Undergrad On The Length of a Meter Stick

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJ_Juggernaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Meter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the length contraction paradox in special relativity (SR), where two observers, A and B, measure the length of a meter stick differently due to their relative motion. Observer B, who is stationary, measures the stick as one meter, while observer A, who is moving, measures it as less than one meter. This discrepancy is not a paradox but a fundamental aspect of SR, which states that length is measured in the frame where the object is at rest. The conversation emphasizes that misunderstanding these principles leads to perceived contradictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity (SR)
  • Familiarity with the concept of length contraction
  • Knowledge of inertial frames of reference
  • Comprehension of the relativity of simultaneity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of special relativity in detail
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their implications
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in different inertial frames
  • Investigate practical applications of length contraction in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of relativistic effects on measurements.

DJ_Juggernaut
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Can a single meter stick be one meter per A and less than a meter per B? If so, isn't this is a simple paradox? Does anyone here see it that way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DJ_Juggernaut said:
Can a single meter stick be one meter per A and less than a meter per B?
What are A and B?
DJ_Juggernaut said:
If so, isn't this is a simple paradox?
Why?
 
A and B are observers in different frames. A is moving, B is stationary relative to the meter stick. B says, the length is one meter. While, A says, the length is less than a meter. This is a simple paradox. Does anyone here see it that way?
 
A.T. said:
Why?
Because A and B give differing answers for the length.
 
This is just your regular length contraction paradox and it is resolved essentially everywhere relativity is discussed in any meaningful manner. You will only think it is a paradox if you do not take into account that space and time mean different things in different inertial frames - including the relativity of simultaneity.
 
DJ_Juggernaut said:
A and B are observers in different frames. A is moving, B is stationary relative to the meter stick. B says, the length is one meter. While, A says, the length is less than a meter. This is a simple paradox. Does anyone here see it that way?

If you don't believe in SR then that's your prerogative. But, there's no point posting here.

This site is for those who want to learn SR, not those who want to dispute it.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Orodruin said:
You will only think it is a paradox if you do not take into account that space and time mean different things in different inertial frames - including the relativity of simultaneity.
Regardless, A and B still give different answers for the length of a meter stick. Is it not self-contradictory to you?
 
DJ_Juggernaut said:
Regardless, the A and B still give different answers for the length of a meter stick. Is it not self-contradictory to you?
Again, you are clearly not even bothering to understand why this is so. If you understood the theory, you would understand that it is not self-contradictory.
 
PeroK said:
This site is for those who want to learn SR, not those who want to dispute it.
I am not disputing it. I am asking whether anyone here sees a self-contradiction here. You can just say NO or YES. I will be on my way.
 
  • #10
So let me ask you this: You have a meter stick parallel to the x-axis. It is one meter in the direction of the x-axis. Now you rotate it 60 degrees and it is 0.5 meters in the direction of the x-axis. Is this self-contradictory?
 
  • #11
Orodruin, you still did not answer my question. If A says, the stick is one meter and B says, the stick is less than a meter. Is it not a self-contradiction?
 
  • #12
DJ_Juggernaut said:
I am not disputing it. I am asking whether anyone here sees a self-contradiction here. You can just say NO or YES. I will be on my way.

I see no contradiction.
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
I see no contradiction.
Okay. So, I send two observes to record the length of a stick and they both come back with different answers and that's not a contradiction. Okay. LOL. I am done.
 
  • #14
DJ_Juggernaut said:
This is a simple paradox.
If it's so simple, why can't you explain what is paradoxical about it?
DJ_Juggernaut said:
Does anyone here see it that way?
No. A meter stick measures length in the frame where it is at rest. In frames where it moves it doesn't have to be 1 meter.
 
  • #15
DJ_Juggernaut said:
Orodruin, you still did not answer my question. If A says, the stick is one meter and B says, the stick is less than a meter. Is it not a self-contradiction?
No, it is not and you refusing to even trying to understand this is quite telling.
 
  • #16
A.T. said:
A meter stick measures length in the frame where it is at rest. In frames where it moves it doesn't have to be 1 meter.
LOL. Okay.
 
  • #17
A.T. said:
If it's so simple, why can't you explain what is paradoxical about it?
Read above, I have already stated my position. I think I get the picture. I don't think anyone here sees a contradiction even though A and B come back with differing answers.
 
  • #18
DJ_Juggernaut said:
LOL. Okay.

You are here to learn, or to just lol at others? What is your point?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #19
weirdoguy said:
You are here to learn, or to just lol at others? What is your point?
Oh, I learned alright. I am done with this thread. I am quite satisfied with the responses I got. I thank all who responded.
 
  • #20
DJ_Juggernaut said:
Oh, I learned alright. I am done with this thread. I am quite satisfied with the responses I got. I thank all who responded.

Summary:
Orodruin said:
This is just your regular length contraction paradox and it is resolved essentially everywhere relativity is discussed in any meaningful manner.
A.T. said:
No. A meter stick measures length in the frame where it is at rest. In frames where it moves it doesn't have to be 1 meter.

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad How many meter sticks are there in this length contraction reasoning?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Undergrad Meter stick slides over a meter wide hole at a high speed
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
High School Calculating Time taken to reach speed with Time Dilation
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Undergrad Length Perception & Spacetime Warp: Is it Warped?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
High School A well defined thought experiment
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
Graduate When and Why Was the Definition of the Meter Changed?
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
12K
Length Contraction Paradox Scenario
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
Undergrad General relativistic comparison to Newtonian physics
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Undergrad Spacetime expansion - time dimension expansion
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
Undergrad Arguments leading to the speed of light as a dimensionless constant
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
5K