Why Is \left[\frac{1}{2},1\right] a Neighborhood of 1 in \left[0,1\right]?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter funcalys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that in the metric space defined by the closed interval \([0,1]\), the set \([\frac{1}{2},1]\) is indeed a neighborhood of 1, but not of \(\frac{1}{2}\). The participants confirm that for a ball \(B_{[0,1]}(1,r)\) to be a neighborhood of 1, the radius \(r\) must be less than or equal to \(\frac{1}{2}\). Any radius \(r > 0\) centered at \(\frac{1}{2}\) will include elements outside the interval \([\frac{1}{2}, 1]\), thus failing to qualify as a neighborhood of \(\frac{1}{2}\). The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the constraints of the closed unit interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and neighborhoods
  • Familiarity with the concept of closed intervals in real analysis
  • Knowledge of the Amann-Escher textbook on functional analysis
  • Basic comprehension of open and closed balls in metric spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces in the Amann-Escher textbook
  • Learn about open and closed sets in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of neighborhoods in different metric spaces
  • Investigate examples of neighborhoods in various intervals and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching metric spaces, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of neighborhoods within closed intervals.

funcalys
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hi folks, as I was reviewing the metric space section in Amann- Escher textbook, I came across the following example of neighborhood:
"For \left[0,1\right] with the metric induced from R, \left[\frac{1}{2},1\right] is a neighborhood of 1, but not of \frac{1}{2}."
However I can't point out the exactly "r">0 satisfying B_{[0,1]}(1,r)\subseteq[0,1].
:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Won't any r < 1/2 do?
 
[1/2, 1] is a neighborhood of 1. In this case, r=1/2. Any element, of the ball with a radius of 1/2 centered at 1, has a distance less than 1/2 from 1.

[1/2,1] is not a neighborhood of 1/2. This is because any ball with a radius of r>0 centered at 1/2 contains some elements that are not in [1/2, 1].
 
guess I misunderstood some of the concept in the first place, I thought the ball centered at 1 must completely lie in the interval [1/2,1].
:D.
Thank guys.
 
It does! What makes you think there are any numbers in [1/2, 1] that are not in [1/2, 1]?
 
funcalys said:
guess I misunderstood some of the concept in the first place, I thought the ball centered at 1 must completely lie in the interval [1/2,1].
:D.
Thank guys.

So, for this example, we are not concerned with the entire real line, just the closed unit interval. So, I think that you are probably considering points like 1.1 and 1.2 (for example) to be lying in this ball. However, for this example you can just think about those points as not existing because we only care about points in the closed unit interval.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K