentioned way back ago:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/29/1021278/-Its-Official-Goldman-Sachs-Rules?via=user

But yeah let's focus all of our attention on the protesters and not condemn the REAL criminals walking away completely free stealing millions of dollars from all of us.

Since you brought up Solyndra and investigating criminal activity - as per ABC News:

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/obama...ra-deal-inside/story?id=14691618#.Trfop_QoExw

"Obama Fundraiser Pushed Solyndra Deal From Inside"

"An elite Obama fundraiser hired to help oversee the administration's energy loan program pushed and prodded career Department of Energy officials to move faster in approving a loan guarantee for Solyndra, even as his wife's law firm was representing the California solar company, according to internal emails made public late Friday.

"How hard is this? What is he waiting for?" wrote Steven J. Spinner, a high-tech consultant and energy investor who raised at least $500,000 for the candidate before being appointed to a key job helping oversee the energy loan guarantee program. "I have OVP [the Office of the Vice President] and WH [the White House] breathing down my neck on this."

Many of the emails were written just days after Spinner accepted a three-page ethics agreement in which he pledged he would "not participate in any discussion regarding any application involving [his wife's law firm] Wilson [Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati]."

Read Steven Spinner's Ethics Agreement

The $535 million loan to Solyndra was ultimately approved in 2009 and for months was touted by President Obama as a model of his efforts to create new jobs in the emerging field of clean energy. But in late August, the company abruptly shut its doors and days later declared it was filing for bankruptcy. Now the loan is the subject of multiple investigations, by Congress and by the Department of Justice."



I agree - let's appoint a special counsel and get to the bottom of this fiasco!


I guess someone already thought of that?:redface:

http://news.yahoo.com/us-rep-appoint-special-counsel-solyndra-loan-235412113.html

"The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee on Monday called for an independent investigator to look into a $528 million loan approved by the Obama administration for a now-bankrupt solar energy company.
Rep. Lamar Smith, a Republican from Texas, said an outside lawyer is needed to determine "whether politics played a role" in the Energy Department loan for California-based Solyndra Inc., which declared bankruptcy this month and laid off its 1,100 workers.
"An independent examiner will uncover the truth about whether politics played a role in influencing the Obama administration to favor Solyndra over more financially stable loan applicants and thus ensure the integrity of the bankruptcy process for all creditors," Smith wrote in a three-page letter to Attorney General Eric Holder."
 
  • #915
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b66u-mzfBPE
 
  • #916
MarcoD said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b66u-mzfBPE

"The genocide of the middle classes"?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/09/14/us-usa-taxes-middleclass-idUSTRE68D3QD20100914

"Economists generally align the group according to earnings, even if there is no standard established range.

"Most people tend to think of themselves as middle class unless they're (billionaire investor) Warren Buffett or really poor," said J.D. Foster, an economist and senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

Foster regards the upper 20 percent of earners as "upper income" and the lower 20 percent as "lower income." He regards the 60 percent in the middle as middle class, with household incomes roughly between $25,000 and $100,000.

Median household income in the United States was $52,175 in 2008, according to the U.S. Census Bureau."
 
  • #917
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...eath-article-1.973027?localLinksEnabled=false

"Vancouver mayor vows to shut down ‘Occupy’ site after suspected overdose death

Woman was found unconscious in a tent, days after man survived heroin O.D."


"Police kept mum about the cause of death, but a source told the Vancouver Sun that the situation resembled an incident on Thursday when an American man was rushed to a hospital after overdosing on heroin at the site.

At a press conference at the site on Saturday night, mayor Gregor Robertson said the encampment had become too dangerous to remain open.

"This is second critical incident in two days - obviously there is a serious problem here," Robertson said, according to the Toronto newspaper.

"Having people die … is not OK." "
 
  • #918
People are supposed to take their money out of big banks and put it in credit unions. I think that's as a part of the occupy wall street protests, but I'm not sure. Anyway, I like the idea. I think it's a win-win for the protesters, the big banks, and the credit unions. The people who are most likely to switch are those that are being ill-treated by the bank. They are being ill treated because they are money losers for the bank. I doubt the banks would go so far out of their way to antagonize their profitable customers. These customers will get better treatment at the smaller banks and the smaller banks will take a step in the direction of becoming big banks. The only problem I see is that these accounts will probably cost the smaller banks even more than they cost the big banks because of scaling issues and at the same time, the smaller banks may not have enough profitable customers to cushion the blow. The end result might be even worse service.
 
  • #919
So - did anyone run out and change banks?
 
  • #920
WhoWee said:
So - did anyone run out and change banks?
Nope.
 
  • #921
OWS is just another progressive/socialist movement that has been tied to the renamed ACORN organization and all the corporation haters. As soon as the tie was made, the new "ACORN" rev'd the document shredders up full tilt and removed all ACORN labels, signs, etc. to the back room. Even their own workers said they were paid to protest for OWS. Oh, and do not forget the nation’s largest union, SEIU, and they are key to OWS too... not like they have any conflict of interest there. I bet their exec's work for free to benefit the union, lol.

For the 51% of Americans that don't pay taxes, GTFO of my pocket and go get a better job... or perhaps your 1st job. If you want to buy a house, get a job FIRST and buy something you can afford. No one with a job should get away without paying some tax. If you don't have a dog in the fight, you have no reason to give a damn about the other guy, his family, or company which is paying for the 51% moocher crowd. Perhaps, if everyone paid something in tax, they’d begin to care about what services the government (we) pay for and think necessary. E.g. NEA, if the art is so bad it can’t sustain a fan base, it should follow the evolutionary path to extinction.
 
  • #922
My wife and I changed to a credit union ~5 years ago. The local bank started charging fees for everything, even though they had enough money to build new branches in other towns every year or two. When we started out with them, they would do anything for a good customer - not now. When we sold our last (too-big) house, we simply stuck the check in that bank, and I started shopping around for money-market accounts. I found one that paid over twice the interest rate as the local savings bank, and arranged to establish an account with them. When I went to the local bank to get a check made out in my name to that account, the teller said she couldn't issue checks that large. I asked her to bring out the manager so I could get my money out of that account, and the manager took her own sweet time coming out of her office. Then, she started giving me a hard time for taking MY money out of the bank to try to earn some interest on it. I was patient until about 15 minutes into her pleading and excuses, then I got loud and said that because of this kind of crappy service, I would soon be moving all my smaller accounts (checking, savings, CDs) to the credit union so they'd never see another cent from me. Due in part to all the delay in my line, there were plenty of people in the lobby to hear me. I got my check and she signed it without saying a word.

A year or so afterward, a fellow who buys and selectively cuts large tracts of land, then resells the land (a VERY well-to-do fellow) asked the loan officer for a $1M line of credit so he could buy some new wood-harvesting equipment, and they refused him. He went across the street to talk to the owner of all the new auto-sale businesses in the region. That fellow was also a long-standing member of the bank's board. When the loan officer again refused to issue the line of credit in his presence, they lost a senior board member and two of their largest depositors, plus all the car-financing business that their board member had directed their way. The two of them went to another bank in town, set up new accounts and had all their money transferred to them. My defection didn't make a dent in their bottom line, but those two guys really hurt them. The former board-member owns dealerships of all kinds (except Saab) so you can't buy an American branded vehicle of any type in this region without buying from his dealerships. For almost 100 years, his family had a lock on GM vehicles of all kinds, then he bought all the others, too. Ford, Jeep, Dodge, and their related brands. I haven't bumped into the bank president (he was a year behind me in HS) to ask him how the auto-loan part of their business is going. :devil:

Sorry for the long rant. I used to be able to call that bank and get a personal loan for a few thousand dollars just on my word, so it was pretty galling to be treated like a faceless number.
 
  • #923
Looks like SEC members have been up to fishy things in order to help cover up the massive amounts of fraud that their friends on Wall St. have been doing for quite a while:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/business/watchdog-finds-sec-erred-in-destroying-records.html

Darcy Flynn, the S.E.C. enforcement lawyer, has claimed that more than 9,000 records related to preliminary investigations were destroyed. Ms. Flynn said they included inquiries into Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, Lehman Brothers and Mr. Madoff.

Mr. Kotz’s report mentions documents related to Lehman Brothers and Mr. Madoff. It says that from 1992 through July 2010, 10,468 preliminary inquiries were closed without developing into formal investigations.

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-17/wall_street/30020167_1_sec-goldman-sachs-documents

The SEC, which recently launched a whistle blower program that offers financial rewards for people who report securities violations, now has one of its own attorneys alleging that the agency destroyed thousands of documents involving banks and hedge funds, Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi reported.

The allegations come from SEC attorney Darcy Flynn, who is a 13-year veteran with the agency. According to the report, Flynn claims the SEC has been destroying records relating to the investigations of financial criminals since 1993.


Some of the records that were allegedly destroyed involve Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Lehman Brothers, Deutsche Bank, SAC Capital and Madoff.

What's more is Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who is also the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee has requested that the SEC look into the allegations.

"From what I've seen, it looks as if the SEC might have sanctioned some level of case-related document destruction," Sen. Chuck Grassley said. "It doesn't make sense that an agency responsible for investigations would want to get rid of potential evidence. If these charges are true, the agency needs to explain why it destroyed documents, how many documents it destroyed over what time frame and to what extent its actions were consistent with the law."

Ironically, the new whistle blower program the SEC launched allows company employees who report securities law violations to the agency to be eligible for financial reward if their tip leads to an enforcement action and a fine of more than $1 million.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-sec-covering-up-wall-street-crimes-20110817

Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes?
Matt Taibbi: A whistle blower says the agency has illegally destroyed thousands of documents, letting financial crooks off the hook.




And how many American lost their entire life's savings, homes, and jobs after the economy tanked in 2008? Meanwhile these white collar criminals continue to walk away completely free AND keep the millions they swindled while tax payers have to bail them out when their games start to unravel. I guess that's what happens when you have a revolving door between the regulators and the regulated.


God freakin bless the protesters. This crap has to stop. Is this a democracy or a complete farce?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #924
gravenewworld said:
God freakin bless the protesters.
What, exactly, have the protestors accomplished? I haven't heard of anything.
 
  • #925
Evo said:
What, exactly, have the protestors accomplished? I haven't heard of anything.

What have you accomplished? At least they are starting to raise awareness of the rampant corruptions plaguing our system.
 
  • #926
gravenewworld said:
What have you accomplished? At least they are starting to raise awareness of the rampant corruptions plaguing our system.
I've accomplished many things, although it makes no sense for you to ask.

I don't think they've done even that. What's in the news is when they get arrested for violence and drug overdoses. That's the awareness they are raising, that they're trouble.

There are positive things these people could be doing like write in campaigns to their representatives.
 
  • #927
gravenewworld said:
Laserhaas is the mergers and acquisitions lawyer that has been on the case.
Oh? I see LH has been involved in some law suits, but how do you know he/she is a lawyer, or doing M&A, or even know his/her name?
 
  • #928
Evo said:
What, exactly, have the protestors accomplished? I haven't heard of anything.
Now Evo. This thread wouldn't have been possible without them. I'm an old hippie so, "Power to the People". :biggrin:
 
  • #929
dlgoff said:
Now Evo. This thread wouldn't have been possible without them. I'm an old hippie so, "Power to the People". :biggrin:

Sure dlgoff - Right ON!

IMO - all they've done is help aging hippies reminisce about the good old days.:wink:
 
  • #930
Evo said:
I've accomplished many things, although it makes no sense for you to ask.

I don't think they've done even that. What's in the news is when they get arrested for violence and drug overdoses. That's the awareness they are raising, that they're trouble.

There are positive things these people could be doing like write in campaigns to their representatives.
bolding mine

I've decided to change my view of the whole situation. It is not the crack whores and heroin addicts that have infiltrated OWS, it's the other way around.

OWS has invaded the sacred territory of one sector of what is worst about about America.

Heroin addicts have been overdosing in our inner cities for decades. Only now it's fashionable to badmouth OWS for the problem. I've been watching these kids die before my eyes for the last 20 years. It's been really sad, but I've always felt powerless.

I tried to post something a couple of nights ago, but the forum must have been down for maintenance. Let's try it again...

edward said:
The Occupy hand signs...weird but it seems to be working...have the aliens invaded?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_hand_signals

That is kind of weird.

Evo's new "You guys are off topic!" signal:
IMG_9465.JPG

But I think aluminum foil is required for evidence of alien invasions.

Anyways, I found the following article refreshing:

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/s-hard-animals-occupy-wall-street-zuccotti-park-luxury-a-warm-office-article-1.972785?localLinksEnabled=false"
Protesters are not the uncooth pack that some would like you to believe they are.
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Saturday, November 5 2011, 7:37 PM
Jimmy Breslin
...
On Friday, the New York Post runs a front page that screams:

“Occupy Wall Street animals go wild. ...”

...

Underneath the headline, a big photo of a bald man in blue throwing a left hand at some much younger guy in the park. Inside the paper, there were two pages showing a fight between two senseless and homeless men. Following were two more pages of people being called morons and animals.

But actually walking around Zuccotti Park, you find the scene pleasant and moderate. The large crowds coming here now are filled with children walking in front of their parents.

...
Sitting in chairs with their laps filled with wool were two women who had been in this park from the start, 37 days as of yesterday. Here is Marsha Spencer who lives in Hell’s Kitchen in Manhattan. She sits with hardly a word out of her as these big needles in her hands work on thick wool face masks, knitting colorful lines of red and blue into a white background.

Sitting a couple of feet away with the same concentration was Karin, and her last name is hers and not yours. She is from the East Village and knits here every day.

We stop when the sky becomes too dark for us to work our needles, Karin said.

This is molestation? Lawlessness? These are animals? Morons?

That’s another kind of story, all right.

See everyone! OWS'ers aren't a bunch of rapists and looters. They're knitters.

:smile:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Breslin" , 81 years old journalist, author, and resident of NYC.

Among his notable columns (perhaps the best known) was the column published the day after John F. Kennedy's funeral, focusing on the man who had dug the president's grave. The column is indicative of Breslin's style, which often highlights how major events or the actions of those considered "newsworthy" affect the "common man".​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #931
OmCheeto said:
bolding mine

I've decided to change my view of the whole situation. It is not the crack whores and heroin addicts that have infiltrated OWS, it's the other way around.

OWS has invaded the sacred territory of one sector of what is worst about about America.

Heroin addicts have been overdosing in our inner cities for decades. Only now it's fashionable to badmouth OWS for the problem. I've been watching these kids die before my eyes for the last 20 years. It's been really sad, but I've always felt powerless.

I tried to post something a couple of nights ago, but the forum must have been down for maintenance. Let's try it again...



That is kind of weird.

Evo's new "You guys are off topic!" signal:
IMG_9465.JPG

But I think aluminum foil is required for evidence of alien invasions.

Anyways, I found the following article refreshing:



See everyone! OWS'ers aren't a bunch of rapists and looters. They're knitters.

:smile:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Breslin" , 81 years old journalist, author, and resident of NYC.

Among his notable columns (perhaps the best known) was the column published the day after John F. Kennedy's funeral, focusing on the man who had dug the president's grave. The column is indicative of Breslin's style, which often highlights how major events or the actions of those considered "newsworthy" affect the "common man".​


Are you still trying to get banned - or are you back?:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #932
WhoWee said:
Are you still trying to get banned - or are you back?:smile:

Just spreadin' the hippie retro-love vibes to let the kids know, that there are geriatric hippies out here, that have their backs.

It we go down, we all go down, together.

cue the Omusic...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CABCIseO8Zo
 
  • #933
Om, I only said that what people see in the media are the violence and the drug overdoses.

What's in the news is when they get arrested for violence and drug overdoses. That's the awareness they are raising, that they're trouble.
The press they get is bad press. It's not helping.
 
  • #934
Evo said:
Om, I only said that what people see in the media are the violence and the drug overdoses.

The press they get is bad press. It's not helping.

Especially when so many media consumers are not properly skeptical. If the media outlet they're watching matches their political leaning and worldview, they believe every word.
 
  • #935
  • #936
Except in the 60s & 70s hippies were largely non-violent. Yea, we had the black panthers, SLA, etc., but they weren't hippies. Even the war protestors were better behaved than these OWS nuts. Although, the anarchist folks are probably a factor in the mood changes of some protestors. Have you listened to these nut cases being interviewed on the news? It would be funny if they weren't serious. The guy yesterday saying he's communist and American has to be taken down. Then there is the “corporations get away without paying taxes” crowd. omfg. Anyone out there think all business large and small don’t pass the increase in taxes off to customers or just move away to a lower tax state?
 
  • #937
ThinkToday said:
The guy yesterday saying he's communist and American has to be taken down.

Really?? So only your definition of "American" is what is allowed?
 
  • #938
daveb said:
Really?? So only your definition of "American" is what is allowed?
What do you mean? What did he define?
 
  • #939
Evo said:
What do you mean? What did he define?

It's that sentence

The guy yesterday saying he's communist and American has to be taken down.

Why would someone who is Communist and American need to be "taken down", as if they are mutually exclusive?
 
  • #940
"he's communist and American has to be taken down", bad edit, I meant America and not American.

So how much credibility do you give to the rant from a group that thinks the "fix" is to take America down? I don't see pushing the destruction of the country as a "fix". Do you?

FYI, he looked like a 50/60ish American male representing this "group". Looked like an average middle aged guy, but wow, the things he said. Not all these people are wild-eyed young people bent on taking down corporate America... some are older, and if they had a job, they'd probably be quite and happy to be making a living.

As for my definition of American, speak your mind. It is American. I can always change the channel. But, when you lose the audience, your words mean zip, since only you are listening. Points of view can debated, but a unilateral rant is what people do when trying for force themselves on others. Screw em. Oh, and the guy wants to destroy America, so that makes him un-American by definition. duh.
 
Last edited:
  • #941
ThinkToday said:
"he's communist and American has to be taken down", bad edit, I meant America and not American.

So how much credibility do you give to the rant from a group that thinks the "fix" is to take America down? I don't see pushing the destruction of the country as a "fix". Do you?

FYI, he looked like a 50/60ish American male representing this "group". Looked like an average middle aged guy, but wow, the things he said. Not all these people are wild-eyed young people bent on taking down corporate America... some are older, and if they had a job, they'd probably be quite and happy to be making a living.

As for my definition of American, speak your mind. It is American. I can always change the channel. But, when you lose the audience, your words mean zip, since only you are listening. Points of view can debated, but a unilateral rant is what people do when trying for force themselves on others. Screw em. Oh, and the guy wants to destroy America, so that makes him un-American by definition. duh.

I saw the "interview" - not certain anyone else on the planet is on the same wavelength as that fellow?
 
  • #942
ThinkToday said:
"he's communist and American has to be taken down", bad edit, I meant America and not American.

So how much credibility do you give to the rant from a group that thinks the "fix" is to take America down? I don't see pushing the destruction of the country as a "fix". Do you?

FYI, he looked like a 50/60ish American male representing this "group". Looked like an average middle aged guy, but wow, the things he said. Not all these people are wild-eyed young people bent on taking down corporate America... some are older, and if they had a job, they'd probably be quite and happy to be making a living.

As for my definition of American, speak your mind. It is American. I can always change the channel. But, when you lose the audience, your words mean zip, since only you are listening. Points of view can debated, but a unilateral rant is what people do when trying for force themselves on others. Screw em. Oh, and the guy wants to destroy America, so that makes him un-American by definition. duh.

WOW that is the type of right wing rant I usually only see in my local online newspaper. Do you wish to substantiate anything with a link or are we to just supposed to take your word for it??

Edit: The same goes for post 921.
 
  • #943
Evo said:
Om, I only said that what people see in the media are the violence and the drug overdoses.

The press they get is bad press. It's not helping.

The "they"(underlined mine) is what I've been trying to figure out. But I agree, the press this "event" is getting is very bad.

and perhaps I was bold dyslexic way back when...

Evo said:
gravenewworld said:
Evo said:
gravenewworld said:
God freakin bless the protesters.
What, exactly, have the protestors accomplished? I haven't heard of anything.
What have you accomplished? At least they are starting to raise awareness of the rampant corruptions plaguing our system.
I've accomplished many things, although it makes no sense for you to ask.

I don't think they've done even that. What's in the news is when they get arrested for violence and drug overdoses. That's the awareness they are raising, that they're trouble.

There are positive things these people could be doing like write in campaigns to their representatives.

Both here, and on the media, because of OWS, I've been hearing ideas that you would only here at PF.

The above may not seem logical: "The stuff you've been hearing at PF is only heard at PF"?
But sometimes garbage I've(et al) spewed out, bears repeating, as, as far as I'm concerned, is not garbage.
 
Last edited:
  • #944
Evo said:
Om, I only said that what people see in the media are the violence and the drug overdoses.

The press they get is bad press. It's not helping.

We don't even see that down here. There is practically zero Occupy Wallstreet coverage in my (large/popular) city. Yet, I turn on the internets and it's all over the place. I read an article the other day about the police putting undercover cops into the protest to cause problems so they could clear out an area/park/whatever!

I guess there's no time to report on that sort of stuff, what with all the http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/11/dancing-with-the-stars-who-was-ejected.html" (Seriously, whtn is I4 not congested).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #945
ThinkToday said:
LOL, you want me to link things in the current news! omfg, get off your lazy butt and Google it. Typical liberal always wanting others to do the work for you.

Perhaps you are unaware of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=113181" . To quote:

2) Citations of sources for any factual claims (primary sources should be used whenever possible).
3) Any counter-arguments to statements already made must clearly state the point on which there is disagreement, the reason(s) why a different view is held, and cite appropriate sources to counter the argument.
4) When stating an opinion on an issue, make sure it is clearly stated to be an opinion and not asserted as fact.
You made a post with a factual claim, so you need to back up that claim.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #946
daveb said:
Perhaps you are unaware of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=113181" . To quote:


You made a post with a factual claim, so you need to back up that claim.

Ha Ha, ok we can stick to the same guidelines used in technical discussions even though this is the "PF Lounge" discussing "Politics and World Affairs". I'll give you some sources, but omg, there are just too many. Besides, any half informed adult should know most of this from history and current news outlets. But, here you go...

JFK Voting in Chicago: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-09-26-jfk-chicago-politics_N.htm

JFK Voting in Chicago and Texas: http://stonezone.com/article.php?id=391

ACORN alive and well with a new name doing some ole same ole stuff: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...alls-for-probe-into-acorn-occupy-wall-street/

And this year’s voter fraud in action: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/25/voter-fraud-allegations-hit-san-francisco-mayors-race/

And another absentee ballot investigation: http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/PressReleases/2011/2011-07-05.aspx

Tax Info, from FactCheck.org “Who pays all of these taxes? The best information on that comes from the Congressional Budget Office, which has tracked the tax burden for many years. The most recent complete data cover 2007. CBO figured in that year more than half of all federal taxes was paid by the top 10 percent of income earners. They paid 55 percent of all federal taxes in 2007, CBO said.

That's a comprehensive figure, counting the income tax, payroll taxes, excise taxes and even the corporate income tax (borne by stockholders in the form of reduced dividends and appreciation). And perhaps surprisingly, the top 10 percent of earners pay a greater share of federal taxes now than they did before the Bush tax cuts, which Democrats constantly criticize as a giveaway to "the rich." The top 10 percent paid 50 percent of all federal taxes in 2001.

However, that comes in spite of lower tax rates at the top, not because of it. The reason the most affluent 10 percent pay a greater share of taxes is that they are getting a greater share of all income. Their share of all pre-tax income went from 37.5 percent in 2001 to 42 percent in 2007.

One figure that gets a lot of attention is the percentage of individuals and married couples who pay zero federal income taxes. Those figures come from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. The TPC's most recent report was released June 14, and it shows that this year 46.4 percent of "tax units" (individuals or married couples) had zero federal income tax liability. That's because of various exemptions and tax credits aimed at reducing the income-tax burden on lower-income workers and families with children. The figure is down from 2008 and 2009, when the percentage topped out at 50.8 percent.”

LOL, there is so much it’s hard to find the specific piece I saw on the news, but I’ll keep looking. The 51% freeloader number was off a bit (50.8%) from the report I saw, and that has been revised down to 46.4% this year. So, 46.4% don't give a rip if government raises taxes, since they won't pay a dime. Sure more benefits, its FREEEEEEEE
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #947
ThinkToday said:
JFK Voting in Chicago: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-09-26-jfk-chicago-politics_N.htm

JFK Voting in Chicago and Texas: http://stonezone.com/article.php?id=391

Can't see the first link link - I think you have to be a subscriber to USA Today.

As for the second piece, it's an opinion piece of a book review - I don't see any sources Mr. Stone uses to back up his claims. Besides, what does what happened 50 years ago have to do with today?

ACORN alive and well with a new name doing some ole same ole stuff: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...alls-for-probe-into-acorn-occupy-wall-street/

I'm not sure what you're getting at here - this is about NYCC and allegations it rerouted (illegally, according to the allegations) money to OWS, but how is that an indictment of OWS?


From your link (my bold):
But John Arntz, the director of the San Francisco City and County Department of Elections, has said that he doesn't think there is a clear cut case of voter fraud because, among other reasons, the site was not a sanctioned polling place involving election workers.

"There's nothing that I saw that is a clear violation of the election code. I mean, on its face, it doesn't look real good," Arntz said.

Where exactly is the voter fraud?

Tax Info, from FactCheck.org “Who pays all of these taxes? The best information on that comes from the Congressional Budget Office, which has tracked the tax burden for many years. The most recent complete data cover 2007. CBO figured in that year more than half of all federal taxes was paid by the top 10 percent of income earners. They paid 55 percent of all federal taxes in 2007, CBO said.

That's a comprehensive figure, counting the income tax, payroll taxes, excise taxes and even the corporate income tax (borne by stockholders in the form of reduced dividends and appreciation). And perhaps surprisingly, the top 10 percent of earners pay a greater share of federal taxes now than they did before the Bush tax cuts, which Democrats constantly criticize as a giveaway to "the rich." The top 10 percent paid 50 percent of all federal taxes in 2001.

However, that comes in spite of lower tax rates at the top, not because of it. The reason the most affluent 10 percent pay a greater share of taxes is that they are getting a greater share of all income. Their share of all pre-tax income went from 37.5 percent in 2001 to 42 percent in 2007.

One figure that gets a lot of attention is the percentage of individuals and married couples who pay zero federal income taxes. Those figures come from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. The TPC's most recent report was released June 14, and it shows that this year 46.4 percent of "tax units" (individuals or married couples) had zero federal income tax liability. That's because of various exemptions and tax credits aimed at reducing the income-tax burden on lower-income workers and families with children. The figure is down from 2008 and 2009, when the percentage topped out at 50.8 percent.”

LOL, there is so much it’s hard to find the specific piece I saw on the news, but I’ll keep looking. The 51% freeloader number was off a bit (50.8%) from the report I saw, and that has been revised down to 46.4% this year. So, 46.4% don't give a rip if government raises taxes, since they won't pay a dime. Sure more benefits, its FREEEEEEEE

I'm not sure what this has to do with OWS, but go ahead and keep posting OT links.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #948
daveb said:
I'm not sure what this has to do with OWS, but go ahead and keep posting OT links.

I haven't had time to take a look at any of his links. I did though look up the person behind one though:

Roger Stone

* "Unless you can fake sincerity, you'll get nowhere in this business." (one of Stone's favorites)
* "Politics with me isn't theater. It's performance art. Sometimes, for its own sake."
* "Don't order fish at a steakhouse,"
* "White shirt + tan face = confidence,"
* "Undertakers and chauffeurs are the only people who should be allowed by law to wear black suits."
* "Hit it from every angle. Open multiple fronts on your enemy. He must be confused, and feel besieged on every side."
* "Always praise 'em before you hit 'em."
* "Be bold. The more you tell, the more you sell." (attributed to advertising guru David Ogilvy)
* "Losers don't legislate." (from Richard Nixon)
* "Admit nothing, deny everything, launch counterattack." ("Often called the Three Corollaries", Stone says of this rule.)
* "Nobody ever built a statue to a committee."
* "Avoid obviousness."
* "Never do anything till you're ready to do it."
* "Look good = feel good."
* "Always keep the advantage."
* "Never complain, never explain."
* "Lay low, play dumb, keep moving."
* "Always mount your protest or picket sign on a good solid piece of wood. Comes in handy as a bat if some union goons want to scuffle."

I don't think any of the above will ever come out of my fingertips on the "Favorite Quotes" thread.
 
  • #949
@Think Today

"LOL, you want me to link things in the current news! omfg, get off your lazy butt and Google it. Typical liberal always wanting others to do the work for you."

Are you one of those "tough guys" insulting others in anonymity? I love how Coulter, Franken, many others are tough-enough to insult others in their books, yet do not have it in them to go to a coffee shop or bookstore and insult their opponnents face-to-face.

Still, applying the same rigour standards, why don't you back up this claim too? Or maybe we
can all start going down that road.
 
Last edited:
  • #950
Is the perception of the "movement" changing?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...ats-from-ows/2011/11/07/gIQA866IxM_story.html

"As radicalism creeps in, credibility retreats from OWS"

"At what point does a protest movement become an excuse for camping? At what point is utopianism discredited by the seedy, dangerous, derelict fun fair it creates? At what point do the excesses of a movement become so prevalent that they can reasonably be called its essence? At what point do Democratic politicians need to repudiate a form of idealism that makes use of Molotov cocktails?

The emergence of Occupy Wall Street raised Democratic hopes for the emergence of a leftist equivalent to the Tea Party movement. The comparison is now laughable. Set aside, for a moment, the reports of sexual assault in Zuccotti Park and the penchant for public urination. Tea Party activists may hate politicians, but they venerate American political institutions. Veneration does not always involve understanding. But the Tea Party’s goal is democratic influence."
 

Similar threads

Back
Top