On what does gravity assist depend? (possibly with sources)

  • Thread starter Thread starter renobueno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital mecahnics
AI Thread Summary
Gravity assist relies on several factors beyond just velocity change, including the angle of approach and the mass ratio between the spacecraft and the planet. The trajectory must be carefully planned, as passing behind the planet increases velocity in the planet's direction, while passing in front decreases it. Understanding hyperbolic orbits is crucial, as they dictate how both the probe and planet interact during the maneuver. The discussion emphasizes the need for a balanced explanation that caters to the audience's educational level. Comprehensive sources that bridge the gap between oversimplification and complex physics are essential for a successful presentation.
renobueno
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hey guys, I am preparing for a presentation about gravity assist and I cant find much information about this topic. Ive gone already through wikipedia but wikipedia only talks about the velocity change. What are other factors which could have affects on the gravity assist?

Like I assume the velocity of the probe is important and perhaps even the angle of attack. But I couldnt explain why.

Hope you can help me out! I've searching for valuable sources for the past 6h but couldnt find something between oversimplified and raw physics degree. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just a velocity change, though, isn't it? Looking at the planet and the probe, they just loop round each other in a hyperbolic orbit, and they both change speed and direction (the probe more than the planet, due to the mass ratio). You just set up the approach to the planet so the exit speed of the probe is faster with respect to the Sun (or slower, whichever you were going for).

What education level are you supposed to be presenting at?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
If you read this Wikipedia article, what, specifically, are you asking for?
 
A key aspect to explain is why you need to pass behind the planet to gain velocity in the planet's direction but in front of it to gain velocity the other way.
Can you find an argument for that?
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and FactChecker
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top