Olympic Opening Parade of Nations

  • Thread starter Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the perceived lack of racial diversity in the Olympic Parade of Nations, with participants noting that many countries, particularly in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia, exhibit homogeneity. The United States is highlighted as an exception due to its diverse population, which is a result of immigration over the past 232 years. Participants express a desire for greater cultural mixing globally, reflecting on the historical context of nations and the implications of racial diversity in national representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cultural diversity and its implications in global contexts.
  • Knowledge of historical immigration patterns, particularly in the United States.
  • Familiarity with the concept of national identity and its evolution over time.
  • Awareness of the significance of the Olympic Games as a cultural event.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the history of immigration in the United States and its impact on cultural diversity.
  • Explore the demographics and cultural composition of Eastern European and Scandinavian countries.
  • Investigate the role of the Olympics in promoting cultural exchange and diversity.
  • Study the historical context of Native American populations and their representation in modern America.
USEFUL FOR

Social scientists, cultural anthropologists, historians, and anyone interested in the dynamics of race, immigration, and national identity in the context of global events like the Olympics.

tribdog
Messages
768
Reaction score
17
You know what I noticed most about the parade of all the different nations at the olympics? The lack of racial diversity in most countries. It was almost disturbing for some reason.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
America is actually pretty unique in that regard. You look at places like Eastern Europe or Scandinavia or Africa... most people who live there didn't move there, they were born there. Most people have no reason to go there.
 
Why would that be disturbing? :confused: (not all countries are melting pots)
 
Monique said:
Why would that be disturbing? :confused:

I'm not sure why it bothers me. I suppose it just shows that people aren't moving much, but I just felt like it separated nations too much. Maybe I'm just in one of my hippie moods. I'd rather see the world mix it up a little bit more.
 
tribdog said:
I'm not sure why it bothers me. I suppose it just shows that people aren't moving much, but I just felt like it separated nations too much. Maybe I'm just in one of my hippie moods. I'd rather see the world mix it up a little bit more.
Wouldn't it be terribly boring if everyone and everything would be the same everywhere? All the riches we have with the different world-cultures! :biggrin:
 
The 13 original US colonies were formed only 232 years ago. Every single person which is currently in the United States can only go back, at most, eight generations before someone in their family came from another country.

Compare that to China which goes far back as 137 generations. (going by the earliest dynasty)
 
Hey I didn't say i was right. I just said how it felt.
 
tribdog said:
Hey I didn't say i was right. I just said how it felt.

No worry, I wasn't accusing you of anything. Just gave an example to show how (relatively) new the US is.
 
B. Elliott said:
The 13 original US colonies were formed only 232 years ago. Every single person which is currently in the United States can only go back, at most, eight generations before someone in their family came from another country.

Indians?
 
  • #10
rootX said:
Indians?

I thought someone would pick up on that. I didn't consider them since there wasn't a country here when they occupied North America.

*edit* That's also why in my example with China, I only went as far back as the earliest dynasty when there's actually been people occupying the area for well over 300,000 years.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
B. Elliott said:
I thought someone would pick up on that. I didn't consider them since there wasn't a country here when they occupied North America.

*edit* That's also why in my example with China, I only went as far back as the earliest dynasty when there's actually been people occupying the area for well over 300,000 years.

You are right but it's just little disturbing - bunch of strangers coming to our and taking it away from us (it feels too unfair)... Personally, I find it really sad when we forget the original owners of NA.

But, it happened everywhere.
 
  • #12
They're not forgotten, it's just that US Americans with even just a hint of native American blood, represent only 1% of the US population. My mothers side of the family has Cherokee blood, but it's so thin that I don't feel as though it's pertinent.

Also can't forget that all Native Americans (and those in South America) originally came from Asia. That's where you start to get to a point where you begin to trace everything back to the middle east, then Africa.

We're all really Africans!
 
  • #13
I agree. I'd like to see more Chimpazees and Bonobos.
 
  • #14
They'd kick butt on the uneven parallel bars
 
  • #15
And apparently, football. Wait, that was gorillas.
 
  • #16
WarPhalange said:
America is actually pretty unique in that regard. You look at places like Eastern Europe or Scandinavia or Africa... most people who live there didn't move there, they were born there.
That's true, the histories are completely different.

Most people have no reason to go there.
Well, given any single country I guess most people have no reason to go there either. But don't mix up imigration with racial diversity. Actually quite many people have a reason to go to e.g. Sweden. In total about 1,2 million (first generation) imigrants out of a population of 9 million. Most of them (~700000) are from other European countries and usually don't look very "unswedish" though.
 
  • #17
Jordan Joab said:
I agree. I'd like to see more Chimpazees and Bonobos.

tribdog said:
They'd kick butt on the uneven parallel bars

:smile:
 
  • #18
Monique said:
Wouldn't it be terribly boring if everyone and everything would be the same everywhere? All the riches we have with the different world-cultures! :biggrin:

Very true - vive la difference!

But, to the typical American eye, it is odd to look at a group of people from country "X" and have them look all the same...that looks more like a family reunion to us.

I wouldn't say it's disturbing, but it's something unusual to us. I guess people who live in more homogenized countries would look at the American group and think, whoa, what a much of mongrels.
 
  • #19
WarPhalange said:
America is actually pretty unique in that regard.

You can say that again! Not many countries would deliberately try to provoke the Chinese by making a Sudanese refugee with little athletic ability (unlike Carl Lewis or Edwin Moses) their flag-bearer! With that in mind is it any surprise that...
... A knife-wielding Chinese man has stabbed to death the father-in-law of the U.S. Olympic men's volleyball coach at a popular tourist site in Beijing.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...lative-stabbed-death-Chinese-man-Beijing.html
 
  • #20
fourier jr said:
Not many countries would deliberately try to provoke the Chinese by making a Sudanese refugee with little athletic ability (unlike Carl Lewis or Edwin Moses) their flag-bearer!

Well done US!
 
  • #21
I missed the 'opening'---I hope they do a rerun---some have already touted it as 'something comparable won't be seen again' due to the complexity and grand scale.
 
  • #22
B. Elliott said:
I thought someone would pick up on that. I didn't consider them since there wasn't a country here when they occupied North America.
There wasn't a "country" here. :-p
 
  • #23
Those Indians could tread water like it was nobody's business
 
  • #24
tribdog said:
Those Indians could tread water like it was nobody's business
That's what I was thinking, poor guys. :biggrin:

Seriously, am I the ONLY one on this forum that notices that the smilies keep moving?
 
  • #25
Evo said:
Seriously, am I the ONLY one on this forum that notices that the smilies keep moving?

I remember rolling eye was at the top (that's why I used it three -four times) but now it is replaced by :frown: (and I don't like this color)
 
  • #26
I keep thinking for as often as they (the smilies) are used, why aren't they on the 'quick reply' area? (and maybe spellcheck, too)
 
  • #27
I think that the U.S. team should be made up entirely of native americans. You should only be aloud to play on a National team if you are at least half native.
 
  • #28
rewebster said:
I missed the 'opening'---I hope they do a rerun---some have already touted it as 'something comparable won't be seen again' due to the complexity and grand scale.

Yeah, it was pretty impressive that is for sure. The scale was huge, it makes you think wow, they made a great wall once a long time ago, but they still got it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
rootX said:
Indians?
I always roll my eyes at the American white-supremacists that you sometimes see on television "they're taking over our race, they should go back where they came from", .. yeah, following the same logic so should you :rolleyes:
 
  • #30
Maybe in a thousand years we will be mixed enough to be considered a race of Americans, then we can start being racist against other whole countries together, and we can refer to the Naive Americans as an extinct distant ancestor.
 

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K