One dimensional inelastic collision; bullet through block.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
J-dizzal
Messages
394
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


In the figure here, a 12.8 g bullet moving directly upward at 930 m/s strikes and passes through the center of mass of a 8.3 kg block initially at rest. The bullet emerges from the block moving directly upward at 520 m/s. To what maximum height does the block then rise above its initial position?

20150707_211326_zpsglwxmosy.jpg


Homework Equations


m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f

The Attempt at a Solution


20150707_210809_zpsywi6ntir.jpg

not sure where i went wrong with this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J-dizzal said:

Homework Statement


In the figure here, a 12.8 g bullet moving directly upward at 930 m/s strikes and passes through the center of mass of a 8.3 kg block initially at rest. The bullet emerges from the block moving directly upward at 520 m/s. To what maximum height does the block then rise above its initial position?

[ IMG]http://i1164.photobucket.com/albums/q562/falsovero/20150707_211326_zpsglwxmosy.jpg[/PLAIN]

Homework Equations


m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f

The Attempt at a Solution


[ IMG]http://i1164.photobucket.com/albums/q562/falsovero/20150707_210809_zpsywi6ntir.jpg[/PLAIN]
not sure where i went wrong with this one.
Velocity for block is correct.

Bad algebra in solving for y-y0 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: J-dizzal
Instead of y-y0 I will call it h and instead of a, I will call it g.

You wrote the equation v2=2gh... good so far... but then you wrote h=v2-2g :confused:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: J-dizzal
Nathanael said:
Instead of y-y0 I will call it h and instead of a, I will call it g.

You wrote the equation v2=2gh... good so far... but then you wrote h=v2-2g :confused:
I need to take an algebra class, again.
 
why is g positive in this problem? because the bullet is fired straight up and so the accerleration of g is -9.8m/s/s. I can see it works out in the equation for it to be positive, i just don't know the reason why.
 
Last edited:
J-dizzal said:
is g positive here? or would it be negative because it in the negative y direction?
So I'm assuming that you resolved the above question, because of your following post.
J-dizzal said:
Thank you
It may be helpful to you and us, if you could learn to use the edit feature and/or the delete feature to alter or to remove a post like Post #5.
 
SammyS said:
So I'm assuming that you resolved the above question, because of your following post.

It may be helpful to you and us, if you could learn to use the edit feature and/or the delete feature to alter or to remove a post like Post #5.
Sure, i didnt know about the delete feature. I'll edit it above.
 
J-dizzal said:
why is g positive in this problem? because the bullet is fired straight up and so the accerleration of g is -9.8m/s/s. I can see it works out in the equation for it to be positive, i just don't know the reason why.
Because it is really Vf (which you called V) that is zero, and the V0 is what is 0.6323. So g would be negative but you would also have to subtract V02 over to the other side and then the negative sign would cancel out.
 
Nathanael said:
Because it is really Vf (which you called V) that is zero, and the V0 is what is 0.6323. So g would be negative but you would also have to subtract V02 over to the other side and then the negative sign would cancel out.
Ok, i think i get it now because the problem is treated as two problems and the v_f i got from the first problem becomes v0 in the next. Thanks.