On a Clear Day, at 6 ft tall, at the waters edge ....

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WallyTheInept
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Edge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of how far one can see a star with the naked eye from Earth, particularly focusing on visibility under clear conditions. Participants explore the distances to various stars and the factors affecting visibility, including luminosity and magnitude.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that stars vary significantly in luminosity, affecting their visibility from Earth.
  • One participant mentions that the nearest visible star, Proxima Centauri, is 4.24 light years away, while many visible stars are much farther.
  • Another participant suggests using tools like Stellarium to find stars around magnitude 5 or brighter and their distances.
  • There is mention of the star Mu Cephei being potentially the most distant naked-eye visible star, with estimates ranging from 4300 to 9300 light years.
  • Some participants discuss the visibility of the Andromeda Galaxy, which is approximately 2,500,000 light years away, as an interesting point of interest.
  • Several participants reference the star V762 Cas, claiming it to be the farthest star visible to the naked eye at about 16,308 light years away.
  • Historical examples are provided, including the supernova of 1054, which was visible from 6,500 light years away, and SN1987A, which was visible from 170,000 light years away.
  • Participants express varying levels of understanding and interest in the complexities of astronomical distances and visibility.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact distances of the farthest visible stars, with multiple competing views and estimates presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of visibility, the impact of atmospheric conditions, and the varying visual acuity of individuals.

WallyTheInept
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I can see, about 5 Km
Not bothered about Isobars or Kilojules...
So, on that basis, if I am stood on the Earth, looking at a star that is shining...not caring if it went out years ago.
How far away, can I see a star, shining, in the night sky, using just my eyes ?
On a clear, not foggy or misty night ?
In kilometers ?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Stars hugely differ in luminosity, although they are all point sources as far as our eyes can tell.
Some red dwarf stars (by far the most numerous), are fairly close to Earth but invisible to the naked eye,
on the other hand some stars which are further away are visible because of they are very bright and large stars.

Oh, and by the way, forget about kilometers for this.
The very nearest visible star Proxima Centauri is 4.24 light year away
1 light year is about 9 trillion km.
Many visible stars are thousands of times more distant than that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
WallyTheInept said:
I can see, about 5 Km
Not bothered about Isobars or Kilojoules...
So, on that basis, if I am stood on the Earth, looking at a star that is shining...not caring if it went out years ago.
How far away, can I see a star, shining, in the night sky, using just my eyes ?
On a clear, not foggy or misty night ?
In kilometres ?

from wiki
A light-year (abbreviation: ly), sometimes written light year,[3] is a unit of length used informally to express astronomical distances. It is approximately 9 trillion kilometres (or about 6 trillion miles).[note 1]

so now start looking at the distances to some of the more distant stars that can be seen naked eye from earth
and do the maths

is you use a program like Stellarium and pic on stars that are around magnitude 5 or brighter ( M4 is brighter than M5) the program will tell you the brightness and the lightyear distance to the star then convert to km's or miles

we don't use km or miles to other stars and galaxies etc ... the numbers are just too big
Dave
 
rootone said:
Stars hugely differ in luminosity, although they are all point sources as far as our eyes can tell.
Some red dwarf stars (by far the most numerous), are fairly close to Earth but invisible to the naked eye,
on the other hand some stars which are further away are visible because of they are very bright and large stars.

that didn't really answer the Q :wink:

If he picks on stars that are around the M5 - M6 magnitude ( avg naked eye visual limit) then he can search for ones in that range and Stellarium will show their distances.
I suspect the OP didn't really realize the vast distances to the starsDave
 
Thank you all for the prompt response, Yes I can see its going to be a large number, one of those questions that got put out at the marina bar.
Cheers All.
 
A bit of research seems to indicate that the Star Mu Cephei at 4300-9300 ly is likely the most distant naked-eye visible star. YOu might still see the star V76L-Cas as being listed at 16000 ly, but apparently newer measurements have put it much closer.
 
Whilst I appreciate the question was specific to a star, and of course, the OP may want only to consider actual, individually resolvable stars - It might be interesting purely as point of interest if nothing else, that the Andromeda Galaxy is visible with the naked eye, and (whilst it obviously has comparative size) is approximately 2 500 000 ly away!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: andrew s 1905
This reminds me of a (locally famous at the time) trial that my father described to me once. The defense lawyer was cross examining the prosecution's eye witness who wore a rather strong prescription of glasses and asked him, "So Mr. [Smith], how far can you see with those glasses?" to which the witness replied! "I can see the Moon! How far is that?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, _PJ_ and billy_joule
BTW, the defendant was convicted.
 
  • #10
Not unlike the oft-asked question, "How far can you see with your telescope?"
"Well, I've seen 3C273..."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
Different stars have different magnitudes, different people have different visual accuity
Arbitrarily assuming that magnitude 6 is the dimmest star that one can see with the naked eye,

http://astrobob.areavoices.com/2010/10/02/how-to-see-the-farthest-thing-you-can-see/

"The farthest star we can see with our naked eye is V762 Cas in Cassiopeia at 16,308 light-years away. Its brightness is magnitude 5.8 or just above the 6th magnitude limit. "
 
  • #12
Alan McIntire said:
Different stars have different magnitudes, different people have different visual accuity
Arbitrarily assuming that magnitude 6 is the dimmest star that one can see with the naked eye,

http://astrobob.areavoices.com/2010/10/02/how-to-see-the-farthest-thing-you-can-see/

"The farthest star we can see with our naked eye is V762 Cas in Cassiopeia at 16,308 light-years away. Its brightness is magnitude 5.8 or just above the 6th magnitude limit. "
read post #6 :wink:D
 
  • #13
Janus said:
A bit of research seems to indicate that the Star Mu Cephei at 4300-9300 ly is likely the most distant naked-eye visible star. YOu might still see the star V76L-Cas as being listed at 16000 ly, but apparently newer measurements have put it much closer.
In 1054, a star was seen from 6,500 light years away - during daylight - when it went supernova. Now we call it the Crab Nebula.
 
  • #14
russ_watters said:
In 1054, a star was seen from 6,500 light years away - during daylight - when it went supernova. Now we call it the Crab Nebula.

well, if you really want to go there ...

in 1987, SN1987A in the LMC shone brightly naked eye for a month or so ... 170,000 light years away :wink::biggrin:
Dave
 
  • #15
davenn said:
well, if you really want to go there ...

in 1987, SN1987A in the LMC shone brightly naked eye for a month or so ... 170,000 light years away :wink::biggrin:
Yeah, I did - but I was too lazy to search long enough for one that was outside our galaxy (and didn't remember any offhand).
 
  • #16
didn't have to do searches for that example ... one of the hilites of my astronomy hobby
Did photo's of that one a way back then ... real photo's ... on film ... none of this new fangled digital stuff :wink:

even got one shot of the supernova and comet Wilson in the same frame
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #17
Wow, Thanks all.
This got rather complicated, rather quickly.
Thanks for the responses, I am caught up in life situations at the mo, so I am not here much, these days.
Thanks again
TTFN
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K