Odds ratio and percentages.... absolute beginner

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding odds ratios, particularly in the context of mental health conditions such as General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and Major Depression (MD). Participants explore how odds ratios relate to percentages and the implications of these relationships for interpreting statistical information.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the odds ratio as a measure of how the likelihood of having GAD changes for men with MD compared to the general population, providing specific numerical examples.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about how to interpret the odds ratio and its relationship to percentages, questioning how to compare across different subsets.
  • A later reply suggests that the odds ratio is always in reference to a baseline, with values above 1 indicating increased likelihood.
  • Some participants note the importance of understanding how small percentages can lead to misleading interpretations in media reporting, particularly when discussing increases in risk.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the concept of odds ratios and their implications. While some grasp the relationship between odds ratios and percentages, others remain confused about how to apply these concepts in practical scenarios. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best way to interpret these statistical measures.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions underlying the calculations of odds ratios and the definitions of the terms used. Participants do not fully resolve the mathematical intricacies involved in comparing odds ratios across different populations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in statistics, particularly in the context of health-related research, as well as those seeking to understand how to interpret odds ratios and percentages in real-world applications.

RabbitWho
Messages
152
Reaction score
18
Imagine that the chances in the USA of adult men having GAD are on average 1 in 100. But what of the subset of adult men who already have MD? What are the chances that such men will have GAD as well as MD? An odds ratio tells us about the increase in the chance that such men will have GAD, already having MD. If having MD increases the chances of having GAD from the usual 1 in 100 to 8.2 in 100, then the odds ratio for having GAD when you have MD is 8.2. If having MD has no effect at all on the chances of having GAD then the odds ratio is 1.00 (it does not affect the odds). An odds ratio of 1.05 means for the population of men with MD the chances of having GAD are increased by 5%. The further away from 1 the odds ratio is, the stronger the effect.


Ok, forgive me because I'm absolutely hopeless at numbers

This is out of 100, so I would have thought to increase the odds ratio which was previously 1, by 5% it would have to now be an odds ratio of 6
So if the 5% is suddenly turning into 0.05 of a whole, it must be 5% not of the current set of 100 but of a different set which this current set is a subset of.

I really don't understand how you are comparing across subsets like that and how Joe Bloggs, as a sufferer of MD, is supposed to figure out how much his chance of GAD has increased relative to what it was before he had MD
For the curious: MD = Major Depression, GAD = General Anxiety Disorder
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh wait wait wait..

So the way odds ratio differs from percentage is that it is ALWAYS in reference to something else? Is that it?

So 1 is ALWAYS the same as the thing its in reference to, and anything above 1 tells you how much it has changed...

So if the GAD odds ratio for people with MD is 3 that means people with MD are 3 times more likely to have GAD than people without it, and the 0.05 is the % of one...

Ok sorry, I get it now, but my little rabbit mind is blown
 
The description is talking about 5% of the 1% that was started from.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RabbitWho
mathman said:
The description is talking about 5% of the 1% that was started from.
The fact that a number can increase in size in this self-referential way is neat. You number people and the things you do.
 
RabbitWho said:
The fact that a number can increase in size in this self-referential way is neat. You number people and the things you do.

You have to be careful when reading things about percentages in the newspapers or hearing them on TV about this very point. If you have a small percentage of something often the headline is "doing such and such increases your chance of getting condition X by 20%". And it makes it sound like there's a 20% chance of getting condition X if you do such and such. But, actually, if the chance of getting condition X is only 1% (1 in a hundred), then a 20% increase only increases that to 1.2%. It doesn't increase it to 21%: that would be increasing the risk by a factor of 20.

It's something to look out for in any case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K