I Ontology of Causal Dynamical Triangulation

TheHeraclitus
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Does CDT involve gravitons? How many dimensions? Presentism, Eternalism or Agnosticism about time?
Also, what does Sabine mean in this video by the sentence: (5:51 in the video)
It treats space and time differently which Einstein thought us not to do.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheHeraclitus said:
Also, what does Sabine mean in this video by the sentence:
It means that space and time are not treated on an equal footing. In other words, it's not manifestly relativistic covariant.
 
Demystifier said:
It means that space and time are not treated on an equal footing. In other words, it's not manifestly relativistic covariant.
So it denies the reality of Spacetime?
 
TheHeraclitus said:
So it denies the reality of Spacetime?
According to Sabine, yes.
 
Demystifier said:
According to Sabine, yes.
Interesting, that would make sense since Wikipedia says CDT is related to Hořava gravity where space and time are treated differently too.
I am also a bit confused about the nature of space in CDT. Sabine says finite size of the triangles is only a mathematical aid.
Does this mean space is continuous or discrete in CDT?
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top