Old topic, different look, maybe (Money = work/knowledge )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex_Go
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Money Topic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between money, work, and knowledge, exploring the implications of the equation Money = work/knowledge. Participants examine the validity of conclusions drawn from this relationship, particularly regarding the notion that less knowledge equates to more money.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the conclusion "the less you know, the more money you get" is incorrect and proposes that it should be "the more you know, the more money you get to keep."
  • Another participant critiques the reasoning by stating that the original conclusion is flawed, using the phrase "mixing apples and oranges" to indicate a logical inconsistency.
  • A third participant humorously references a fictional attribution to Dr. Abbot and Professor Costello, implying a lack of seriousness in the argument.
  • A later reply reiterates the critique of mixing concepts, suggesting a mathematical approach to reconcile the ideas of apples and oranges through linear combinations.
  • One participant notes that this topic has been previously discussed, leading to a closure of the thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the conclusions drawn from the relationship between money, work, and knowledge. There is no consensus on the validity of the initial claims or the implications of the proposed equation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes a mix of informal critiques and humorous references, which may obscure the underlying mathematical or conceptual arguments. The relationship between the terms used is not fully resolved, and assumptions about the definitions of money, work, and knowledge remain implicit.

Alex_Go
1. Time is money
2. Knowledge is power
3. Power = Work/time

Therefore;

Money = work/knowledge

"which proves the less you know, the more money you get. " seems like a wrong conclusion
shouldn't it be [...] which proves the more you know, the more money you get to keep, instead?
I mean, there's always someone out there to get you, and not all work is a positive number, so...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing apples and oranges, so naturally your conclusion is bananas
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, Evo, Bystander and 7 others
Sounds like something formulated by Dr. Abbot and Professor Costello.

--diogenesNY
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, Evo, russ_watters and 1 other person
phinds said:
You are mixing apples and oranges, so naturally your conclusion is bananas

I know how to do this! Find a set of apples and oranges. Take the free vector space on this set of apples and oranges. Now apples and oranges can be mixed, i..e, it is possible to take linear combinations of apples and oranges.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, weirdoguy, Evo and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
68
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K