One dimension conservative force and potential energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between conservative forces and potential energy in one-dimensional systems. The key equations highlighted are Fx = -du/dx and ΔU = -∫ F dx, which define how to derive potential energy from a conservative force and vice versa. The participant expresses confusion about the integration process and the definitions involved, particularly regarding the change in kinetic energy and its relevance to potential energy. Ultimately, the consensus is to utilize the provided equations for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative forces in physics
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of kinetic energy and work-energy principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential energy from conservative forces using the equation ΔU = -∫ F dx
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and work done by conservative forces
  • Learn about the implications of conservative forces in different physical systems
  • Investigate advanced topics such as energy conservation in non-conservative systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the principles governing conservative forces and potential energy.

SPhy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a conservative force, how can we obtain the change in potential energy?
Given a potential energy function, how can we determine the associated conservative force?

One dimensional.

Homework Equations



Fx = -du/dx

ΔU = -∫ F dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I know I can use the above expressions, however, how can I arrive at these expressions? My textbook and class notes simply say

BY DEFINITION: We will say the change in potential energy is equal to negative of the work done by the internal conservative force.

I know ΔKE = ∫ F ⋅ dr

I can integrate the right side but I obtain something like G(x1) - G(x2)

But then we define U(x) = -G(x) ?

So then to answer the question, should I simply use my equations listed above? Or is there a better way to approach this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SPhy said:
I know ΔKE = ∫ F ⋅ dr
There is not necessarily any KE involved here. That's just one possibility for where the work done has gone. If you generalise this to work done = ∫ F⋅dr then you seem to have all you need.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
818
Replies
9
Views
935
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K